Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T17:23:46.977Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

“Images” of the Female and of the Self: Two Recent Interpretations by Women Authors

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 March 2020

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © 2003 by Hypatia, Inc.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Boccacio, Giovanni. 1963. Concerning famous women. Trans. Guarino, Guido A.New Brunswick, N.J.: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
de Girolami Cheyney, Liana, Craig Faxon, Alicia, and Russo, Kathleen Lucey eds., 2000. Self‐Portraits by women painters. London: Ashgate Press.Google Scholar
Dennett, Daniel C. 1984. Elbow room: The varieties of free will worth wanting. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Meyers, Diana Tietjen. 2002. Gender in the mirror: Cultural imagery and womenapos;s agency. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/0195140419.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nochlin, Linda. 1995. Why are there no great women artists? In The philosophy of art: Readings ancient and modern, ed. Neill, Alex and Ridley, Aaron. New York: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
Taylor, Paul C. 1999. Malcolmapos;s conk and Dantoapos;s colors; Or four logical positions concerning race, beauty, and aesthetics. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 57 (1): 1620.10.2307/432060CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolf, Susan. 1990. Freedom within reason. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar