Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T18:26:19.509Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Freedom as Independence: Mary Wollstonecraft and the Grand Blessing of Life

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2020

Alan M. S. J. Coffee
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Independence is a central and recurring theme in Mary Wollstonecraft's work. Independence should not be understood as an individualistic ideal that is in tension with the value of community but as an essential ingredient in successful and flourishing social relationships. I examine three aspects of this rich and complex concept that Wollstonecraft draws on as she develops her own notion of independence as a powerful feminist tool. First, independence is an egalitarian ideal that requires that all individuals, regardless of sex, be protected to a comparable extent in all areas of social, political, and economic life, no matter whether this is in the public or private sphere. Second, so long as this egalitarian condition is not compromised, independence allows for individuals to perform differentiated social roles, including along gendered lines. Finally, the ongoing and collective input of both women and men is required to ensure that the conditions necessary for social independence are maintained. In Wollstonecraft's hands, then, independence is a powerful ideal that allows her to argue that women must be able to act on their own terms as social and political equals, doing so as women whose perspectives and interests may differ from men's.

Type
Cluster on Mary Wollstonecraft
Information
Hypatia , Volume 29 , Issue 4 , Fall 2014 , pp. 908 - 924
Copyright
Copyright © 2014 by Hypatia, Inc.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Earlier versions of this paper were presented at the Symposium on Mary Wollstonecraft and the Enlightenment in Lund (February 2012) and at a meeting of the Society of Women in Philosophy in Dublin (November 2012), as well as at seminars at Birkbeck College London, University College Dublin, and the University of Cape Town. I benefited greatly from the comments and insights offered by the participants at each of those gatherings. I am also very grateful to Sandrine Bergès, Lena Halldenius, and Martina Reuter for their input, and to Iseult Honohan for her close reading of a previous draft. Finally, I would like to thank the editors at Hypatia and the anonymous referees for their critical but invaluable observations.

References

Abbey, Ruth. 1999. Back to the future: Marriage as friendship in the thought of Mary Wollstonecraft. Hypatia 14 (3): 78–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baehr, Amy, ed. 2004. Varieties of feminist liberalism. Lanham, Md.: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Barker‐Benfield, G. 1989. Mary Wollstonecraft: Eighteenth‐century commonwealthwoman. Journal of the History of Ideas 50 (1): 95–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Botting, Eileen Hunt, and Carey, Christine. 2004. Wollstonecraft's philosophical impact on nineteenth‐century American women's rights advocates. American Journal of Political Science 48 (4): 707–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brace, Laura. 2000. “Not empire, but equality”: Mary Wollstonecraft, the marriage state and the sexual contract. Journal of Political Philosophy 8 (4): 433–55.Google Scholar
Coffee, Alan. 2013. Mary Wollstonecraft, freedom and the enduring power of social domination. European Journal of Political Theory 12 (2): 116–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Costa, M. Victoria. 2012. Is neo‐republicanism bad for women? Hypatia 28 (4): 921–936.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dietz, Mary. 2001. Context is all. In Feminism and politics, ed. Phillips, Anne. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ferguson, Moira. 1992. Mary Wollstonecraft and the problematic of slavery. Feminist Review 42: 82–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferguson, Susan. 1999. The radical ideas of Mary Wollstonecraft. Canadian Journal of Political Science 32 (3): 427–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frazer, Elizabeth. 2008. Mary Wollstonecraft on politics and friendship. Political Studies 56 (1): 237–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, Karen. 1997. The passions and the imagination in Wollstonecraft's theory of moral judgment. Utilitas 9 (3): 271–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, Karen. 2012. Liberty and virtue in Catherine Macaulay's enlightenment philosophy. Intellectual History Review 22 (3): 411–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gunther‐Canada, Wendy. 1999. Jean‐Jacques Rousseau and Mary Wollstonecraft on the sexual politics of republican motherhood. Southeastern Political Review 27 (3): 469–90.Google Scholar
Halldenius, Lena. 2007. The primacy of right: On the triad of liberty, equality and virtue in Wollstonecraft's political thought. British Journal for the History of Philosophy 15 (1): 75–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
James, Susan. 2012. Spinoza on philosophy, religion, and politics: The theologico‐political treatise. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laborde, Cécile. 2008. Critical republicanism: The hijab controversy and political philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Landes, Joan. 1988. Women and the public sphere in the age of the French Revolution. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Mackenzie, Catriona. 1993. Reason and sensibility: The ideal of women's self‐governance in the writings of Mary Wollstonecraft. Hypatia 8 (4): 35–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pateman, Carole. 1989. The disorder of women. Cambridge, UK: Polity.Google Scholar
Pateman, Carole. 2007. Why republicanism? Basic Income Studies 2 (2): 1–6.Google Scholar
Pettit, Philip. 1997. Republicanism: A theory of freedom and government. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Phillips, Anne. 2000. Feminism and republicanism: Is this a plausible alliance? Journal of Political Philosophy 8 (2): 279–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Price, Richard. 1992. Political writings. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reuter, Martina. 2007. Catharine Macaulay and Mary Wollstonecraft on the will. In Virtue, liberty and toleration, ed. Broad, J. and Green, K.Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
Sapiro, Virginia. 1992. A vindication of political virtue: The political theory of Mary Wollstonecraft. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Skinner, Quentin. 1998. Liberty before liberalism. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Taylor, Barbara. 2003. Mary Wollstonecraft and the feminist imagination. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Weiss, Penny. 2009. Canon fodder: Historical women political thinkers. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
Wollstonecraft, Mary. 1787. Thoughts on the education of daughters with reflections on female conduct, in the more important duties of life. London: Joseph Johnson.Google Scholar
Wollstonecraft, Mary. 1992. A vindication of the rights of woman. Harmondsworth, UK: Penguin.Google Scholar
Wollstonecraft, Mary. 1995. An historical and moral view of the origin and progress of the French Revolution in The works of Mary Wollstonecraft, volume 6, ed. Todd, Janet and Butler, Marilyn. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wollstonecraft, Mary. 1999. A vindication of the rights of men and a vindication of the rights of woman. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wollstonecraft, Mary. 2005. Maria, or the wrongs of woman. New York: Dover Press.Google Scholar