Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-t6hkb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-15T20:48:17.375Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Redirecting Feminist Critiques of Science

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 March 2020

Martha Mccaughey
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Applying the insights of Donna Haraway (1989, 1991) and Helen Longino (1989, 1990), this paper reviews Sandra Harding's (1986a) tripartite model of feminist critiques of science—empiricist, standpoint, and postmodern—and argues that it is based on misunderstandings of the relationship between scientific inquiry, objectivity, and values. An alternative view of scientific inquiry makes it possible to see feminist scientists as postmodern and postmodern feminists as having standpoints.

Type
Research Article
Information
Hypatia , Volume 8 , Issue 4 , Fall 1993 , pp. 72 - 84
Copyright
Copyright © 1993 by Hypatia, Inc.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bernstein, Richard. 1983. Beyond objectivism and relativism. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Brown, Wendy. 1991. Feminist hesitations, postmodern exposures, differences 3(1): 63–84.Google Scholar
Collins, Patricia Hill. 1989. The social construction of black feminist thought. Signs 14(4): 745–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daly, Mary. 1978. Gyn/Ecology: The metaethics of radical feminism. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Derrida, Jacques. 1981. Dissemination. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Di Stefano, Christine. 1990. Dilemmas of difference: Feminism, modernity and postmodernism. In Feminism/postmodernism, ed.Nicholson, Linda J.New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Duran, Jane. 1991. Toward a feminist epistemology. Savage, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Farrell, Warren. 1986. Why men are the way they are: The male‐female dynamic. New York: McGraw‐Hill.Google Scholar
Flax, Jane. 1987. Postmodernism and gender relations in feminist theory. Signs 12(4): 621–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gergen, Kenneth. 1988. Feminist critique of science and the challenge of social epistemology. In Feminist thought and the structure of knowledge, ed.Gergen, Mary McCanney. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Gunnell, John. 1986. Between philosophy and politics. Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press.Google Scholar
Haraway, Donna. 1989. Primate visions: Gender, race, and nature in the world of modem science. New York: Routledge, Chapman & Hall.Google Scholar
Haraway, Donna. 1991. Simians, cyborgs, and women. New York: Routledge, Chapman and Hall.Google Scholar
Harding, Sandra. 1986a. The science question in feminism. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Harding, Sandra. 1986b. The instability of the analytical categories of feminist theory. Signs 11(4): 645–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harding, Sandra. 1990. Feminism, science, and the anti‐enlightenment critiques. In Feminism/postmodernism ed.Nicholson, Linda J.New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Harding, Sandra. 1991. Whose science? Whose knowledge? Thinking from women's lives. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Hartsock, Nancy. 1983. The feminist standpoint: Developing the grounds for a specifically feminist historical materialism. In Discovering reality, ed.Harding, Sandra and Hintikka, Merrill. Dordrecht: Reidel Publishing Co.Google Scholar
Hartsock, Nancy. 1990. Foucault on power: A theory for women? In Feminism/postmodernism, ed.Nicholson, Linda J.New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hawkesworth, Mary E. 1987. Feminist epistemology: A survey of the field. Women and Politics 7(3): 115–27.Google Scholar
Hawkesworth, Mary E. 1989. Knowers, knowing, known: Feminist theory and claims of truth. Signs 14(3): 533–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hekman, Susan. 1987. The feminization of epistemology: Gender and the social sciences. Women and Politics 7(3): 65–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hekman, Susan. 1990. Gender and knowledge: Elements of a postmodern feminism. Boston: North eastern University Press.Google Scholar
Herzog, Don. 1985. Without foundations: Justification in political theory. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Hrdy, Sarah. 1981. The woman that never evolved. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Hubbard, Ruth. 1988. Some thoughts about the masculinity of the natural sciences. In Feminist thought and the structure of knowledge, ed.Gergen, Mary McCanney. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Keller, Evelyn Fox. 1985. Reflections on gender and science. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
King, Deborah K. 1988. Multiple jeopardy, multiple consciousness: The context of a black feminist ideology. Signs 14(1): 42–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kress, Paul. 1979. Against epistemology. Journal of Politics 41(2): 526–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krupnick, Mark, ed. 1983. Displacement. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Longino, Helen E. 1989. Feminist critiques of rationality: Critiques of science or philosophy of science? Women's Studies International Forum 12(3): 261–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Longino, Helen E. 1990. Science as social knowledge: Values and objectivity in scientific inquiry. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
MacKinnon, Catharine A. 1989. Toward a feminist theory of the state. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Millman, Marcia, and Kanter, Rosabeth Moss. 1975. Introduction to Another voice: Feminist perspectives on social life and social science. New York: Anchor Books.Google Scholar
Rorty, Richard. 1989. Contingency, irony, and solidarity. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rorty, Richard. 1991a. Objectivity, relativism, and truth. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rorty, Richard. 1991b. Feminism and pragmatism. Michigan Quarterly Review. XXX(2): 231–58.Google Scholar
Rose, Hilary. 1983. Hand, brain, and heart: A feminist epistemology for the natural sciences. Signs 9(1): 73–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Barbara Herrnstein. 1988. Contingencies of value: Alternative perspectives for critical theory. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Smith, Dorothy E. 1987. The everyday world as problematic: A feminist sociology. Boston: Northeastern University Press.Google Scholar