Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T05:15:18.087Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Politics of Sex and Gender: Benhabib and Butler Debate Subjectivity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 March 2020

Fiona Webster
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper responds to the sense of “crisis” or “trouble” that dominates contemporary feminist debate about the categories of sex and gender. It argues that this perception of crisis has emerged from a fundamental confusion of theoretical and political issues concerning the implications of the sex/gender debate for political representation and agency. It explores the sense in which this confusion is manifest in a debate between Seyla Benhabib and Judith Butler.

Type
Research Article
Information
Hypatia , Volume 15 , Issue 1 , Winter 2000 , pp. 1 - 22
Copyright
Copyright © 2000 by Hypatia, Inc.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alcoff, Linda. 1988. Cultural feminism versus post‐structuralism: The identity crisis in feminist theory. In Reconstructing the academy: Women's education and women's studies, ed. Minnich, E., O'Burr, J., and Rosenfield, R.Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Bartky, Sandra. 1995. Agency: What's the problem? In Provoking agents: Gender and agency in theory and practice, ed. Gardiner, J. Kegan. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Benhabib, Seyla. 1986. Critique, norm and Utopia: A study of the foundations of critical theory. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Benhabib, Seyla. 1992. Situating the self: Gender, community and postmodernism in contemporary ethics. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Benhabib, Seyla. 1995a. Feminism and postmodernism: An uneasy alliance. In Feminist contentions: A philosophical exchange, ed. Benhabib, S., Butler, J., Cornell, D., and Fraser, N.New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Benhabib, Seyla. 1995b. Subjectivity, historiography, and politics: Reflections on the feminism/postmodernism exchange. In Feminist contentions: A philosophical exchange, ed. Benhabib, S., Butler, J., Cornell, D., and Fraser, N.New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Benhabib, Seyla, Butler, Judith, Cornell, Drucilla, and Fraser, Nancy, eds. 1995. Feminist contentions: A philosophical exchange. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bordo, Susan.1992. Postmodern subjects, postmodern bodies. Feminist Studies 18 (1): 159–75.Google Scholar
Brown, Wendy.1991. Feminist hesitations, postmodern exposures, differences 3 (1): 63–84.Google Scholar
Brown, Wendy. 1995. States of injury: Power and freedom in late modernity. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Butler, Judith. 1986. Sex and gender in The second sex. Yale French Studies 72: 35–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butler, Judith. 1990. Gender trouble: Feminism and the subversion of identity. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Butler, Judith. 1993. Bodies that matter: On the discursive limits of sex. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Butler, Judith. 1995a. Burning acts: Injurious speech. In Deconstruction is/in America: A new sense of the political, ed. Haverkamp, A.New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Butler, Judith. 1995b. Contingent foundations: Feminism and the question of “postmodernism.” In Feminist contentions: A philosophical exchange, ed. Benhabib, S., Butler, J., Cornell, D., and Fraser, N.New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Butler, Judith. 1995c. For a careful reading. In Feminist contentions: A philosophical exchange, ed. Benhabib, S., Butler, J., Cornell, D., and Fraser, N.New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Butler, Judith. 1997a. Excitable speech: A politics of the performative. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Butler, Judith. 1997b. The psychic life of power. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Butler, Judith and Scott, Joan, eds. 1992. Feminists theorize the political. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Cornell, Drucilla. 1995. What is ethical feminism? In Feminist contentions: A philosophical exchange, ed. Benhabib, S., Butler, J., Cornell, D., and Fraser, N.New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Fraser, Nancy. 1995. False antithesis: A response to Seyla Benhabib and Judith Butler. In Feminist contentions: A philosophical exchange, ed. Benhabib, S., Butler, J., Cornell, D., and Fraser, N.New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hekman, Susan.1995a. Review of Unbearable weight: Feminism, culture and the body and Bodies that matter. Hypatia 10 (4): 151–57.Google Scholar
Hekman, Susan. 1995b. Subjects and agents: The question for feminism. In Provoking agents; Gender and agency in theory and practice, ed. Gardiner, J. Kegan. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Laclau, Ernest., and Mouffe, Chantal 1985. Hegemony and socialist strategy: Toward a radical democratic politics. Trans. Moore, W. and Cammack, P.London: Verso.Google Scholar
Mouffe, Chantal. 1988. Radical democracy: Modern or postmodern? In Universal abandon: The politics of postmodernism, ed. Ross, A.Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Mouffe, Chantal. 1992. Feminism, citizenship and radical democratic politics. In Feminists theorize the political, ed. Butler, J. and Scott, J.New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Nicholson, Linda, ed. 1990. Feminism/postmodernism. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Riley, Denise. 1988. “Am I that name?”Feminism and the category of “women” in history. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Schweickart, Patricia. 1995. What are we doing? What do we want? Who are we? Comprehending the subject of feminism. In Provoking agents: Gender and agency in theory and practice, ed. Gardiner, J. Kegan. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar