Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T05:08:04.533Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Feminist-Pragmatist Revisionings of Reason, Knowledge, and Philosophy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 March 2020

Phyllis Rooney
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

By tracing a specific development through the approaches of Peirce, James, and Dewey I present a view of (classical) pragmatist epistemology that invites comparison with recent work in feminist epistemology. Important dimensions of pragmatism and feminism emerge from this critical dialectical relationship between them. Pragmatist reflections on the role of reason and philosophy in a changing world encourage us to see that philosophy's most creative and most responsible future must also be a feminist one.

Type
Research Article
Information
Hypatia , Volume 8 , Issue 2: Special Issue: Feminism and Pragmatism , Spring 1993 , pp. 15 - 37
Copyright
Copyright © 1993 by Hypatia, Inc.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Baier, Annette. 1985. Cartesian persons. In Postures of the mind: Essays on mind and morals. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Bleier, Ruth. 1984. Science and gender: A critique of biology and its theories on women. New York: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
Bordo, Susan. 1986. The Cartesian masculinization of thought. Signs 11(3): 247–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bordo, Susan. 1987. The flight to objectivity. Albany: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
Code, Lorraine. 1991. What can she know? Feminist theory and the construction of knowledge. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Dewey, John. 1929. The quest for certainty: A study of the relation of knowledge and action. New York: Minton, Balch and Co.Google Scholar
Dewey, John. 1931. Philosophy and civilization. New York: Minton, Balch, and Co.Google Scholar
Dewey, John. 1938. Logic: The theory of inquiry. New York: Henry Holt and Co.Google Scholar
Dewey, John. 1948. Reconstruction in philosophy. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Dewey, John. 1958. Experience and nature. New York: Dover.Google Scholar
Duran, Jane. 1991. Toward a feminist epistemology. Savage, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Fausto‐Sterling, Anne. 1985. Myths of gender. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Fraser, Nancy. 1989. Unruly practices: Power, discourse and gender in contemporary social theory. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Frege, Gottlob [1879] 1962. Begriffsschrift, a formula language, modeled upon that of arithmetic, for pure thought. In From Frege to Godel: A source book in mathematical logic, 1879–1931, ed. van Heijenoort, Jean. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Harding, Sandra. 1991. Whose science? Whose knowledge?: Thinking from women's lives. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Heldke, Lisa. 1987. John Dewey and Evelyn Fox Keller: A shared epistemological tradition. Hypatia 2(3): 129–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hubbard, Ruth. 1990. The politics of women's biology. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
James, William. 1950. The principles of psychology. 2 volumes. New York: Dover Publications.Google Scholar
James, William. 1977. A pluralistic universe. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
James, William. 1979. The will to believe. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
James, William. 1981. Pragmatism. Indianapolis: Hackett.Google Scholar
Keller, Evelyn Fox. 1985. Reflections on gender and science. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Kittay, Eva Feder, and Meyers, Diana T., eds. 1987. Women and moral theory. Totowa, NJ: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Lloyd, Genevieve. 1984. The man of reason: “Male” and “female” in Western philosophy. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Longino, Helen. 1990. Science as social knowledge. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Longino, Helen. 1992. Essential tensions—phase two: Feminist, philosophical, and social studies of science. In The social dimensions of science, ed. McMullin, Ernan. University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
Misak, C. J. 1991. Truth and the end of inquiry: A Peircean account of truth. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Nelson, Lynn Hankinson. 1990. Who knows: From Quine to a feminist empiricism. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
Peirce, Charles Sanders [1877] 1982. The fixation of belief. In Pragmatism: The classic writings. See Thayer 1982.Google Scholar
Peirce, Charles Sanders [1878] 1982. How to make our ideas clear. In Pragmatism: The classic writings. See Thayer 1982.Google Scholar
Rooney, Phyllis. 1991a. A different different voice: On the feminist challenge in moral theory. Philosophical Forum 22(4): 335–61.Google Scholar
Rooney, Phyllis. 1991b. Gendered reason: Sex metaphor and conceptions of reason. Hypatia 6(2): 77–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rooney, Phyllis. 1992. On values in science: Is the epistemic/non‐epistemic distinction useful?PSA 1992, Volume 1:13–22. Ed. Hull, David, Forbes, Micky, and Okruhlik, Kathleen. East Lansing, MI: Philosophy of Science Association.Google Scholar
Rouse, Joseph. 1987. Knowledge and power: Toward a political philosophy of science. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Seigfried, Charlene Haddock. 1990. William James's radical reconstruction of philosophy. Albany: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
Spelman, Elizabeth V. 1988. Inessential woman: Problems of exclusion in feminist thought. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Spelman, Elizabeth V. 1989. Anger and insubordination. In Women, knowledge, and reality: Explorations in feminist philosophy, ed. Garry, Ann and Pearsall, Marilyn. Boston: Unwin Hyman.Google Scholar
Thayer, H. S. 1968. Meaning and action: A critical history of pragmatism. Indianapolis: Hackett.Google Scholar
Thayer, H. S. ed. 1982. Pragmatism: The classic writings. Indianapolis: Hackett.Google Scholar
Walker, Margaret Urban. 1989. Moral understandings: Alternative “epistemology” for a feminist ethics. Hypatia 4(2): 15–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, Morton. 1972. Science and sentiment in America: Philosophical thought from Jonathan Edwards to John Dewey. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wilson, Daniel J. 1990. Science, community, and the transformation of American philosophy, 1860–1930. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar