Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T21:03:57.515Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Relational Group Autonomy: Ethics of Care and the Multiculturalism Paradigm

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 March 2020

Fiona MacDonald
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In recent decades, group autonomy approaches to multiculturalism have gained legitimacy within both academic and policy circles. This article examines the centrality of group autonomy in the multiculturalism debate, particularly in the highly influential approach of Will Kymlicka. I argue that his response to the dilemmas of liberal-democratic multiculturalism relies on an underdeveloped conceptualization of group autonomy. Despite presumably good intentions, his narrow notion of cultural group autonomy obscures the requirements of minority group members' democratic capabilities and thereby works against the kind of transformative change that “accommodated” groups are seeking from the state. Although some critics (Young 1990; Benhabib 2002) have gone so far as to reject autonomy-based approaches to accommodation altogether (Young 1990, 251), I suggest that this position goes too far. In response, I offer an intermediary position between those that defend and those that reject an autonomy-based approach. Instead of fully rejecting autonomy as a guiding principle for multiculturalism, I develop an ethics of care approach to group autonomy based on relationality, which addresses the inadequacies of the dominant approach to multiculturalism. Such an account of group autonomy is a vital step toward reconciling multiculturalism with the necessary components of liberal-democratic citizenship.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Hypatia , Volume 25 , Issue 1: Special Issue: FEAST I: Current Work in Feminist Ethics and Social Theory , Winter 2010 , pp. 196 - 212
Copyright
Copyright © 2010 by Hypatia, Inc.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alfred, Taiaake, and Corntassel, Jeff. 2005. Being indigenous: Resurgences against contemporary colonialism. Government and Opposition 40 (4): 597–614.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Assembly of First Nations. 2007. Canadian Human Rights Complaint on First Nations Child Welfare filed today by Assembly of First Nations and First Nations Child and Family Caring Society of Canada. Available at http://www.afn.ca/article.asp?id=3374 (accessed February 27, 2007).Google Scholar
Barry, Brian. 2000. Culture and equality: An egalitarian critique of multiculturalism. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Benhabib, Seyla. 2002. Claims of culture: Equality and diversity in the global era. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borrows, John. 2000. Landed citizenship: Narratives of aboriginal political participation. In Citizenship in diverse societies, ed. Kymlicka, Will and Norman, Wayne. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Brown, Wendy. 1995. States of injury: Power and freedom in late modernity. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Carens, Joseph H. 1997. Liberalism and culture. Constellations 4 (1): 35–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clement, Grace. 1996. Care, autonomy, and justice. Bounder, Colo.: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Coulthard, Glen. 2007. Subjects of empire: Indigenous peoples and the “politics of recognition” in Canada. Contemporary Political Theory 6 (4): 437–60.10.1057/palgrave.cpt.9300307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foucault, Michel. 1982. The subject and power. In Michel Foucault, ed. Dreyfus, Hubert L. and Rabinow, Paul. Toronto: Random House Canada.Google Scholar
Friedman, Marilyn. 2003. Autonomy, gender, politics. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen. 1998. The inclusion of the other: Studies in political theory. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Keller, Evelyn Fox. 1985. Reflections on gender and science. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Kymlicka, Will. 1995. Multicultural citizenship. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kymlicka, Will. 2007. Multicultural odysseys. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacDonald, Fiona. 2009. The Manitoba government's shift to “autonomous” First Nations child welfare: Empowerment or privatization? In First Nations, first thoughts, ed. Timpson, Annis May. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press.Google Scholar
MacKenzie, Catriona, and Stoljar, Natalie. 2000. Introduction: Autonomy reconfigured. In Relational autonomy: Feminist perspectives on autonomy, agency, and the social self, ed. MacKenzie, Catriona and Stoljar, Natalie. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Monture‐Angus, Patricia. 1998. Journeying forward: Dreaming First Nations' independence. Halifax, N.S.: Fernwood.Google Scholar
Nedelsky, Jennifer. 1989. Reconceiving autonomy: Sources, thoughts, and possibilities. Yale Journal of Law and Feminism 1:7–36.Google Scholar
Noël, Alain. 2000. Without Quebec: Collaborative federalism with a footnote? Policy Matters 1 (2): 2–26.Google Scholar
Okin, Susan Moller. 1999. Is multiculturalism bad for women? In Is multiculturalism bad for women?, ed. Cohen, Joshua, Howard, Matthew, and Nussbaum, Martha C.Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Shachar, Ayelet. 2001. Multicultural jurisdictions: Cultural differences and women's rights. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turner, Dale. 2006. This is not a peace pipe: Towards a critical indigenous philosophy. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google ScholarPubMed
Turpel, Mary Ellen. 1991. Aboriginal peoples and the Canadian charter: Interpretive monopolies, cultural differences. In First Nations issues, ed. Devlin, Richard E.Toronto: Edmond Montgomery.Google Scholar
Williams, Melissa. 2003. Citizenship as identity, citizenship as shared fate, and the functions of multicultural education. In Citizenship and education in liberal democratic societies: Teaching for cosmopolitan values and collective identities, ed. McDonough, Kevin and Feinberg, Walter. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Young, Iris Marion. 1990. Justice and the politics of difference. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Young, Iris Marion. 2000. Inclusion and democracy. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar