Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T20:43:55.021Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Moral Significance of Birth

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 March 2020

Mary Anne Warren
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Does birth make a difference to the moral rights of the fetus /infant? Should it make a difference to its legal rights? Most contemporary philosophers believe that birth cannot make a difference to moral rights. If this is true, then it becomes difficult to justify either a moral or a legal distinction between late abortion and infanticide. I argue that the view that birth is irrelevant to moral rights rests upon two highly questionable assumptions about the theoretical foundations of moral rights. If we reject these assumptions, then we are free to take account of the contrasting biological and social relationships that make even relatively late abortion morally different from infanticide.

Type
Research Article
Information
Hypatia , Volume 4 , Issue 3: Special Issue: Ethics and Reproduction , Fall 1989 , pp. 46 - 65
Copyright
Copyright © 1989 by Hypatia, Inc.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Annas, George. 1982. Forced cesareans: The most unkindest cut. Hastings Center Report June 12: 3. The Australian, Tuesday, July 5, 1988, 5.Google ScholarPubMed
Callahan, Daniel. 1970. Abortion: Law, choice and morality. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Callahan, Sydney. 1984. Value choices in abortion. In Abortion: Understanding differences. Callahan, Sydney and Callahan, Daniel eds., New York and London: Plenum Press.10.1007/978-1-4613-2753-0CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Callahan, Sydney. 1986. Abortion and the sexual agenda. Commonweal, April 25, 232–238.Google Scholar
Gilligan, Carol. 1982. In a different voice: Psychological theory and women's development. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Guttentag, Marcia, and Paul Secord. 1983. Too many women: The sex ratio question. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Harrison, Beverly Wildung. 1983. Our right to choose: Toward a new ethic of abortion. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Jaini, Padmanab S. 1979. The jaina path of purification. Berkeley, Los Angeles, London: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Lomansky, Loren. 1984. Being a person—does it matter? In The problem of abortion. Feinberg, Joel ed., Belmont, California.Google Scholar
Luker, Kristen. 1984. Abortion and the politics of motherhood. Berkeley, Los Angeles and London: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Manning, Rita. 1988. Caring for and caring about. Paper presented at conference entitled Explorations in Feminist Ethics, Duluth, Minnesota October 8.Google Scholar
Mead, Margaret. [1935] 1963. Sex and temperament in three primitive societies. New York: Morrow Quill Paperbacks.Google Scholar
Noddings, Nell. 1984. Caring: A feminine approach to ethics and moral education. Berkeley, Los Angeles and London: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Petchesky, Rosalind Pollack. 1984. Abortion and women's choice. New York, London: Longman.Google Scholar
Piers, Maria W. 1978. Infanticide. New York: W.W. Norton and Company.Google Scholar
Singer, Peter. 1981. The expanding circle: Ethics and sociobiology. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.Google Scholar
Stone, Christopher. 1974. Should trees have standing: Towards legal rights for natural objects. Los Altos: William Kaufman.Google Scholar
Stone, Christopher. 1987. Earth and other ethics. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Sumner, L. W. 1983. Abortion and moral theory. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Taylor, Paul W. 1986. Respect for nature: A theory of environmental ethics. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Thomson, Judith Jarvis. 1971. A defense of abortion. Philosophy and Public Affairs 1 (1): 47–66.Google Scholar
Tooley, Michael. 1983. Abortion and infanticide. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wolgast, Elizabeth. 1987. The grammar of justice. Ithaca & London: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar