No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Abstract
A response to S. Elise Peeples's comment “Her Terrain is Outside His ‘Domain.’”
- Type
- Comment/Reply
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © 1991 by Hypatia, Inc.
References
Bandura, Albert 1974. Behavior theory and the models of man. American Psychologist 29: 859–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bandura, Albert, and MacDonald, Frederick. 1963. The influence of social reinforcement and the behavior of models in shaping children's moral judgments. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 67: 274–81.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Broughton, John. 1983. Men's virtue, women's rationality. Social Research 50: 597–624.Google Scholar
Eugene, Toinette. 1989. Sometimes I feel like a motherless child: The call and response for a liberational ethic of care by black feminists. In Who cares? Brabeck, Mary, ed. New York: Praeger Press.Google Scholar
Gilligan, Carol, and Michael Murphy, J. 1979. Development from adolescence to adulthood: The philosopher and the dilemma of fact. In Intellectual development beyond childhood. Kuhn, Deanna, ed. San Francisco: Josey‐Bass.Google Scholar
Gilligan, Carol and Belenky, Mary. 1980. A naturalistic study of abortion. In Clinical‐developmental psychology. Selman, Robert and Yando, Regina, eds. San Francisco: Josey‐Bass.Google Scholar
Greeno, Catherine, and Maccoby, Eleanor. 1986. How different is the “different voice”? Signs 11(2): 310–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen. 1989. Justice and solidarity: On the discussion concerning stage 6. Philosophical Forum 21(Fall/Winter): 32–52.Google Scholar
Kohlberg, Lawrence. [1969] 1984. Stage and sequence: the cognitive developmental approach to socialization. In Goslin, David, ed. Handbook of socialization theory and research. Chicago: Rand McNally.Google Scholar
Kohlberg, Lawrence. 1971a. From is to ought: How to commit the naturalistic fallacy and get away with it in the study of moral development. In Mischel, Theodore, ed. Cognitive development and epistemology. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Kohlberg, Lawrence. 1971b. Indoctrination versus relativity in values education. Zygon 6: 285–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kohlberg, Lawrence. 1984. The psychology of moral development. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Kuhn, Deanna. 1978. Mechanisms of cognitive and social development: One psychology or two? Human Development 21: 92–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levine, Charles, Hewer, Alexandra, and Kohlberg, Lawrence. 1984. Synopses and detailed replies to critics. In Lawrence Kohlberg's The psychology of moral development. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Luria, Zella. 1986. A methodological critique [of the different voice]. Signs 11(2): 316–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maccoby, Eleanor, and Jacklin, Carol. 1974. The psychology of sex differences. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Murphy, J. Michael, and Gilligan, Carol. 1980. Moral development in late adolescence and adulthood: A critique and reconstruction of Kohlberg's theory. Human Development 23: 77–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nunner‐Winkler, Gertrud. 1984. Two moralities? A critical discussion of an ethic of care and responsibility versus an ethic of rights and justice. In Morality, moral behavior, and development. Kurtines, William and Gewirtz, John, eds. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Puka, Bill. 1976. Moral education and its cure. In Reflections in values education. Meyers, John, ed. Waterloo, Ontario: Wilfred Laurier University Press.Google Scholar
Puka, Bill. [1979] 1990. Toward moral perfectionism (niceness rampant). Doctoral dissertation, Harvard University. New York: Garland Press.Google Scholar
Puka, Bill. 1983. Altruism and moral development. On the nature of prosocial development. Bridgeman, Diane, ed. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Puka, Bill. 1984. The savings approach to social conflict. Philosophy and social conflict. Bowling Green Studies in Philosophy (Spring).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Puka, Bill. [1986] 1989. Die nutzen und nachteil der stufe 6. In Zur bestimmung der moral philosophische und sozialwissenschaftliche beitrage. Edelstein, Wolfgang, ed. Munich: Surkamp Press. Reprinted in The domain of moral education. Thomas Wren, ed., Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Puka, Bill. 1988. Ethical caring: Pros, cons, and possibilities. In Inquiry into values. Lee, Steven, ed. New York: Mellen Press.Google Scholar
Puka, Bill. 1989a. Caring—in an interpretive voice. New Ideas in Psychology 7(3): 295–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Puka, Bill. 1989b. Just regard and caring concern: Different voices or separate realities? MOSAIC Monographs 4. Bath, England: University of Bath Press.Google Scholar
Puka, Bill. 1990. The liberation of caring: A different voice for Gilligan's “different voice.” Hypatia 5(1): 58–82. Reprinted in Who cares? Mary Brabeck, ed. New York: Praeger Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Puka, Bill. 1991. Interpretive experiments: Probing the care‐justice debate in moral development. Human Development 34(2): 61–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walker, Lawrence. 1984. Sex differences in the development of moral reasoning: A critical review. Child Development 55: 842–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar