Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T04:05:00.541Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Rethinking Philosophy in the Third Wave of Feminism

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 March 2020

David Golumbia
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The influence of feminist theory on philosophy has been less pervasive than it might have been. This is due in part to inherent tensions between feminist critique and the university as an institution, and to philosophy's place in the academy. These tensions, if explored rather than resisted, can result in a revitalized, more explicitly feminist conception of philosophy itself, wherein philosophy is seen as an attempt to rethink the deepest aspects of experience and culture.

Type
Third Generation
Information
Hypatia , Volume 12 , Issue 3: Special Issue: Third Wave Feminisms , Summer 1997 , pp. 100 - 115
Copyright
Copyright © 1997 by Hypatia, Inc.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Addelson, Kathryn Pyne. 1994a. Feminist philosophy and the women's movement. Hypatia 9(3): 216–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Addelson, Kathryn Pyne. 1994b. Moral passages: Toward a collectivist moral theory. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Alcoff, Linda, and Potter, Elizabeth, eds. 1993. Feminist epistemobgies. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Althusser, Louis. 1971. Ideology and ideological state apparatuses (Notes toward an investigation). Ii Lenin and philosophy and other essays, trans. Bewster, Ben. New York: Monthly Review Press.Google Scholar
Antony, Louise M., and Witt, Charlotte, eds. 1993. A mind of one's own: Feminist essays on reason and objectivity. Boulder: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Bartky, Sandra Lee. 1990. Femininity and domination: Studies in the phenomenology of oppression. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Brennan, Teresa. 1993. History after Lacan. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Butler, Judith. 1990. Gender trouble: Feminism and the subversion of identity. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Butler, Judith. 1991. Imitation and gender insubordination. In Inside/Out: Lesbian theories, gay theories, ed. Fuss, Diana. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Butler, Judith. 1992. Contingent foundations: Feminism and the question of “postmodernism.” Ii Feminists theorize the political, ed. Butler, Judith and Scott, Joan W.New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Butler, Judith. 1993. Bodies that matter: On the discursive limits of “sex.” New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Deleuze, Gilles, and Guattari, Felix. 1994. What is phibsophy? Trans. Tomlinson, Hugh and Burchell, Graham. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Derrida, Jacques. 1984. Languages and institutions of philosophy, trans. Söderlind, Sylvia, Comay, Rebecca, Havercroft, Barbara, Adamson, Joseph, Moyal, Gabriel and Savan, David. Recherches Sémiotiques/Semiotic Inquiry 4(2): 91–154.Google Scholar
Derrida, Jacques. 1990. Du droitalaphiiosop/ue. Paris: Galilee.Google Scholar
Derrida, Jacques. 1995. Points … interviews 1974‐1994, ed. Weber, Elisabeth, trans. Kamuf, Peggyet. al. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Ferguson, Ann. 1994. Twenty yeats of feminist philosophy. Hypatia 9(3): 197–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foucault, Michel. 1972. The archaeobgy of knowledge and the discourse on hnguage. Trans. Smith, A.M. Sheridan. New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. 1977. Discipline andpunish: The birth of the prison. Trans. Sheridan, Alan. New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
Golumbia, David. Forthcoming‐a. Feminism and mental representation: Analytic philosophy, cultural studies, and narrow content. Ii Is feminist philosophy philosophy?, ed. Sheth, Tina and Bianchi, Emma. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
Golumbia, David. Forthcoming‐b. Quine, Derrida, and the question of philosophy. Diacritics.Google Scholar
Golumbia, David. Forthcoming‐c. Quine's ambivalence. Cultural Critique.Google Scholar
Grosz, Elizabeth. 1993. Feminism and the crisis of reason. In Alcoff and Potter 1993.Google Scholar
Grosz, Elizabeth. 1994. Vohtile bodies. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Harding, Sandra. 1986. The science question in feminism. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Harding, Sandra. 1991. Whose science? Whose knowledge? Thinking from women's lives. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Irigaray, Luce. 1993. An ethics of sexual difference. Trans. Burke, Carolyn and Gill, Gillian C.Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Longino, Helen. 1990. Science as social knowledge: Values and objectivity in scientific inquiry. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
McAlister, Linda Lopez. 1994. On the possibility of feminist philosophy. Hypatia 9(3): 188–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Margolis, Joseph. 1995a. A biopsy of recent analytic philosophy. The Phihsophical Forum 26(3): 161–88.Google Scholar
Margolis, Joseph. 1995b. Historien thought, constructed world: A conceptual primer for the turn of the millennium. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Nelson, Lynn Hankinson. 1990. Who knows: From Quine to a feminist empiricism. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
Nelson, Lynn Hankinson, ed. 1995. Feminism and science. Single-topic issue of Synthese 104(3).Google Scholar
Putnam, Hilary. 1990. Realism with a human face, ed. Conant, James. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Putnam, Hilary. 1992. Renewing philosophy. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Putnam, Hilary. 1994. Words and life, ed. Conant, James. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Rorty, Richard. 1979. Philosophy and the minor of nature. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Scheman, Naomi. 1993a. Confessions of an analytic philosopher semi-manqué. In Scheman 1993b.Google Scholar
Scheman, Naomi. 1993b. Engendering: Constructions of knowledge, authority, and privilege. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Scheman, Naomi. 1993c. Individualism and the objects of psychology. In Scheman 1993b.Google Scholar
Scheman, Naomi. 1993d. Undoing philosophy as a feminist. In Scheman 1993b.Google Scholar
Sommers, Christina Hoff. 1994. Who stole feminism?: How women have betrayed women. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
Spivak, Gayatri Chakravorty. 1990. Interview with Radical philosophy. Ii The post‐colonial critic: Interviews, strategies, dialogues, ed. Harasym, Sarah. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Wittig, Monique. 1992. The straight mind and other essays. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar