Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-04T21:57:55.174Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Pornography and Degradation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 March 2020

Abstract

I have taken a Kantian approach to the issue of pornography and degradation. My thesis is that by perpetuating derogatory myths about womankind, for the sake of financial gain, the pornography industry treats the class of women as a means only, and not as composed of individuals who are ends in themselves. It thus de-grades all women, as members of this class, imputing to them less than full human status.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © 1987 by Hypatia, Inc.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Berger, Fred. 1977. Pornography, sex, and censorship. Social Theory and Practice 4 (2): 183210.10.5840/soctheorpract19774216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dworkin, Andrea. 1981. Pornography: Men possessing women. New York: Perigee Books.Google Scholar
Feinberg, Joel. 1980. Harmless immoralities and offensive nuisances. In Rights, justice and the bounds of liberty. Princeton: Princeton University Press.10.1515/9781400853977CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldman, Emma. 1983. Living my life. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
Hentoff, Nat. 1984. War on pornography. The Washington Post, 31 August, p. A21.Google Scholar
Hill, Thomas. 1973. Servility and self‐respect. The Monist 57 (1): 87104.10.5840/monist197357135CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reisman, David. 1942. Democracy and defamation: Control on group libel. Columbia Law Review 42 (5).Google Scholar
Shipp, E.R. 1984. Federal judge hears arguments on validity of Indianapolis pornography measure. New York Times, 31 July, p. A10.Google Scholar
Styron, William. 1979. Sophie's choice. New York: Random House.Google Scholar