Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T19:09:21.123Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The “Meta” Level of Integrity: Integrity in the Context of Structural Injustice

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2020

Jessica Payson
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This essay argues for a new, “meta,” level of integrity that is created by the context of structural injustice. The essay will draw from Margaret Walker to bring out a defining social value of integrity, namely, its ability to facilitate reliable response to harms caused by “moral luck.” The essay will then argue that, when bad luck is caused by complex social‐structural function, traditional advice for maintaining one's integrity fails to provide adequate guidance; following such advice facilitates unjust social‐structural function, and so unreliability in response to harm. The essay will address this problem by arguing that in the context of structural injustice, a “meta‐level” meaning of integrity emerges. This new meta‐level of integrity, unlike the more traditional first‐level integrity, does not instruct an individual to disassociate herself from structural harms; instead, it instructs an individual to manage the way in which she participates in unjust social structures. Meta‐level integrity, unlike first‐level integrity, does not facilitate an end to structural harm, but it does promote a reliable presence of social‐justice movements within unjust structures.

Type
Articles
Information
Hypatia , Volume 32 , Issue 2 , Spring 2017 , pp. 347 - 362
Copyright
Copyright © 2017 by Hypatia, Inc.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Calhoun, Cheshire. 1995. Standing for something. Journal of Philosophy 92 (5): 235–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Card, Claudia. 1996. The unnatural lottery: Character and moral luck. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
Crenshaw, Kimberlé. 1991. Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. Stanford Law Review 43 (6): 1241–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davion, Victoria. 1991. Integrity and radical change. In Feminist ethics, ed. Card, Claudia. Lawrence: University of Kansas Press.Google Scholar
Frankfurt, Harry. 1987. Identification and wholeheartedness. In Responsibility, character, and the emotions: New essays in moral psychology, ed. Schoeman, Ferdinand. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lugones, Maria. 1994. Purity, impurity, and separation. Signs 19 (2): 458–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McFall, Lynn. 1987. Integrity. Ethics 98 (1): 5–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mills, Charles. 1997. The racial contract. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Tessman, Lisa. 2005. Burdened virtues. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walker, Margaret. 2003. Moral contexts. Lanham, Md.: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Williams, Bernard. 1981. Moral luck: Philosophical papers 1973–1980. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Young, Iris Marion. 2006. Responsibility and global justice: A social connection model. Social Philosophy & Policy 23 (1): 102–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Young, Iris Marion. 2011. Responsibility for justice. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar