Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-2h6rp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-13T09:09:35.715Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Foucault, Rape, and the Construction of the Feminine Body

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 March 2020

Ann J. Cahill
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In 1977, Michel Foucault suggested that legal approaches to rape define it as merely an act of violence, not of sexuality, and therefore not distinct from other types of assaults. I argue that rape can not be considered merely an act of violence because it is instrumental in the construction of the distinctly feminine body. Insofar as the threat of rape is ineluctably, although not determinately, associated with the development of feminine bodily comportment, rape itself holds a host of bodily and sexually specific meanings.

Type
Research Article
Information
Hypatia , Volume 15 , Issue 1 , Winter 2000 , pp. 43 - 63
Copyright
Copyright © 2000 by Hypatia, Inc.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bartky, Sandra. 1988. Foucault, femininity, and the modernization of patriarchal power. In Feminism and Foucault: Reflections on resistance, ed. Diamond, Irene and Quinby, Lee. Boston: Northeastern University Press.Google Scholar
Bell, Vicki.1991. “Beyond the ‘Thorny question’”: Feminism, Foucault and the desexualisation of rape. International Journal of the Sociology of Law 19 (1): 83–100.Google Scholar
Bordo, Susan. 1991. Docile bodies, rebellious bodies: Foucauldian perspectives on female psychopathology. In Writing the politics of difference, ed. Silverman, Hugh J.Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Braidotti, Rosi. 1994. Nomadic subjects: Embodiment and sexual difference in contemporary feminist theory. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Brownmiller, Susan. 1975. Against our will: Men, women, and rape. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
Bunting, Annie.1992. Feminism, Foucault, and law as power/knowledge. Alberta Law Review 30 (3): 829–42.Google Scholar
Butler, Judith. 1987. Variations on sex and gender: Beauvoir, Wittig and Foucault. In Feminism as critique: Essays on the politics of gender, ed. Benhabib, Seyla and Cornell, Drucilla. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Butler, Judith.1989. Foucault and the paradox of bodily inscriptions. Journal of Philosophy 86 (11): 601–607.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Lauretis, Teresa. 1987. Technologiesof gender. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Dumaresq, Delia. 1981. Rape‐sexuality in the law. m/f 5–6: 41–59.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. 1979. Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. 1980. Power/Knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings, 1972–1977 Ed. Gordon, C. Trans. Gordon, Colin. New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. 1988. Confinement, psychiatry, prison. In Politics, philosophy, culture: Interviews and other writings, 1977–1984, ed. Kritzman, L. D., Sheridan, Alan. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. 1990. The history of sexuality, Vol. 1: An introduction. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
Grosz, Elizabeth. 1994. Volatile bodies: Toward a corporeal feminism. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Heberle, Renee.1996. Deconstructive strategies and the movement against sexual violence. Hypatia 11 (4): 63–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hengehold, Laura.1994. An immodest proposal: Foucault, hysterization, and the “second rape.” Hypatia 9 (3): 89–107.Google Scholar
Martin, Biddy. 1988. Feminism, criticism, and Foucault. In Feminism and Foucault: Reflections on resistance, ed. Diamond, Irene and Quinby, Lee. Boston: Northeastern University Press.Google Scholar
McNay, Lois.1991. The Foucauldian body and the exclusion of experience. Hypatia 6 (3): 125–39.Google Scholar
McNay, Lois. 1992. Foucault and feminism. Boston: Northeastern University Press.Google Scholar
McWhorter, Ladelle.1989. Culture or nature? The function of the term “body” in the work of Michel Foucault. Journal of Phibsophy 86 (11): 608–14.Google Scholar
McWhorter, Ladelle. 1990. Foucault's analytics of power. In Crises in continental philosophy, ed. Dallery, A. B. and Scott, C. E.Albany: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
Plaza, Monique.1981. Our damages and their compensation: Rape: The will not to know of Michel Foucault. Feminist Issues 1 (3): 25–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rawlinson, Mary. 1987. Foucault's strategy: Knowledge, power, and the specificity of truth. The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 12: 371–95.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sawicki, Jana. 1991. Disciplining Foucault: Feminism, power, and the body. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Warr, Mark.1984. Fear of victimization: Why are women and the elderly more afraid? Social Science Quarterly 65 (3): 681–702.Google Scholar
Woodhull, Winifred. 1988. Sexuality, power, and the question of rape. In Feminism and Foucault: Reflections on resistance, ed. Diamond, Irene and Quinby, Lee. Boston: Northeastern University Press.Google Scholar
Young, Iris Marion. 1990. Throwing like a girl: A phenomenology of feminine body comportment, motility, and spatiality. In Throwing like a girl and other essays in feminist philosophy and social theory. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar