Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T22:23:36.877Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Is Longino's Conception of Objectivity Feminist?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 March 2020

Daniel Hicks
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Helen Longino's account of objectivity has been highly regarded by both feminist and mainstream philosophers of science. However, I have encountered three feminist philosophers who have all offered one especially compelling feminist critique of Longino's view: far from vindicating or privileging the work of feminist scientists, Longino's account actually requires the active cultivation of anti-feminist and misogynist scientists to balance out the possibility of feminist bias. I call this objection the Nazi problem, for the particular version that claims that her view requires even the active cultivation of Nazi scientists in objective inquiry. In this paper I consider one response to the Nazi problem, which I call the good faith argument. I show that the good faith argument itself is just as objectionable, on feminist grounds, as the Nazi problem it is meant to address.

Type
Epistemic Justice, Ignorance, and Procedural Objectivity
Information
Hypatia , Volume 26 , Issue 2 , Spring 2011 , pp. 333 - 351
Copyright
Copyright © 2011 by Hypatia, Inc.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

al‐Faruqi, Lois Lamya 1983. Islamic traditions and the feminist movement: Confrontation and cooperation. The Islamic quarterly 27 (3): 135–9.Google Scholar
Biddle, Justin. 2009. Advocates or unencumbered selves? On the role of Mill's political liberalism in Longino's sociopragmatism. Philosophy of Science 76 (5): 612–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fricker, Miranda. 2003. Epistemic injustice and a role for virtue in the politics of knowing. Metaphilosophy 34 (1–2): 154–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hartsock, Nancy. 2004. The feminist standpoint: Developing the ground for a specifically feminist historical materialism. In The feminist standpoint theory reader, ed. Harding, Sandra. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Intemann, Kristen. 2005. Feminism, underdetermination, and values in science. Philosophy of Science 72 (5): 1001–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jaggar, Alison. 1983. Feminist politics and human nature. Lanham, Md: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Jaggar, Alison. 2004. Feminist politics and epistemology: The standpoint of women. In The feminist standpoint theory reader, ed. Harding, Sandra. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kourany, Janet. 1998. A new program for philosophy of science, in many voices. In Philosophy in a feminist voice: Critiques and reconstructions, ed. Kourany, Janet. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Kuhn, Thomas. 1977. Objectivity, value judgment, and theory choice. In The essential tension. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Longino, Helen. 1990. Science as social knowledge. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Longino, Helen. 1995. Gender, politics, and the theoretical virtues. Synthese 104 (3): 383–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Longino, Helen. 1996. Cognitive and non‐cognitive values in science: Rethinking the dichotomy. In Feminism, science, and the philosophy of science, ed. Nelson, Lynn Hankinson and Nelson, Jack. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
Longino, Helen. 2002. The fate of knowledge. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pels, Dick. 2000. The intellectual as stranger: Studies in spokespersonship. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Proctor, Robert. 1988. Racial hygiene: Medicine under the Nazis. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Ruether, Rosemary Radford. 1972. Liberation theology: Human hope confronts Christian history and American power. Mahwah, N.J.: Paulist Press.Google Scholar
Sandel, Michael. 1994. Review of John Rawls, Political Liberalism. Harvard Law Review 107 (7): 1765–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woodhead, Linda. 1997. Spiritualising the sacred: A critique of feminist theology. Modern theology 13 (2): 191–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wylie, Alison. 2004. Why standpoint matters. In The feminist standpoint theory reader, ed. Harding, Sandra. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar