Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T14:09:13.027Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Revisiting Confucian Jen Ethics and Feminist Care Ethics: A Reply to Daniel Star and Lijun Yuan

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 March 2020

Chenyang Li
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

At two fronts I defend my 1994 article. I argue that differences between Confucian jen ethics and feminist care ethics do not preclude their shared commonalities in comparison with Kantian. utilitarian, and contractarian ethics, and that Confucians do care. I also argue that Confucianism is capable of changing its rules to reflect its renewed understanding of jen, that care ethics is feminist, and that similarities between Confucian and care ethics have significant implications.

Type
Comment/Reply
Information
Hypatia , Volume 17 , Issue 1 , Winter 2002 , pp. 130 - 140
Copyright
Copyright © 2002 by Hypatia, Inc.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Chan, Sin Yee. 2001. Can Shu be the one word that serves as the guiding principle of caring actions? In The examined life: Chinese perspectives—essays on Chinese ethical traditions, ed. Jiang, Xinyan. Binghamton, N.Y.: Global Publications. Confucius. 541‐479 b.c.e. Analects.Google Scholar
Gilligan, Carol. 1982. In a different voice: Psychological theory and women's development. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Kuppermann, Joel. 2000. Feminism as radical Confucianism: Self and tradition. In The sage and the second sex: Confucianism, ethics, and gender, ed. Li, Chenyang. La Salle, III.: Open Court.Google Scholar
Li, Chenyang. 1993. Natural kinds: Direct reference, realism, and the impossibility of necessary a posteriori truth. Review Of Metaphysics 47: 261–76.Google Scholar
Li, Chenyang. 1994. The Confucian concept of Jen and the feminist ethics of care: A comparative study. Hypatia 9 (1):70–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, Chenyang. 1997. Confucian value and democratic value. Journal of Value Inquiry 31: 183–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, Chenyang. 1999. The Tao encounters the West: Explorations in comparative philosophy. Albany: The State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Li, Chenyang. 2000. The sage and the second sex: Confucianism, ethics, and gender. La Salle, III.: Open Court.Google Scholar
Noddings, Nel. 1984. Caring: A feminine approach to ethics and moral education. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Shafer, Ingrid. 2000. From Confucius through ecofeminism to partnership ethics. In The sage and the second sex: Confucianism, ethics, and gender, ed. Li, Chenyang. La Salle, III.: Open Court.Google Scholar
Slote, Michael. 1998. The justice of caring. In Virtues and vice, ed. Frankel Paul, Ellen, Miller, Fred D. Jr., and Paul, Jeffrey. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Slote, Michael. 2000. Virtue ethics. In The Blackwell guide to ethical theory, ed. LaFollette, Hugh. Malden, Mass.: Blackwell Publishers.Google Scholar
Star, Daniel. 2002. Do Confucians Really Care? A Defense of the Distinctiveness of Care Ethics. Hypatia 17 (1): 77–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tao, Julia Po‐Wah Lai. 2000. Two perspectives of care: Confucian Ren and feminist care. Journal of Chinese Philosophy 27 (June): 215–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yuan, Lijun. 2002. Ethics of Care and Concept of Jen. Hypatia 17 (1): 107–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar