Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T06:20:46.321Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Partial Defense of Illocutionary Silencing

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 March 2020

Mary Kate McGowan ,
Alexandra Adelman ,
Sara Helmers  and
Jacqueline Stolzenberg
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Catharine MacKinnon has pioneered a new brand of anti-pornography argument. In particular, MacKinnon claims that pornography silences women in a way that violates their right to free speech. In what follows, we focus on a certain account of silencing put forward by Jennifer Hornsby and Rae Langton, and we defend that account against two important objections. The first objection contends that this account makes a crucial but false assumption about the necessary role of hearer recognition in successful speech acts. In response, we argue that, as silencing primarily concerns communication, Hornsby and Langton are perfectly correct to treat hearer recognition as they do. The second objection contends that their particular account of silencing has the unacceptable result of undermining the responsibility of rapists. We here argue that no such result follows from their account.

Type
CLUSTER: SEXUAL EXPRESSIONS
Information
Hypatia , Volume 26 , Issue 1 , Winter 2011 , pp. 132 - 149
Copyright
Copyright © 2011 by Hypatia, Inc.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Austin, J.L. 1975. How to do things with words. 2nd ed. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bird, Alexander. 2002. Illocutionary silencing. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 83 (1): 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Curley, Edwin M. 1976. Excusing rape. Philosophy and Public Affairs 5 (4): 325–60.Google Scholar
Hornsby, Jennifer. 1993. Speech acts and pornography. Women's Philosophy Review 10:38–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hornsby, Jennifer. 1995. Disempowered speech. Philosophical Topics 23 (2): 127–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hornsby, Jennifer, and Langton, Rae. 1998. Free speech and illocution. Legal Theory 4:21–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacobson, Daniel. 1995. Freedom of speech acts? A response to Langton. Philosophy and Public Affairs 24 (1): 64–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Langton, Rae. 1993. Speech acts and unspeakable acts. Philosophy and Public Affairs 22 (4): 293–330.Google Scholar
Langton, Rae. 1998. Subordination, silence, and pornography's authority. In Censorship and silencing: Practices of cultural regulation, ed. Post, Robert C.Los Angeles: Getty Research Institute for the History of Art and the Humanities.Google Scholar
Langton, Rae. 1999. Pornography: A liberal's unfinished business. Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence 12:109–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacKinnon, Catharine. 1987. Feminism unmodified: Discourses on life and law. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
MacKinnon, Catharine. 1993. Only words. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Maitra, Ishani. 2004. Silence and responsibility. Philosophical Perspectives 18 (1): 189–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maitra, Ishani. 2009. Silencing speech. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 39 (2): 309–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maitra, Ishani., and McGowan, Mary Kate. 2009. On silencing, rape and responsibility. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 88 (1): 167–72.Google Scholar
McGowan, Mary Kate. 2003. Conversational exercitives and the force of pornography. Philosophy and Public Affairs 31 (2): 155–89.10.1111/j.1088-4963.2003.00155.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGowan, Mary Kate. 2009. On silencing and sexual refusal. Journal of Political Philosophy 17 (4): 487–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Searle, John. 1969. Speech acts: An essay in the philosophy of language. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Searle, John. 1979. Expression and meaning: Studies in the theory of speech acts. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
West, Caroline. 2003. The free speech argument against pornography. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 33 (3): 391–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wieland, Nellie. 2007. Linguistic authority and convention in a speech act analysis of pornography. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 85 (3): 435–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar