Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T02:58:29.018Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Multiple Moving Perceptions of the Real: Arendt, Merleau-Ponty, and Truitt

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 March 2020

Helen A. Fielding
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper explores the ethical insights provided by Anne Truitt's minimalist sculptures, as viewed through the phenomenological lenses of Hannah Arendt's investigations into the co-constitution of reality and Maurice Merleau-Ponty's investigations into perception. Artworks in their material presence can lay out new ways of relating and perceiving. Truitt's works accomplish this task by revealing the interactive motion of our embodied relations and how material objects can actually help to ground our reality and hence human potentiality. Merleau-Ponty shows how our prereflective bodies allow incompossible perceptions to coexist. Yet this same capacity of bodies to gather multiple perceptions together also lends itself to the illusion that we see from only one perspective. If an ethical perspective becomes reified into one position, it then becomes detached from reality, and the ethical potential is actually lost. At the same time, phenomenologically understood, the real world does not exist in terms of static matter, but is instead a web of contextual relations and meanings. An ethics that does not take embodied relations into account—that allows for only one perspective—ultimately loses its capacity for flexibility, and for being part of a common and shared reality.

Type
Creating Ethical Spaces
Information
Hypatia , Volume 26 , Issue 3: Special Issue: Ethics of Embodiment , Summer 2011 , pp. 518 - 534
Copyright
Copyright © 2011 by Hypatia, Inc.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adams, Katherine. 2002. At the table with Arendt: Toward a self‐interested practice of coalition discourse. Hypatia 17 (1): 1–33.10.1111/j.1527-2001.2002.tb00677.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Agamben, Giorgio. 1999. On potentiality. InPotentialities. Trans. Daniel Heller‐Roazen. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Al‐Saji, Alia. 2009. A phenomenology of critical‐ethical vision: Merleau‐Ponty, Bergson, and the question of seeing differently. Chiasmi International 11:375–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arendt, Hannah. 1952. The origins of totalitarianism. New York: Harcourt Brace.Google Scholar
Arendt, Hannah. 1958. The human condition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Arendt, Hannah. 1994. Understanding and politics. In Essays in understanding, ed. Kohn, Jerome. New York: Schocken Books.Google Scholar
Bauby, Jean Dominique. 1997. The diving bell and the butterfly. Trans. Jeremy Leggatt. London: Fourth Estate.Google Scholar
Birmingham, Peg. 2008. Elated citizenry: Deception and the democratic task of bearing witness. Research in phenomenology 38 (2): 198–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
CohenJem, Director. Jem, Director. 2008. Anne Truitt: Working. 16mm film. 13 minutes. Brooklyn: Gravity Hill Farms.Google Scholar
Fanon, Frantz. 1967. Black skin, white masks. Trans. Charles Lam Markmann. New York: Grove Press.Google Scholar
Fielding, Helen A. 2006. White logic and the constancy of color. In Feminist interpretations of Merleau‐Ponty, ed. Olkowski, Dorothea and Weiss, Gail. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
Heidegger, Martin. 1998. Letter on humanism. In Pathmarks, ed. McNeill, William. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511812637CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hileman, Kristen. 2009. Presence and abstraction. In Anne Truitt: Perception and reflection, ed. Hileman, Kristen. Washington, D.C.: Hirshhorn Museum and Sculpture Garden.Google Scholar
Mallin, Samuel B. 1996. Art line thought. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merleau‐Ponty, Maurice. 1964a. Eye and mind. In The primacy of perception. Trans. Carleton Dallery. Evanston, Ill.: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
Merleau‐Ponty, Maurice. 1964b. The philosopher and his shadow. Trans. Richard C. McCleary. In Signs. Evanston, Ill.: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
Merleau‐Ponty, Maurice. 1968. The visible and the invisible. Trans. Alphonso Lingis. Evanston, Ill.: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
Merleau‐Ponty, Maurice. 2002a. Husserl at the limits of phenomenology, ed. Lawlor, Len. Evanston, Ill.: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
Merleau‐Ponty, Maurice. 2002b. Phenomenology of perception. Trans. Collin Smith. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merleau‐Ponty, Maurice. 2007. The Merleau‐Ponty reader, ed. Toadvine, Ted and Lawlor, Leonard. Evanston, Ill.: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
Meyer, James. 2009. The bicycle. In Anne Truitt: Perception and reflection, ed. Hileman, Kristen. Washington, D.C.: Hirshhorn Museum and Sculpture Garden.Google Scholar
Thompson, Evan, Palacios, Adrian, and Varela, Francisco J. 2002. Ways of coloring: Comparative color vision as a case study for cognitive science. In Vision and mind, ed. Noë, Alva and Thompson, Evan. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Truitt, Anne. 1977. First requiem. Acrylic on wood. 90 x 8 x 8 in.Google Scholar
Truitt, Anne. 1982. Daybook: The journal of an artist. New York: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Truitt, Anne. 1986. Turn: The Journal of an Artist. New York: Viking Penguin Inc.Google Scholar
Truitt, Anne. 1997. Elixir. Acrylic on wood. 82 x 8 x 8 in.Google Scholar
Truitt, Anne. 1999. View. Acrylic on wood. 82 x 8 x 8 in.Google Scholar
Truitt, Anne. 2002. Viking. Acrylic on wood. 82 x 8 x 8 in.Google Scholar
Truitt, Anne. 2004a. Evensong. Acrylic on wood. 82 x 8 x 8 in.Google Scholar
Truitt, Anne. 2004b. Return. Acrylic on wood. 81 x 8 x 8 in.Google Scholar
Vasterling, Veronica. 2011. Contingency, newness, and freedom: Arendt's recovery of the temporal condition of politics. In Time in feminist phenomenology, ed. Schües, Christina, Olkowski, Dorothea, and Fielding, Helen A.Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Wagner, Anne M. 2010. Anne Truitt: Disarming time. Artforum (January): 150–55.Google Scholar
Young, Iris Marion. 1990. Throwing like a girl. In Throwing like a girl and other essays in feminist philosophy and social theory. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar