No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Fragments of Thought: Considering Sophie Germain’s Process Epistemology
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 06 December 2024
Abstract
In this paper I look at the philosophical work of Sophie Germain, a woman mathematician and philosopher in nineteenth-century France. Although forgotten after her death, Germain’s contribution to mathematical sciences has been revisited and reappraised in recent years, but with very few notable exceptions, her philosophical work is still in the margins. In addressing this gap in the literature, I revisit Germain’s contribution to the history of ideas, particularly focusing on her contribution to process epistemologies. I argue that Germain was a truly transdisciplinary thinker avant la lettre and that her philosophical work should be mapped in the wider field of process philosophies. In doing so I make connections between Sophie Germain and Alfred Whitehead’s philosophy of the organism, particularly focusing on their take on feelings, prehensions, happy ideas, and events.
- Type
- Article
- Information
- Copyright
- © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Hypatia, a Nonprofit Corporation
References
Bucciarelli, Luis L., and Dworsky, Nancy. 1980. Sophie Germain: An essay in the history of the theory of elasticity. Dordrecht and Boston, MA: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Comte, Auguste. 1835. Cours de philosophie positive: La philosophie astronomique et la philosophie de la physique, vol. 2, lesson 32. Paris: Bachelier.Google Scholar
Del Centina, Andrea, and Fiocca, Alessandra. 2018. On the correspondence of Sophie Germain. In Mathematical Correspondences and Critical Editions, esd. Borgato, Maria Teresa, Neuenschwander, Erwin, Passeron, Irène. Cham: Birkhäuser.Google Scholar
Frenkel, Edward. 2013. Love and math: The heart of hidden reality. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Germain, Sophie. 1833. Considérations Generales Sur l’Etat Des Sciences Et Des Lettres Aux Différentes Époques de leur Culture. Paris: Lachevardiere.Google Scholar
Germain, Sophie. 1896 [1879]. Œuvres philosophiques de Sophie Germain, suivies de pensées et de lettres inédites. Et précédées d’une notice sur sa vie et ses œuvres par Hte Stupuy. New edn. Paris: Firmin-Didot.Google Scholar
Glesser, Adam, Suceavã, Bogdan D., and Vajiac, Michaela. 2020. The infinite is the chasm in which our thoughts are lost: Reflections on Sophie Germain’s essays. Memoirs of the Scientific Sections of the Romanian Academy 43: 215–23.Google Scholar
Hardy, Godfrey Harold. 2004 [1940]. A mathematician’s apology, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hughes, Christina. 2020. Introduction. In Transdisciplinary feminist research: Innovations in theory, method and practice, ed. Carol, A.Taylor, Hughes, Christina, and Ulmer, Jasmine B.. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Libri, Guglielmo. 1832. Sciences mathématiques—Mlle Germain. Journal des Débats, May 18: 1–2.Google Scholar
Maccioni-Rujo, P. Alessandra, and Mostert, Marco. 1995. The Life and Times of Guglielmo Libri (1802–1869) Scientist, Patriot, Scholar, Journalist and Thief: A Nineteenth-Century Story. Hilversum: Verloren Publishers.Google Scholar
Muller, Jil. 2023. Space and time: Mathematical and moral thoughts in Sophie Germain and Blaise Pascal. In Exploring the contributions of women in the history of philosophy, science, and literature, throughout time, ed. Harry, C. C. and Vlahakis, G. N.. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-39630-4_7
Google Scholar
Musielak, Dora. 2020. Sophie Germain: Revolutionary mathematician. 2nd edn. Cham: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ritti, Paul. 1890. Un discours de M Hippolyte Stupuy sur Sophie Germain. La Revue Occidentale, Philosophique, Sociale et Politique, July 1: 350–57.Google Scholar
Sandford, Stella. 2015. Contradiction of terms: Feminist theory, philosophy and transdisciplinarity. Theory, Culture and Society 32 (5–6): 159–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sarton, George. 1952. Auguste Comte, historian of science: With a short digression on Clotilde de Vaux and Harriet Taylor. Osiris 10: 328–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seibt, Johanna. 2023. Process philosophy. The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Winter 2023 edn), ed. Edward N. Zalta and Uri Nodelman. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2023/entries/process-philosophy
Google Scholar
Shaviro, Steven. 2012. Without Criteria: Kant, Whitehead, Deleuze and Aesthetics. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Smith, Pamela. 2009. Science on the move: Recent trends in the history of early modern science. Renaissance Quarterly 62 (2): 345–75.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stang, Nicholas F. 2023. Kant’s transcendental idealism. The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Winter 2023 edn), ed. Edward N. Zalta and Uri Nodelman. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2023/entries/kant-transcendental-idealism
Google Scholar
Stengers, Isabelle 2008. A constructivist reading of process and reality. Theory, Culture and Society 25 (4): 91–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stupuy, Jean-Léon-Hippolyte. 1896 [1879]. Étude sur la vie et les œuvres de Sophie Germain. In Œuvres philosophiques de Sophie Germain, suivies de pensées et de lettres inédites. Paris: Firmin-Didot.Google Scholar
Watson, James. 2001. The double helix: A personal account of the discovery of the structure of DNA. Guildford: Touchstone.Google Scholar
Whitehead, Alfred North. 1964 [1920]. The concept of nature: The Tarner lectures. delivered in Trinity College. November 1919. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Whitehead, Alfred North. 1967 [1925]. Science and the modern world. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Whitehead, Alfred North. 1985. [1929]. Process and reality. Corrected edn, ed. Griffin, David Ray and Sheburne, Donald W.. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar