Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T17:24:05.254Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

In and Out of Terror: The Vertigo of Secularization

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 March 2020

María Pía Lara
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The key concept is “vertigo of secularization.” It relates to the fears that societies experience when understanding the need to ground their political orders as separated from religion. The erosion of values produces vertigos around the world. We need to understand better these kinds of processes because only by doing so can we keep that fear and violence from taking precedence over the hard working tasks of building up a global political community.

Type
Forum on September 11, 2001: Feminist Perspectives on Terrorism
Information
Hypatia , Volume 18 , Issue 1: Special Issue: Feminist Philosophy and the Problem of Evil , Winter 2003 , pp. 183 - 196
Copyright
Copyright © 2003 by Hypatia, Inc.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Arendt, Hannah. 1976. The origins of totalitarianism. New York: Harcourt, Brace, Jovanovich.Google Scholar
Arendt, Hannah. 1992. Lectures on Kant's political philosophy, ed. Beiner, Ronald. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Arendt, Hannah. 1994. Essays in understanding: 1930–1954, ed. Kohn, Jerome. New York: Harcourt Brace and Co.Google Scholar
Beiner, Ronald. 1993. Machiavelli, Hobbes, and Rousseau on civil religion. The Review of Politics. 55(4): 617–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daniel, Bell. 1976. The cultural contradictions of capitalism. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Bellah, Robert N. 1991. Beyond belief: Essays on religion in a post‐traditionalist world. Berkeley, Los Angeles, San Diego: The University of California Press.Google Scholar
Bellah, Robert N.et al. 1985. Habits of the heart: Individualism and commitment in American life. Berkeley, Los Angeles, San Diego: The University of California Press.Google Scholar
Benhabib, Seyla. 2002. Unholy wars. Constellations. 9(1): 34–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burke, Kenneth. 1984. The rhetoric of Hitler's “battle.” In Language and politics, ed. Shapiro, Michael. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Cahill, Thomas. 2002. The one true faith: Is it tolerance? The New York Times, 10 February.Google Scholar
Chivers, C. J., and Rhode, David. 2002. Turning out guerrillas and terrorists to wage holy war. The New York Times, 18 March.Google Scholar
Cohen, Roger. 1998. Hearts grown brutal: Sagas of Sarajevo. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Escalante‐Gonzalbo, Fernando. 2000. La mirada de dios. Barcelona and Mexico: Paidós.Google Scholar
Euben, Roxanne L. 1999. Enemy in the mirror: Islamic fundamentalism and the limits of modern rationalism. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geertz, Clifford. 1968. Islam observed: Religious development in Morocco and Indonesia. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen. 2001a. Glaube, Wissen‐Öffnung. Zum Friedenspreis des deutschen Buchhandels. Frankfurt am Main: Surkhamp Verlag.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen. 2001b. The liberating power of symbols: Philosophical essays, trans. Dews, Peter. Cambridge: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Hobbes, Thomas. 1985. Leviathan, ed. Macpherson, C. B.London: Penguin Books Ltd.Google Scholar
Huntington, Samuel. 1996. The clash of civilizations and the remaking of world order. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
Juergensmeyer, Mark. 2000. Terror in the mind of god: The global rise of religious violence. Berkeley, Los Angeles, San Diego: The University of California Press.Google Scholar
Kant, Emmanuel. 1912. Gesammelte schriften. Berlin: Preussischen Akademie der Wissenschaften.Google Scholar
Kifner, John. 2001. America's Muslim allies: A time of trial. The New York Times, 10 October.Google Scholar
Lewis, Bernard. 2001. The revolt of Islam. The New Yorker (Nov 19): 50–63.Google Scholar
Lewis, Bernard. 2002. What went wrong? Western impact and middle eastern response. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
MacIntyre, Alasdair. 1984. After virtue. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
Mardsen, Peter. 1998. The taliban: War, religion and the new order in Afghanistan. London and New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Miller, Judith. 2001. Bin Laden's media savvy: Expert timing of threats. The New York Times, 8 October.Google Scholar
Rashid, Ahmed. 2000. Taliban. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Rousseau, Jean‐Jacques. 1978. On the social contract, trans. Masters, Judith R. ed. Masters, Roger D.New York: St. Martin's Press.Google Scholar
Rushdie, Salman. 2001. Yes, this is about Islam. The New York Times, 2 November.Google Scholar
Sachs, Susan. 2001. Bin Laden images mesmerize Muslims. The New York Times, 9 October.Google Scholar
Sengupta, Somini. 2001. Turkey's secular experiment. The New York Times, 16 December.Google Scholar
Schmitt, Carl. 1996. The concept of the political. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Stille, Alexander. 2002. Scholars are quietly offering new theories of the Koran. The New York Times, 2 March.Google Scholar
Weber, Max. 1978. Economy and society, ed. Roth, Guenther and Wittich, Claus. Berkeley, Los Angeles, San Diego: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Weber, Max. 1993. The sociology of religion. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Weber, Max. 2002. The Protestant ethic and the “spirit” of capitalism and other writings, trans. and ed. Baehr, Peter and Wells, Gordon C.New York: Penguin Books.Google Scholar