Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T05:40:01.520Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Mother Love, Maternal Ambivalence, and the Possibility of Empowered Mothering

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2020

Abstract

Dominant cultural ideologies of motherhood define the nature of mother love. Recent developments in motherhood studies, and the work of a small number of feminist philosophers and scholars of motherhood, have challenged the tenets of these ideologies by daring to speak the “unspeakable”: that mother love is often and for all mothers, whether consciously or not, permeated by powerful negative and conflicting emotions termed maternal ambivalence. In this essay, relying on recorded personal narratives by Bosnian women who are raising children born of wartime rape, as well as recent studies on empowered motherhood, my aim is to show that maternal love, like love in any other close relationship, encompasses and assimilates healthy ambivalence, and can inform maternal care in a constructive and positive manner. I argue that the acknowledgment of healthy maternal ambivalence as an integral aspect of mother love involves honoring the mother's subjectivity and validates her personhood, and as such it opens up the possibility of redefining mother love in terms that are empowering to mothers.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © 2017 by Hypatia, Inc.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allen, Jeffner. 1984. Motherhood: The annihilation of women. In Mothering: Essays in feminist theory, ed. Treblicot, Joyce. Totowa, N.J.: Rowman and Allanheld.Google Scholar
Anderson, Kim. 2007. Giving life to the people: An indigenous ideology of motherhood. In Maternal theory: Essential readings, ed. O'Reilly, Andrea. Toronto: Demeter Press.Google Scholar
Atkinson, Ti‐Grace. 2001. Radical feminism and love (1974). In Women and romance: A reader, ed. Ostrov Weisser, Susan. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Bećirbašić, Belma. 2006. Invisible casualties of war. Institute for war and peace, September 6. http://bosnia.org.uk/news/news_body.cfm?newsid=1666 (accessed 12 September, 2014).Google Scholar
Brown, Ivana. 2010. Ambivalence of the motherhood experience. In Twenty‐first‐century motherhood: Experience, identity, policy, agency, ed. O'Reilly, Andrea. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Bryson, Valerie. 2013. Time to love. In Love: A question for feminism in the twenty‐first century, ed. Jónasdóttir, Anna G. and Ferguson, Ann. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Christie, George, and Correia, Anna. 1987. Maternal ambivalence in a group analytic setting. British Journal of Psychotherapy 3 (3): 205–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collins, Patricia Hill. 1993. The meaning of motherhood in black culture and black mother–daughter relationships. In Double stitch: Black women write about mothers and daughters, ed. Bell‐Scott, Patricia, Guy‐Sheftall, Beverly, Jones Royster, Jacqueline, Sims‐Wood, Janet, DeCosta‐Willis, Miriam, and Fultz, Lucie. New York: Harper Perennial.Google Scholar
Dally, Ann. 1982. Inventing motherhood: The consequences of an ideal. London: Burnett Books Ltd.Google Scholar
Davies, Linda. 2008. Omnipotence in child protection: Making room for ambivalence. Journal of Social Work Practice 22 (2): 141–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, Glenn. 1976. Childhood and history in America. New York: Psychohistory Press.Google Scholar
Douglas, Susan J., and Michaels, Meredith W. 2007. The new momism. In Maternal theory: Essential readings, ed. O'Reilly, Andrea. Toronto: Demeter Press.Google Scholar
Ferguson, Ann, and Jónasdóttir, Anna G. 2013. Introduction. In Love: A question for feminism in the twenty‐first century, ed. Jónasdóttir, Anna G. and Ferguson, Ann. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Gilligan, Carol. 1982. In a different voice: Psychological theory and women's development. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Hays, Sharon. 1996. The cultural contradictions of motherhood. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Hoffman, Leon. 2003. Mothers’ ambivalence with their babies and toddlers: Manifestations of conflicts with aggression. Journal of the American Psychoanalytical Association 51 (4): 1219–40.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Holt, Kate, and Hughes, Sarah. 2005. Bosnia's rape babies: Abandoned by their families, forgotten by the state. The Independent, December 13. http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/europe/bosnias-rape-babies-abandoned-by-their-families-forgotten-by-the-state-519257.html (accessed September 2, 2014).Google Scholar
hooks, bell. 1990. Homeplace: A site of resistance. In Yearning: Race, gender, and cultural politics. Boston: South End Books.Google Scholar
Horwitz, Erika. 2004. Resistance as a site of empowerment: The journey away from maternal sacrifice. In Mother outlaws: Theories and practices of empowered mothering, ed. O'Reilly, Andrea. Toronto: Women's Press.Google Scholar
LaChance Adams, Sarah. 2014. Mad mothers, bad mothers, and what a “good” mother would do: The ethics of ambivalence. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Lowe, Leyna. 2013. Revolutionary love: Feminism, love, and the transformative politics of freedom in the works of Wollstonecraft, Beauvoir, and Goldman. In Love: A question for feminism in the twenty‐first century, ed. Jónasdóttir, Anna G. and Ferguson, Ann. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Noddings, Nel. 1984. Caring: A feminine approach to ethics and moral education. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
O'Reilly, Andrea. 2004. Introduction. In Mother outlaws: Theories and practices of empowered mothering, ed. O'Reilly, Andrea. Toronto: Women's Press.Google Scholar
O'Reilly, Andrea, ed. 2008. Feminist mothering. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Overall, Christina. 2013. Why have children: The ethical debate. Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Parker, Rozsika. 1995. Torn in two: The experience of maternal ambivalence. London: Virago Press.Google Scholar
Raphael‐Leff, Joan. 2010. Mothers’ and fathers’ orientations: Patterns of pregnancy, parenting, and the bonding process. In Parenthood and mental health: A bridge between infant and adult psychiatry, ed. Tyano, Sam, Kereen, Miri, Herman, Helen, and Cox, John. Hoboken, N.J.: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Rich, Adrienne. 1976. Of woman born: Motherhood as experience and institution. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Ruddick, Sara. 1989. Maternal thinking: Toward a politics of peace. New York: Ballantine Books.Google Scholar
Sedgwick, Eve Kosofsky. 2003. Paranoid reading and reparative reading, or, you're so paranoid, you probably think this essay is about you. In Touching feeling: Affect, pedagogy, performativity. Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simpson, Leanne. 2006. Birthing an indigenous resurgence: Decolonizing our pregnancy and birthing ceremonies. In “Until our hearts are on the ground”: Aboriginal mothering, oppression, resistance and rebirth, ed. Memee Lavell‐Harvard, D. and Corbiere Lavell, Jeannette. Toronto: Demeter Press.Google Scholar
Stacey, Jackie. 2014. Wishing away ambivalence. Feminist Theory 15 (1): 3949.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stone, Alison. 2011. Feminism, psychoanalysis, and maternal subjectivity. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Takševa, Tatjana. 2015. Raising children born of wartime rape in Bosnia: A maternal philosophy perspective. In Mothers under fire: Mothering in conflict areas, ed. Takševa, Tatjana and Sgoutas, Arlene. Toronto: Demeter Press.Google Scholar
Toomey, Christine. 2003. Cradle of inhumanity. The Sunday Times, November 3. http://www.thesundaytimes.co.uk/sto/style/article27198 (accessed September 17, 2014).Google Scholar
Tremonti, Anna Maria. 2012. Born of war. Audio blog post. The Current. CBC Radio, April 3. (accessed September 10, 2014).Google Scholar
Tronto, Joan. 1993. Moral boundaries: A political argument for an ethics of care. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Wiegman, Robyn. 2013. Object lessons. Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press.Google Scholar