Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T04:09:33.908Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Gendered Reason: Sex Metaphor and Conceptions of Reason

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 March 2020

Phyllis Rooney
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Reason has regularly been portrayed and understood in terms of images and metaphors that involve the exclusion or denigration of some element—body, passion, nature, instinct—that is cast as “feminine.” Drawing upon philosophical insight into metaphor, I examine the impact of this gendering of reason. I argue that our conceptions of mind, reason, unreason, female, and male have been distorted. The politics of “rational” discourse has been set up in ways that still subtly but powerfully inhibit the voice and agency of women.

Type
Research Article
Information
Hypatia , Volume 6 , Issue 2 , Summer 1991 , pp. 77 - 103
Copyright
Copyright © 1991 by Hypatia, Inc.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aristotle, . 1941. The basic works of Aristotle. McKeon, Richard, ed. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Aristotle, . 1953. Generation of animals. Peck, A. L., trans. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Baier, Annette C. 1985. Rhyme and reason: Reflections on Davidson's version of having reasons. In Action and events: Perspectives on the philosophy of Donald Davidson. LePore, E. and McLaughlin, B. eds. Oxford, New York: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
de Beauvoir, Simone. 1952. The second sex. Parshley, H. M., trans. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.Google Scholar
Belenky, Mary Field, McVicker Clinchy, Blythe, Rule Goldberger, Nancy, and Tarule, Jill Mattuck. 1986. Women's ways of knowing. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Black, Max. 1962. Models and metaphors. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Black, Max. 1979. More about metaphor. In Metaphor and thought. Ortony, A., ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bleier, Ruth. 1984. Science and gender: A critique of biology and its theories on women. New York: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
Bordo, Susan. 1986. The Cartesian masculinization of thought. Signs 11(3): 247–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bordo, Susan. 1987. The flight to objectivity. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Chodorow, Nancy. 1978. The reproduction of mothering. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Code, Lorraine. 1987. Epistemic responsibility. Hanover, N. H.: University Press of New England.Google Scholar
Davidson, Donald. 1982. Paradoxes of irrationality. In Philosophical essays on Freud. Wollheim, R. and Hopkins, J. eds. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Elshtain, Jean Bethke. 1981. Public man, private woman: Women in social and political thought. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Fausto‐Sterling, Anne. 1985. Myths of gender. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Genova, Judith. 1988. Women and the mismeasure of thought. Hypatia 3(1): 101–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilligan, Carol. 1987. Moral orientation and moral development. In Women and moral theory. See Kittay and Meyers 1987.Google Scholar
Grimshaw, Jean. 1986. Philosophy and feminist thinking. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Harding, Sandra. 1982. Is gender a variable in conceptions of rationality? A survey of issues. Dialectica 36(2–3). Reprinted in Beyond domination: New perspectives on women and philosophy, Carol Gould, ed. Totowa, N.J.: Rowman and Allenheld, 1983.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harding, Sandra. 1986. The science question in feminism. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Harding, Sandra, and Hintikka, Merrill B., eds. 1983. Discovering reality: Feminist perspectives on epistemology, metaphysics, methodology, and philosophy of science. Dordrecht: D. Reidel.Google Scholar
Hesse, Mary. 1978. Theory and value in the social sciences. In Action and interpretation: Studies in the philosophy of the social sciences. Hookway, C. and Petit, P. eds. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hesse, Mary. 1980. Revolutions and reconstructions in the philosophy of science. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Holland, Nancy. 1990. Is women's philosophy possible? Savage, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Irigaray, Luce. 1985. Speculum of the other woman. Gill, Gillian, trans. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Jaggar, Alison. 1989. Love and knowledge: Emotion in feminist epistemology. In Women, knowledge, and reality: Explorations in feminist philosophy. Garry, Ann and Pearsall, Marilyn, eds. Boston: Unwin Hyman.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. 1959. Foundations of the metaphysics of morals. Beck, Lewis White, trans. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Keller, Evelyn Fox. 1983. A feeling for the organism: The life and work of Barbara McClintock. San Francisco: Freeman.Google Scholar
Keller, Evelyn Fox. 1985. Reflections on gender and science. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Kittay, Eva Feder. 1988. Woman as metaphor. Hypatia 3(2): 63–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kittay, Eva Feder, and Meyers, Diana T., eds. 1987. Women and moral theory. Totowa, N.J.: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Lakoff, G., and Johnson., M. 1980. Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Lloyd, Genevieve. 1983. Reason, gender, and morality in the history of philosophy. Social Research 50(3): 490–513.Google Scholar
Lloyd, Genevieve. 1984. The man of reason: “Male” and “female” in Western philosophy. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Locke, John. 1975. An essay concerning human understanding. Nidditch, P., ed. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Longino, Helen. 1990. Science as social knowledge: Values and objectivity in scientific inquiry. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Mahowald, Mary Briody. 1978. Philosophy of woman: Classic to current concepts. Indianapolis: Hackett.Google Scholar
Merchant, Carolyn. 1980. The death of nature: Women, ecology, and the scientific revolution. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Moulton, Janice. 1983. A paradigm of philosophy: The adversary method. In Discovering reality. See Harding and Hintikka 1983.Google Scholar
Nye, Andrea. 1990. Words of power: a feminist reading of the history of logic. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Ortner, Sherry B. 1986. Is female to male as nature is to culture? In Women and values: Readings in recent feminist philosophy. Pearsall, Marilyn, ed. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.Google Scholar
Ortony, Andrew. 1979. Metaphor: A multidimensional problem. In Metaphor and thought. Ortony, Andrew, ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Peirce, Charles Sanders. 1982. How to make our ideas clear. In Pragmatism: The classic writings. Thayer, H. S., ed. Indianapolis: Hackett.Google Scholar
Plato, . 1937. The dialogues of Plato. Vols. 1,2. Jowett, B., trans. New York, London: Random House.Google Scholar
Rich, Adrienne. 1979. On lies, secrets, and silence. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
Ruddick, Sara. 1987. Remarks on the sexual politics of reason. In Women and moral theory. See Kittay and Meyers 1987.Google Scholar
Ruddick, Sara. 1989. Maternal thinking: Toward a politics of peace. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Ryle, Gilbert. 1949. The concept of mind. New York, London: Hutchinson.Google Scholar
Scheman, Naomi. 1983. Individualism and the objects of psychology. In Discovering reality. See Harding and Hintikka 1983.Google Scholar
Schopenhauer, Arthur. 1984. Selections from The world as will and representation. In German aesthetic and literary criticism: Kant, Fichte, Schelling, Schopenhauer, Hegel. Simpson, David, ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Spelman, Elizabeth V. 1983. Aristotle and the politicization of the soul. In Discovering reality. See Harding and Hintikka 1983.Google Scholar
Spelman, Elizabeth V. 1988. Inessential woman: Problems of exclusion in feminist thought. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Stephan, Nancy. 1986. Race and gender: The role of analogy in science. Isis 77: 261–77.Google Scholar
Turbayne, Colin M. 1970. The myth of metaphor. Columbia: University of South Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Whitbeck, Caroline. 1976. Theories of sex difference. In Women and philosophy: Toward a theory of liberation. Gould, Carol and Wartofsky, Marx, eds. New York: Putnam.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, Ludwig. 1953. Philosophical investigations. Anscombe, G. E. M., trans. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar