Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T03:56:29.775Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Foreigners and Inclusion in Academia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2020

Abstract

This article discusses the category of foreigner in the context of academia. In the first part I explore this category and its philosophical significance. A quick look at the literature reveals that this category needs more attention in analyses of dimensions of privilege and disadvantage. Foreignness has peculiarities that demarcate it from other categories of identity, and it intersects with them in complicated ways. Devoting more attention to it would enable addressing issues affecting foreigners in academia that go commonly unnoticed. In the second part of the article I argue that current efforts to make academia a more inclusive environment should address the disadvantages that many foreign academics face. I focus on two senses of foreigner: working and living in a country that is not your country of origin, and being a nonnative speaker of the language in which you work.

Type
Cluster on Foreigners in Philosophy
Copyright
Copyright © 2018 by Hypatia, Inc.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alcoff, Linda M. 2009. Latinos beyond the boundary. Southern Journal of Philosophy 47 (1): 112–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alexander, Jacqui M., and Mohanty, Chandra T. 1997. Genealogies, legacies, movements. In Feminist genealogies, colonial legacies, democratic futures, ed. Alexander, Jacqui and Mohanty, Chandra. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Ayala, Saray. 2015. Philosophy and the non‐native speaker condition. American Philosophical Association Newsletter 14 (2): 29.Google Scholar
Ayala, Saray. 2017. Outing foreigners: Accent and national origin in conversations. Joint Session of the Mind Association and Aristotelian Society, as part of a SWIP UK panel. University of Edinburgh, July 14–16.Google Scholar
Blankmeyer Burke, Teresa. 2016. Time, speedviewing, and deaf academics. Possibilities and finger snaps blog, March 20. https://possibilitiesandfingersnaps.wordpress.com/2016/03/20/time-speedviewing-and-deaf-academics/ (accessed June 29, 2017).Google Scholar
Boring, Anne, Ottoboni, Kellie, and Stark, Philip. 2016. Student evaluations of teaching (mostly) do not measure teaching effectiveness. Science Open Research https://www.scienceopen.com/document?vid=818d8ec0-5908-47d8-86b4-5dc38f04b23e (accessed June 29, 2017).Google Scholar
Bradac, James J. 1990. Language attitudes and impression formation. In Handbook of language and social psychology, ed. Giles, H. and Robinson, W. P.London: John Wiley.Google Scholar
Boyd, Sally. 2003. Foreign‐born teachers in the multilingual classroom in Sweden: The role of attitudes to foreign accent. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism 6 (3–4): 283–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crenshaw, Kimberlé. 1991. Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. Stanford Law Review 43 (6): 1241–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chowdhury, Elora H. 2009. Locating global feminism elsewhere: Braiding US women of color and transnational feminisms. Cultural Dynamics 21 (1): 5178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Contessa, Gabriele. 2014. Analytic philosophy and the English language: Some data and some preliminary thoughts. Yet another philosopher's blog?!?, September 29. http://yetanotherphilosophersblog.blogspot.com/2014/09/analytic-philosophy-and-english.html (accessed June 29, 2017).Google Scholar
Erlenbusch, Verena. 2017. Being a foreigner in philosophy: A taxonomy. Hypatia, this issue.Google Scholar
Giles, Howard. 1973. Communication effectiveness as a function of accented speech. Speech Monographs 40 (4): 330–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fuertes, Jairo N., Gottdiener, William H., Martin, Helena, Gilbert, Tracey C., and Giles, Howard. 2012. A Meta‐analysis of the effects of speakers’ accent on interpersonal evaluations. European Journal of Social Psychology 42: 120133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hutchison, Charles B. 2015. Experiences of immigrant professors: Challenges, cross‐cultural differences, and lessons for success. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
John, Mary E. 1989. Postcolonial feminists in the Western intellectual field: Anthropologists and Native Informants. Inscriptions 5: 4973.Google Scholar
Leiter, Brian. 2013. A cautionary tale for those needing a green card to work in the U.S. Leiter reports: A philosophy blog, September 24. http://leiterreports.typepad.com/blog/2013/09/a-cautionary-tale-for-those-needing-a-green-card-to-work-in-the-us.html (accessed June 29, 2017).Google Scholar
Lindemann, Stephanie. 2002. Listening with an attitude: A model of native‐speaker comprehension of nonnative speakers in the United States. Language in Society 31 (3): 419–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lippi‐Green, Rosina. 1997. English with an accent: Language, ideology, and discrimination in the United States. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Lombrozo, Tania, and Gruber, June. 2016. Welcoming remarks. Misconceptions of the mind conference, April 3. http://momicon.org/ (accessed June 29, 2017).Google Scholar
Manrique, C., and Manrique, G. 1999. The multicultural or immigrant faculty in American society. Lewiston, N.Y.: Edwin Mellen Press.Google Scholar
Mizrahi, Moti. 2013. Non‐native English speakers in philosophy. The philosophers’ cocoon, January 4. http://philosopherscocoon.typepad.com/blog/2013/01/non-native-english-speakers-in-philosophy.html (accessed June 29, 2017).Google Scholar
Mohanty, Chandra T. 1986. Under Western eyes: Feminist scholarship and colonial discourses. Boundary 2 12 (3): 333–58.Google Scholar
Mohanty, Chandra T. 2003. Feminism without borders. Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oberman, Kieran. 2016. Refugees & economic migrants: A morally spurious distinction. The Critique, January 6. http://www.thecritique.com/articles/refugees-economic-migrants-a-morally-spurious-distinction-2/ (accessed June 29, 2017).Google Scholar
Rubin, Donald L. 1992. Nonlanguage factors affecting undergraduates’ judgments of non‐native English‐speaking teaching assistants. Research in Higher Education 33 (4): 511–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skachkova, Penska. 2007. Academic careers of immigrant women professors in the US. Higher Education 53 (6): 697738.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stein, Edward. 2011. Sexual orientations, rights, and the body: Immutability, essentialism, and nativism. Social Research 78 (2): 633–58.Google Scholar
Sundstrom, Ronald R. 2013. Sheltering xenophobia. Critical Philosophy of Race 1 (1): 6885.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Terrone, Enrico, and Contesi, Filippo. 2016. Composition or proposition? Paper presented at the Foreigners in Philosophy Workshop. University of California, Berkeley, March 29.Google Scholar
Wilcox, Shelley. 2005. American neo‐nativism and gendered immigrant exclusions. In Feminist interventions in ethics and politics, ed. Andrew, Barbara, Keller, Jean, and Schwartzman, Lisa. Lanham, Md.: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar