Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T03:11:28.523Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Race and a Transnational Reproductive Caste System: Indian Transnational Surrogacy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2020

Abstract

When it comes to discourses around women's labor in global contexts, we need feminist philosophical frameworks that take the intersections of gender, race, and global capitalism seriously in order to arrive at a comprehensive understanding of women's lives within global processes. Women of color feminist philosophy can bring much to the table in such discussions. In this essay, I theorize about a concrete instance of global women's labor: transnational commercial gestational surrogacy. By introducing a “racialized gender” analysis into the philosophical debate on this issue, I argue that women's reproductive labor is becoming increasingly stratified within the global economy along racial and other lines. This paves the way for a “transnational reproductive caste system,” which ends up reifying various social hierarchies and sustaining existing global inequities. I aim to expose the kind of violence that surrogates experience due to such stratification as women of color in a transnational space. I discuss how discourses of race and existing racial hierarchies play out in international surrogacy and ways in which these, and indeed, the very category of “woman of color” get complicated in international contexts when they intermingle with other localized social forms and global inequities. For the purposes of my argument, I engage several insights from feminist of color Dorothy Roberts's work on race and reproductive technologies in the US.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © 2014 by Hypatia, Inc.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alcoff, Linda Martín. 2006. Visible identities: Race, gender, and the self. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alvarez, Lizette. 2004. Spreading Scandinavian genes without Viking boats. New York Times, September. 30.Google Scholar
Bailey, Alison. 2011. Reconceiving surrogacy: Toward a reproductive justice account of Indian surrogacy. Hypatia 26 (4): 715–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Banerjee, Amrita. 2010. Re‐orienting the ethics of transnational surrogacy as a feminist pragmatist. The Pluralist 5 (3): 107–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bhatia, Shekhar. 2009. Mumbai clinic sends couple email. The Evening Standard, May. 20.Google Scholar
Burke, Jason. 2010. India's surrogate mothers face new rules to restrict “pot of gold”. The Guardian, July. 30.Google Scholar
Gupta, Jyotsna Agnihotri. 2012. Reproductive biocrossings: Indian egg donors and surrogates in the globalized fertility market. International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics 5 (1): 2551.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ikemoto, Lisa C. 2009. Reproductive tourism: Equality concerns in the global market for fertility services. Law and Inequality 27: 277309.Google Scholar
Immerwahr, Daniel. 2007. Caste or colony? Indianizing race in the United States. Modern Intellectual History 4 (2): 275301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loomba, Ania. 2009. Race and the possibilities of comparative critique. New Literary History 40 (3): 501–22.Google Scholar
Menon, Nivedita. 2011. Caste on the international stage. Economic and Political Weekly 46 (3). bahujannews.blogspot.com/2011/01/zestcaste-caste-on-international-stage.html (accessed August 15, 2012).Google Scholar
Menon, Nivedita. 2012. The regulation of surrogacy in India. http://kafila.org/2012/01/10/the-regulation-of-surrogacy-in-india-questions-and-concerns-sama/ (accessed January 31, 2013).Google Scholar
Mohanty, Chandra Talpade. 2003. Feminism without borders: Decolonizing theory, practicing solidarity. Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pande, Amrita. 2009. Not an “angel”, not a “whore”: Surrogates as “dirty” workers in India. Indian Journal of Gender Studies 16 (2): 141–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parks, Jennifer A. 2010. Care ethics and the global practice of commercial surrogacy. Bioethics 24 (7): 333–40.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rai, Saritha. 2010. More and more Indians want egg donors, but only if they're from the right caste. The Global Post, September. 22.Google Scholar
Roberts, Dorothy. 1997. Killing the black body: Race, reproduction, and the meaning of liberty. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
Roberts, Dorothy. 2005. Privatization and punishment in the new age of reprogenetics. Emory Law Journal 54 (3): 1343–60.Google Scholar
Roberts, Dorothy. 2009. Race, gender, and genetic technologies: A new reproductive dystopia? Signs 34 (4): 783804.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saxena et al. 2012. Surrogacy: Ethical and legal issues. Indian Journal of Community Medicine 37 (4): 211213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vora, Kalindi. 2009a. Indian transnational surrogacy and the disaggregation of mothering work. Anthropology News 50 (2): 912.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vora, Kalindi. 2009b. Indian transnational surrogacy and the commodification of vital energy. Subjectivity 28 (1): 266–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weiss, Kenneth R. 2001. Eggs buy a college education. Los Angeles Times, May. 27.Google Scholar