Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T03:33:08.504Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Rethinking Sadomasochism: Feminism, Interpretation, and Simulation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 March 2020

Patrick D. Hopkins
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In reexamining the “sex war” debates between radical feminists and lesbian feminist sadomasochists, I find that the actual practice of sadomasochism provides the basis for a philosophically more complex position than has been articulated. In response to the anti-SM radical perspective, I develop a distinction between simulation and replication of patriarchal dominant/submissive activities. In light of this important epistemological and ethical distinction, I claim that the radical feminist opposition to SM needs reassessment.

Type
Research Article
Information
Hypatia , Volume 9 , Issue 1 , Winter 1994 , pp. 116 - 141
Copyright
Copyright © 1994 by Hypatia, Inc.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bar‐On, Bat Ami. 1982. Feminism and sadomasochism: Self‐critical notes. In Against sadomasochism: A radical feminist analysis. See Linden et al. 1982.Google Scholar
Bartky, Sandra. 1990. Femininity and domination New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Baudrillard, Jean. 1983. Simulations New York: Semiotext(e).Google Scholar
Butler, Judith. 1982. Lesbian S & M: The politics of dis‐illusion. In Against sadomasochism: A radical feminist analysis. See Linden et al. 1982.Google Scholar
Butler, Judith. 1991. Imitation and gender insubordination. In Insidelout: Lesbian theories, gay theories, ed. Fuss, Diana. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Califia, Pat. 1987. A personal view of the history of the lesbian S/M community and movement in San Francisco. In Coming to power: Writings and graphics on lesbian S/M. See Samois 1987.Google Scholar
Califia, Pat. 1988. Macho sluts Boston: Alyson Publications, Inc.Google Scholar
Califia, Pat. 1990. Doc and fluff: The distopian tale of a girl and her biker Boston: Alyson Publications, Inc.Google Scholar
Califia, Pat. 1992. The limits of the S/M relationship, or Mr. Benson doesn't live here anymore. In Leatherfolk: Radical sex, people, politics, and practice. See Thompson 1991.Google Scholar
Daly, Mary, 1978. Gyn/Ecology: The metaethics of radical feminism. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Delueze, Gilles and Guattari, Félix. 1977. Anti‐Oedipus. Trans. Hurley, Robert, Seem, Mark and Lane, Helen R.New York: Viking.Google Scholar
Ferguson, Ann. 1984. Sex war: The debate between radical and libertarian feminists. Signs 10(1): 106–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hein, Hilde. 1982. Sadomasochism and the liberal tradition. In Against sadomasochism: A radical feminist analysis. See Linden et al. 1982.Google Scholar
Hoagland, Sarah Lucia. 1982. Sadism, masochism and lesbian‐feminism. In Against sadomasochism: A radical feminist analysis. See Linden et al. 1982.Google Scholar
Keepers, Sarah. 1991. Letter to the editor in On our backs: Entertainment for the adventurous lesbian, May/June.Google Scholar
Kirk, Marshall and Madsen, Hunter. 1989. After the ball: How America will conquer its fear of gays in the 1990s New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
Linden, Robin Ruth, Pagano, Darlene R., Russell, Diana E. H., and Star, Susan Leigh. 1982. Against sadomasochism: A radical feminist analysis San Francisco: Frog In The Well.Google Scholar
Lingis, Alphonso. 1985. Libido: The French existential theories Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Lorde, Audre and Star, Susan Leigh. 1982. Interview with Audre Lorde. In Against sadomasochism: A radical feminist analysis. See Linden et al. 1982.Google Scholar
Meredith, Jesse. 1982. A Response to Samois. In Against sadomasochism: A radical feminist analysis. See Linden et al. 1982.Google Scholar
Rian, Karen. 1982. Sadomasochism and the social construction of desire. In Against sadomasochism: A radical feminist analysis. See Linden et al. 1982.Google Scholar
Rubin, Gayle. 1987. The leather menace: Comments on politics and S/M. In Coming to power: Writings and graphics on lesbian S/M. See Samois. 1987.Google Scholar
Russell, Diana E. H. 1982. Sadomasochism: A contra‐feminist activity. In Against sadomasochism: A radical feminist analysis. See Linden et al. 1982.Google Scholar
Samois. 1987. Coming to power: Writings and graphics on lesbian S/M. Boston: Alyson Publications, Inc.Google Scholar
Saxe, Lorena Leigh. 1992. Sadomasochism and exclusion. Hypatia 7(4): 59–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, Mark, ed. 1991. Leatherfolk: radical sex, people, politics, and practice Boston: Alyson Publications, Inc.Google Scholar
Truscott, Carol. 1991. S/M: Some questions and a few answers. In Leatherfolk: Radical sex, people, politics, and practice. See Thompson 1991.Google Scholar
Walker, Alice. 1982. A letter of the times, or should this sadomasochism be saved? In Against sadomasochism: A radical feminist analysis. See Linden et al. 1982.Google Scholar
Weinberg, Martin S., Williams, Colin J., and Moser, Charles. 1984. The social constituents of sadomasochism. Social Problems 31(4): 379–389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar