Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T20:59:56.987Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Look of Love

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 March 2020

Kelly Oliver
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

I begin to suggest an alternative to the notion of vision based in alienation and hostility put forth by Jean-Paul Sartre, Sigmund Freud, and Jacques Lacan. I diagnose this alienating vision as a result of a particular alienating notion of space presupposed by their theories. I develop lrigaray's comments about light and air to suggest an alternative notion of space that opens up the possibility that vision connects us to others rather than alienates us from them.

Type
Research Article
Information
Hypatia , Volume 16 , Issue 3 , Summer 2001 , pp. 56 - 78
Copyright
Copyright © 2001 by Hypatia, Inc.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

De Beauvoir, Simone. 1980. The ethics of ambiguity. Trans. Frechtman, Bernard. Secaucus, N.J.: Citadel Press.Google Scholar
Edelstein, Marilyn. 1998. What's love got to do with it? Paper read at Modern Language Association, 27 December, San Francisco.Google Scholar
Freud, Sigmund. 1962. Three essays on the theory of sexuality. Trans. Strachey, James. Basic Books: New York.Google Scholar
Freud, Sigmund. 1972a. The passing of the Oedipus‐complex. In Sexuality and the psychology of love, trans. Riviere, Joan. New York: Collier Books.Google Scholar
Freud, Sigmund. 1972b. Some psychological consequences of the anatomical distinction between the sexes. In Sexuality and the psychology of love, trans. Riviere, Joan. New York: Collier Books.Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. 1977. Phenomenology of spirit. Trans. Miller, A. V.Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Held, Rene. 1952. ‘Psychopathologie du regard’ Levolution psychiatrique (April‐June): 226–29.Google Scholar
Hooks, Bell. 1994. Outlaw culture: Resisting representations. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Irigaray, Luce. 1991. Marine lover of Friedrich Nietzsche. Trans. Gill, Gillian. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Irigaray, Luce. 1992. Elemental passions. Trans. Collie, Joanne and Still, Judith. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Irigaray, Luce. 1993a. An ethics of sexual difference. Trans. Burke, Carolyn and Gill, Gillian. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Irigaray, Luce. 1993b. Sexes and genealogies. Trans. Gill, Gillian. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Irigaray, Luce. 1996. i love to you. Trans. Martin, Alison. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Irigaray, Luce. 1997. Etre deux. Paris: Grasset.Google Scholar
Irigaray, Luce. 1999. Forgetting of air in Martin Heidegger. Trans. Mader, Mary Beth. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Jay, Martin. 1994. Downcast eyes: The denigration of vision in twentieth Century French thought. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Kristeva, Julia. 1987. Tales of love. Trans. Roudiez, Leon. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Lacan, Jacques. 1977a. Desire and the interpretation of desire in Hamiet. Yale French Studies 55/56: 276.Google Scholar
Lacan, Jacques. 1977b. Ecrits. Trans. Sheridan, Alan. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Lacan, Jacques. 1981. The four fundamental concepts of psychoanalysis. Trans. Sheridan, Alan. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Levinas, Emmanuel. 1987. Time and the other. Trans. Cohen, Richard. Pittsburgh: Duquesne University Press.Google Scholar
Levinas, Emmanuel. 1991. Otherwise than being. Trans. Lingis, Alphonso. Boston: Nijoff.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levinas, Emmanuel. 1993. Collected philosophical papers. Trans. Lingis, Alphonso. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
Levinas, Emmanuel. 1996. Emmanuel Levinas: Basic philosophical writings. Ed. Peperzak, AdrianCritchley, Simon, and Bernasconi, Robert. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Melville, Stephen. 1996. Division of the gaze, or, remarks on the color and tenor of contemporary “theory.” In Vision in context, ed. Brennan, Teresa and Jay, Martin. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Merleau‐Ponty, Maurice. 1964. The primacy of perception. Ed. Edie, James. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
Merleau‐Ponty, Maurice. 1968. The visible and the invisible. Trans. Lingis, Alphonso. Evanston: North‐western University Press.Google Scholar
Oliver, Kelly. 2001. Witnessing: Beyond recognition. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Sartre, Jean‐Paul. 1956. Being and nothingness. Trans. Barnes, Hazel. New York: Washington Square Books.Google Scholar
Sartre, Jean‐Paul. 1976. No exit. Trans. Gilbert, Stuart. New York: Alfred Knoff.Google Scholar
Vasseleu, Cathryn. 1998. Textures of light: Vision and touch in bigamy, Levinas and Merleau‐Ponty. London: Routledge.Google Scholar