Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T21:42:25.741Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Quantifying the Gender Gap: An Empirical Study of the Underrepresentation of Women in Philosophy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 March 2020

Molly Paxton ,
Carrie Figdor  and
Valerie Tiberius
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The lack of gender parity in philosophy has garnered serious attention recently. Previous empirical work that aims to quantify what has come to be called “the gender gap” in philosophy focuses mainly on the absence of women in philosophy faculty and graduate programs. Our study looks at gender representation in philosophy among undergraduate students, undergraduate majors, graduate students, and faculty. Our findings are consistent with what other studies have found about women faculty in philosophy, but we were able to add two pieces of new information. First, the biggest drop in the proportion of women in philosophy occurs between students enrolled in introductory philosophy classes and philosophy majors. Second, this drop is mitigated by the presence of more women philosophy faculty.

Type
Musings
Information
Hypatia , Volume 27 , Issue 4 , Fall 2012 , pp. 949 - 957
Copyright
Copyright © 2012 by Hypatia, Inc.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Buckwalter, Walter, and Stich, Stephen. 2010. Gender and philosophical intuition. http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1966324 (accessed April 21, 2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calhoun, Cheshire. 2009. Musings: The undergraduate pipeline problem. Hypatia 24 (2): 216–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Division APAP. 2011. Program review report, 2004–2011. Committee E, editor. http://apa-pacific.org/governance/Program_Review_Report.2004-11.pdf (accessed April 21, 2012).Google Scholar
Gilligan, Carol. 1982. In a different voice. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Haslanger, Sally. 2008. Changing the ideology and culture of philosophy: Not by reason (alone). Hypatia 23 (2): 21–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Healy, Kieran. 2011. Percentage of Ph.Ds awarded in the U.S. to Women in 2009. http://Source:www.kieranhealy.org/blog/archives/2011/02/04/gender-divides-in-philosophy-and-other-disciplines/ (accessed April 21, 2012).Google Scholar
Lee, Carole J., and Schunn, Christian D. 2010. Philosophy journal practices and opportunities for bias. APA Newsletter on Feminism and Philosophy 10 (1): 5–10.Google Scholar
PhD.org. nd. PhD.org. http://ezp-prod1.hul.harvard.edu/login?url=http://www.phds.org/ (accessed September 18, 2011).Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. 2011. Digest of Education Statistics, 2010 (NCES 2011‐015) Table 199.Google Scholar
Van Camp, J. 2010. Tenured/tenure‐track faculty women at 98 U.S. doctoral programs in philosophy. http://www.csulb.edu/~jvancamp/doctoral_2004.html (accessed April 21, 2012).Google Scholar
Walker, Margaret. 2009. Diotima's ghost: The uncertain place of feminist philosophy in professional philosophy. Hypatia 20 (3): 153–64.Google Scholar