Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T22:47:04.892Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Religious Agency and the Limits of Intersectionality

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2020

Jakeet Singh
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article probes the relative absence of religion within discussions of intersectionality, and begins to address this absence by bringing intersectionality studies into conversation with another significant field within feminist theory: the study of religious women's agency. Although feminist literatures on intersectionality and religious women's agency have garnered a great deal of scholarly attention, these two bodies of work have rarely been engaged together. After surveying both fields, I argue that research on religious women's agency not only exposes an ambiguity at the heart of intersectionality between identity and oppression, but also challenges several aspects of intersectionality studies, especially as recent theorists increasingly turn away from identity politics in favor of a structural critique of power. These aspects of intersectionality include its often unsituated critique of power, as well as its reliance on a negatively defined consensus on anti‐oppression.

Type
Diversity Essay Prize Honorable Mention
Information
Hypatia , Volume 30 , Issue 4 , Fall 2015 , pp. 657 - 674
Copyright
Copyright © 2015 by Hypatia, Inc.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Asad, Talal. 1993. Genealogies of religion: Discipline and reasons of power in Christianity and Islam. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Avishai, Orit. 2008. “Doing religion” in a secular world: Women in conservative religions and the question of agency. Gender & Society 22 (4): 409–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bilge, Sirma. 2010. Beyond subordination vs. resistance: An intersectional approach to the agency of veiled Muslim women. Journal of Intercultural Studies 31 (1): 9–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bracke, Sarah. 2003. Author(iz)ing agency: Feminist scholars making sense of women's involvement in religious “fundamentalist” movements. European Journal of Women's Studies 10 (3): 335–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bracke, Sarah. 2008. Conjugating the modern/religious, conceptualizing female religious agency: Contours of a “post‐secular” conjuncture. Theory, Culture & Society 25 (6): 51–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braidotti, Rosi. 2008. In spite of the times: The postsecular turn in feminism. Theory, Culture & Society 25 (6): 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bucar, Elizabeth M. 2010. Dianomy: Understanding religious women's moral agency as creative conformity. Journal of the American Academy of Religion 78 (3): 662–86.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Burke, Kelsy C. 2012. Women's agency in gender‐traditional religions: A review of four approaches. Sociology Compass 6 (2): 122–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carastathis, Anna. 2014. The concept of intersectionality in feminist theory. Philosophy Compass 9 (5): 304–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carbin, Maria, and Edenheim, Sara. 2013. The intersectional turn in feminist theory: A dream of a common language? European Journal of Women's Studies 20 (3): 233–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cho, Sumi, Kimberlé Williams, Crenshaw, and Leslie, McCall. 2013. Toward a field of intersectionality studies: Theory, application, and praxis. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 38 (4): 785–810.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collins, Patricia Hill. 2000. Black feminist thought: Knowle dge, consciousness, and the politics of empowerment. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Combahee River Collective. 1982. A black feminist statement. In All the women are white, all the blacks are men, but some of us are brave: Black women's studies, ed. Hull, Gloria T., Bell Scott, Patricia and Smith, Barbara. New York: Feminist Press.Google Scholar
Crenshaw, Kimberlé Williams. 1989. Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: A black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theory and antiracist politics. University of Chicago Legal Forum: 139–67.Google Scholar
Crenshaw, Kimberlé Williams. 1991. Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. Stanford Law Review 43: 1241–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dhamoon, Rita Kaur. 2011. Considerations on mainstreaming intersectionality. Political Research Quarterly 64 (1): 230–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dressler, Markus, and Mandair, Arvind‐Pal, eds. 2011. Secularism and religion‐making. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fraser, Nancy. 1997. Justice interruptus: Critical reflections on the “post‐socialist” condition. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hancock, Ange‐Marie. 2007. When multiplication doesn't equal quick addition: Examining intersectionality as a research paradigm. Perspectives on Politics 5 (1): 63–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harding, Sandra, ed. 2004. The feminist standpoint reader: Intellectual and political controversies. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Heyes, Cressida. 2014. Identity politics. In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter), ed. Zalta, Edward N. http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2014/entries/identity-politics/ (accessed June 20, 2015).Google Scholar
hooks, bell. 1984. Feminist theory: From margin to center. Cambridge, Mass.: South End Press.Google Scholar
hooks, bell. 2000. Feminism is for everybody: Passionate politics. Cambridge, Mass.: South End Press.Google Scholar
Korteweg, Anna C. 2008. The Sharia debate in Ontario: Gender, Islam, and representations of Muslim women's agency. Gender & Society 22 (4): 434–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindsay, Keisha. 2013. God, gays, and progressive politics: Reconceptualizing intersectionality as a normatively malleable analytical framework. Perspectives on Politics 11 (2): 447–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mahmood, Saba. 2005. Politics of piety: The Islamic revival and the feminist subject. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Masuzawa, Tomoko. 2005. The invention of world religions: Or, how European universalism was preserved in the language of pluralism. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parashar, Swati. 2010. The sacred and the sacrilegious: Exploring women's “politics” and “agency” in radical religious movements in South Asia. Totalitarian Movements and Political Religions 11 (3–4): 435–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rinaldo, Rachel. 2014. Pious and critical: Muslim women activists and the question of agency. Gender & Society 28 (6): 824–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shaikh, Khanum. 2013. Gender, religious agency, and the subject of Al‐Huda International. Meridians: Feminism, Race, Transnationalism 11 (2): 62–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shaikh, Nermeen. 2007. The present as history: Critical perspectives on global power. New York: Columbia University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smiet, Katrine. 2015. Post/secular truths: Sojourner Truth and the intersections of gender, race and religion. European Journal of Women's Studies 22 (1): 7–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spelman, Elizabeth V. 1988. Inessential woman: Problems of exclusion in feminist thought. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Tomlinson, Barbara. 2013. To tell the truth and not get trapped: Desire, distance, and intersectionality at the scene of argument. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 38 (4): 993–1017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weber, Beverly M. 2015. Gender, race, religion, faith? Rethinking intersectionality in German feminisms. European Journal of Women's Studies 22 (1): 22–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weir, Allison. 2013. Feminism and the Islamic revival: Freedom as a practice of belonging. Hypatia 28 (2): 323–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yuval‐Davis, Nira. 2006. Intersectionality and feminist politics. European Journal of Women's Studies 13 (3): 193–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yuval‐Davis, Nira. 2011. The politics of belonging: Intersectional contestations. Los Angeles: Sage.Google Scholar
Zion‐Waldoks, Tanya. 2015. Politics of devoted resistance: Agency, feminism, and religion among Orthodox Agunah activists in Israel. Gender & Society 29 (1): 73–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar