Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-qlrfm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-15T17:55:14.207Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

“Power in the service of love”: John Dewey's Logic and the Dream of a Common Language

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 March 2020

Abstract

While contemporary feminist philosophical discussions focus on the oppressiveness of universality which obliterates “difference,” the complete demise of universality might hamper feminist philosophy in its political project of furthering the well-being of all women. Dewey's thoroughly functionalized, relativized, and fallibilized understanding of universality may help us cut universality down to size while also appreciating its limited contribution. Deweyan universality may signify the ongoing search for a genuinely common language in the midst of difference.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © 1993 by Hypatia, Inc.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Chaloupka, William. 1987. John Dewey's social aesthetics as a precedent for environmental thought. Environmental Ethics 9(3): 243–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dewey, John [1903] 1983. Studies in logical theory. Reprinted in John Dewey: The middle works, Vol. 2: 1899–1924, ed. Jo Ann Boydston. Carbondale and Edwardsville: Southern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar
Dewey, John [1915] 1985. The logic of judgments of practice. Reprinted in John Dewey: The middle works, Vol. 8:1899‐1924, ed. Jo Ann Boydston. Carbondale and Edwardsville: Southern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar
Dewey, John [1916] 1980. Introduction to Essays in experimental logic. Reprinted in John Dewey. The middle works, Vol. 10: 1899‐1924, ed. Jo Ann Boydston. Carbondale and Edwardsville: Southern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar
Dewey, John [1919] 1982. Philosophy and democracy. Reprinted in John Dewey: The middle works, Vol. 11: 1899‐1924, ed. Jo Ann Boydston. Carbondale and Edwardsville: Southern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar
Dewey, John [1920] 1982. Reconstruction in philosophy. Reprinted in John Dewey: The middle works, Vol. 12: 1899‐1924, ed. Jo Ann Boydston. Carbondale and Edwardsville: Southern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar
Dewey, John [1922] 1988. Human nature and conduct. Reprinted in John Dewey: The middle works, Vol. 14: 1899‐1924, ed. Jo Ann Boydston. Carbondale and Edwardsville: Southern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar
Dewey, John [1925] 1981. Experience and nature. Reprinted in John Dewey: The later works, Vol. 1: 1925‐1953, ed. Jo Ann Boydston. Carbondale and Edwardsville: Southern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar
Dewey, John [1929] 1988. The Quest for Certainty. Reprinted in John Dewey: The later works, Vol. 4: 1925‐1953, ed. Jo Ann Boydston. Carbondale and Edwardsville: Southern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar
Dewey, John [1930] 1984. Qualitative thought. Reprinted in John Dewey: The later works, Vol. 5: 1925‐1953, ed. Jo Ann Boydston. Carbondale and Edwardsville: Southern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar
Dewey, John [1934] 1987. Art as experience. Reprinted in John Dewey: The later works, Vol. 10: 1925‐1953, ed. Jo Ann Boydston. Carbondale and Edwardsville: Southern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar
Dewey, John [1938] 1986. Logic: The theory of inquiry. Reprinted in John Dewey: The later works, Vol. 12: 1925‐1953, ed. Jo Ann Boydston. Carbondale and Edwardsville: Southern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar
Dewey, John [1939] 1988. Experience, knowledge and value: A rejoinder. Reprinted in John Dewey: The later works, Vol. 14: 1925‐1953, ed. Jo Ann Boydston. Carbondale and Edwardsville: Southern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar
Dewey, John [1948] 1982. Introduction: Reconstruction as seen twenty‐five years later. Reprinted in John Dewey: The middle works, Vol. 12: 1899‐1924, ed. Jo Ann Boydston. Carbondale and Edwardsville: Southern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar
Fraser, Nancy and Nicholson, Linda. 1990. Social criticism without philosophy: An encounter between feminism, and postmodernism. In Feminism/postmodernism, ed. Nicholson, Linda. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Nye, Andrea. 1990. Words of power: A feminist reading of the history of logic. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Pepper, Stephen C. 1939. Questions on Dewey's esthetics. In The philosophy of John Dewey, ed. Schilpp, Paul Arthur. Evanston and Chicago: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
Rorty, Richard. 1982. Method, social science, and social hope. In Consequences of pragmatism. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Rorty, Richard. 1991a. Heidegger, contingency and pragmatism. In Essays on Heidegger and others. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rorty, Richard. 1991b. Introduction: Antirepresentationalism, ethnocentrism, and liberalism. In Objectivity, relativism, and truth. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rorty, Richard. 1991c. Is natural science a natural kind? In Objectivity, relativism, and truth. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rorty, Richard. 1991d. Solidarity or objectivity? In Objectivity, relativism, and truth. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar