Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T15:04:01.954Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Feminism, Postmodernism, and Psychological Research

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 March 2020

Abstract

Drawing primarily from the work of Julia Kristeva and Judith Butler, the author suggests that a postmodern approach to identity can be used to challenge the essentialism that pervades both feminist empiricism and standpoint theory, and thus move feminist psychology in a more emancipatory direction. A major premise of this paper is that an engagement with postmodernism redirects our attention to symbolic constructions of femininity and to the sociopolitical grounding of experience.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © 2003 by Hypatia, Inc.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alcoff, Linda. 1997. The politics of postmodern feminism, revisited. Cultural Critique 36(Spring): 527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alcoff, Linda, and Potter, Elizabeth, eds. 1993. Feminist epistemologies. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Arbetter, Sandra. 1991. Boys and girls: Equal but not the same. Current Health 18(4): 16.Google Scholar
Bartky, Sandra. 1991. Feminism and domination: Studies in the phenomenology of oppression. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Belenky, Mary, Clinchy, Blythe, and Goldberger, Nancy. 1986. Women's ways of knowing: The development of self, voice, and mind. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Bern, Sandra. 1995. Dismantling gender polarization and compulsory heterosexuality: Should we turn the volume down or up? The Journal of Sex Research 32(4): 329–34.Google Scholar
Berg, Maggie. 1991. Luce Irigaray's “Contradictions”: Poststructuralism and feminism. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 17(1): 5070.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Billing, Michael. 1994. Repopulating the depopulated pages of social psychology. Theory and Psychology 4(3): 307–35.Google Scholar
Bleier, Ruth. 1986. “Introduction.” In Feminist approaches to science, ed. Bleier, Ruth. New York: Pergamon.Google Scholar
Bohan, Janis. 1993. Regarding gender: Essentialism, constructionism and feminist psychology. Psychology of Women Quarterly 17(1): 521.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bohan, Janis. 2002. Sex differences and/in the self: Classic themes, feminist variations, postmodern challenges. Psychology of Women Quarterly 26(1): 7488.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bordo, Susan. 1993. Unbearable weight: Feminism, western culture, and the body. Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Brown, Lyn Mikel, and Gilligan, Carol, 1992. Meeting at the crossroads: Women's psychology and girls’ development. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burman, Erica. 1998. Deconstructing feminist psychology. Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage Publications.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burman, Erica, and Parker, Ian, eds. 1993. Discourse analytic research: Repertoires and readings of texts in action. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Burr, Viven. 1995. An introduction to social constructionism. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butler, Judith. 1990a. Gender trouble: Feminism, and the subversion of identity. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Butler, Judith. 1990b. Performative acts and gender constitution: An essay in phenomenology and feminist theory. In Performing feminisms: Feminist critical theory and theatre, ed. Case, Sue‐Ellen. Baltimore, Md.: John Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Butler, Judith. 1992. Contingent foundations. Feminism and the question of ‘Postmodernism.’ In Feminists theorize the political, ed. Butler, Judith and Scott, Joan W.New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Butler, Judith. 1993. Bodies that matter: On the discursive limits of “sex.” New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Butler, Judith. 1995. For a careful reading. In Feminist contentions: A philosophical exchange, ed. Benhabib, Seyla, Butler, Judith, Cornell, Drucilla, and Fraser, Nancy. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Butler, Judith. 1998. How bodies come to matter: An interview with Judith Butler, ed. Irene Costera Meijer and Baukje Prins. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 23(2): 275–86.Google Scholar
Caplan, Paula, and Caplan, Jeremy. 1994. Thinking critically about research on sex and gender. New York: Harper Collins.Google Scholar
Code, Lorraine. 1998. Epistemology. In A companion to feminist philosophy, ed. Jaggar, Alison and Young, Iris. London: Blackwell Publishers.Google Scholar
Connolly, Deborah. 2000. Homeless mothers: Face to face with women and poverty. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Cosgrove, Lisa. 2000. Crying out loud: Understanding women's emotional distress as both lived experience and social construction. Feminism & Psychology 10(2): 247–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cosgrove, Lisa. 2002. Resisting essentialism in feminist therapy theory: Some epistemological considerations. Women & Therapy 25(1): 89112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cosgrove, Lisa, and McHugh, Maureen. 2000. Speaking for ourselves: Feminist methods and community psychology. American Journal of Community Psychology 28(6): 815–38.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cosgrove, Lisa, and McHugh, Maureen. 2002. Deconstructing difference: Conceptualizing feminist research from within the postmodern. In Charting a new course for feminist psychology, ed. Collins, Lynn, Dunlap, Michelle, and Chrisler, Joan. Westport: Praeger.Google Scholar
Crewe, Jonathan. 1997. Transcoding the world: Haraway's postmodernism. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 22(4): 891905.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, Kathy. 1994. What's in a voice? Methods and metaphors. Feminism & Psychology 4(10): 353–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Derrida, Jacques. 1982. Margins of philosophy. Trans. Bass, Alan. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Eagly, Alice. 1994. On comparing men and women. Feminism & Psychology 4(4): 501506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eagly, Alice. 1995. The science and politics of comparing men and women. American Psychologist 50(3): 145–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farganis, Sondra. 1992. Feminism and the reconstruction of social science. In Gender/body /knowledge: Feminist reconstructions of being and knowing, ed. Jaggar, Alison and Bordo, Susan. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
Fausto‐Sterling, Anne. 1992. Myths of gender: Biological theories about men and women. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Fausto‐Sterling, Anne. 2000. Sexing the body: gender politics & the construction of sexuality. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Ferguson, Kathy E. 1991. Interpretation and genealogy in feminism. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 16(2): 322–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fine, Michelle. 1992. Disruptive voices: The possibilities of feminist research. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flyvbjerg, Brent. 2001. Making social science matter. Trans. Sampson, Steven. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foster, Thomas. 1988. History, critical theory, and women's social practices: “Women's time” and housekeeping. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 14(1): 7399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foucault, Michel. 1979. Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison. Trans. Sheridan, Alan. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. 1980a. Power/knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings, ed. Gordon, Colin. New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. 1980b. The history of sexuality: Volume 1: An introduction. Trans. Hurley, Robert. New York: Vintage.Google Scholar
Fox Keller, Evelyn. 1982. Feminism and science. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 7(3), 589602.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gelfond, Margaret. 1991. Reconceptualizing agoraphobia: A case study of epistemological bias in clinical research. Feminism & Psychology 1(2): 247–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gergen, Kenneth. 1994. Realities and relationships: Soundings in social construction. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Gergen, Kenneth. 2001. Psychological science in a postmodern world. American Psychologist 56(10): 803–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gergen, Mary. 1988. Toward a feminist metatheory and methodology in the social sciences. In Feminist thought and the structure of knowledge, ed. Gergen, Mary. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Gilligan, Carol. 1993. In a different voice: Psychological theory and women's development. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Goldner, Virginia. 1991. Toward a critical relational theory of gender. Psychoanalytic Dialogues 1(3): 249–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grosz, Elizabeth. 1994. Volatile bodies: Toward a corporeal feminism. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Hafner, Julian. 1982. The marital context of the agoraphobic syndrome. In Agoraphobia: Multiple perspectives on theory and treatment, ed. Chambless, Diane and Goldstein, Alan J.New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Halpren, Diane. 1994. Stereotypes, science, censorship, and the study of sex differences. Feminism and Psychology 4(4): 523–30.Google Scholar
Harding, Sandra. 1991. Whose science? Whose knowledge? Thinking from women's lives. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Hare‐Mustin, Rachel T, and Marecek, Jeanne. 1994a. Asking the right questions: Feminist psychology and sex differences. Feminism and Psychology 4(4): 531–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hare‐Mustin, Rachel T, and Marecek, Jeanne. 1994b. Feminism and postmodernism: Dilemmas and points of resistance. Dulwich Centre Newsletter 4: 1319.Google Scholar
Hekman, Susan. 1991. Reconstituting the subject; Feminism, modernism, and postmodernism. Hypatia 6(2): 4561.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hekman, Susan. 1999. The future of differences: Truth and method in feminist theory. Maiden, Mass.: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Henriques, Julian, Hollway, Wendy, Urwin, Cathy, Venn, Couze, and Walkerdine, Valerie, eds. 1998. Changing the subject. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
Hepburn, Alexa. 1999a. Derrida and psychology: Deconstruction and its ab/uses in critical discursive psychologies. Theory & Psychology 9(5): 639–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hepburn, Alexa. 1999b. Postmodernity and the politics of feminist psychology. Radical Psychology 1(2): 120.Google Scholar
Hepburn, Alexa. 2000. On the alleged incompatibility between relativism and feminist psychology. Feminism & Psychology 10(1): 91106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herbold, Sarah. 1995. Well‐placed reflections: (Post)modern woman as symptom of (post)modern man. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 21(1): 83115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hollway, Wendy. 1989. Subjectivity and method in psychology: Gender meaning and science. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Hooks, Bell. 1984. Yearning: Race, gender, and cultural politics. Boston: South End Press.Google Scholar
Hyde, Janet Shelby. 1994. Should psychologists study gender differences? Yes, with some guidelines. Feminism & Psychology 4(4): 507–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Irigaray, Luce. 1985. The sex which is not one. Trans, by Catherine Porter and Carolyn Burke. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Jack, Dana. 1991. Silencing the self: Depression and women. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Jardine, Alice. 1981. Introduction to Julia Kristeva's “Women's time.” Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 7(1): 512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kimball, Meredith 1995. Feminist visions of gender similarities and differences. New York: Harrington Park Press.Google Scholar
Kimball, Meredith 2001. Gender similarities and differences as feminist contradictions. In Handbook of the psychology of women and gender, ed. Unger, Rhoda. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Kristeva, Julia. 1980. Desire in language: A semiotic approach to literature and art. Trans, by Thomas Goray, Alice Jardine, and Leon S. Roudiez New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Kristeva, Julia. 1981a. Woman can never be defined. In New French Feminisms, ed. Marks, Elaine and De Courtivron, Isabelle. New York: Schocken Books.Google Scholar
Kristeva, Julia. 1981b. Women's time. Trans. Alice Jardine and Harry Blake. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 7(1): 1335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kristeva, Julia. 1982. Powers of horror: An essay on abjection. Trans. Roudiez, Leon S.New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Kristeva, Julia. 1984. “Julia Kristeva in conversation with Rosalind Coward.” In Desire, ed. Appignanesi, Lisa. London: ICA Documents: 23.Quoted in Allison Weir, Sacrificial logics: Feminist theory and the critique of identity. (New York: Routledge, 1996), 182.Google Scholar
Kristeva, Julia. 1986. The Kristeva reader, ed. Moi, Toril. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Lacan, Jacques. 1977. Ecrits: A selection. Trans. Sheridan, Alan. New York: W.W. Norton & Company.Google Scholar
Landrine, Hope. 1996. Bringing cultural diversity to feminist psychology: Theory, research and practice. Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
Lamer, Glenn. 1999. Derrida and the deconstruction of power as context and topic in therapy. In Deconstructing psychotherapy, ed. Parker, Ian. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
Lather, Patti. 1991. Getting smart: Feminist research and pedagogy within the postmodern. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lay ton, Lynne. 1998. Who's that girl? Who's that boy? Clinical practice meets postmodern gender theory. Northvale, N, J.: Jason Aronson.Google Scholar
Lorber, Judith. 1994. Paradoxes of gender. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Lott, Bernice, and Maluso, Diane. 1993. The social learning of gender. In The psychology of gender, ed. Beall, Anne and Sternberg, Robert. New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
Lykes, Brinton. 1994. Whose meeting at which crossroads? A response to Brown and Gilligan. Feminism & Psychology 4(3): 345–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malone, Kareen. 2001. Beyond constructionism and essentialism: The stakes of gender as a deadlock within subjectivity. Paper presented 27 August to the American Psychological Association, San Francisco.Google Scholar
McHugh, Maureen. 1996. A feminist approach to agoraphobia: Challenging traditional views of women at home. In Lectures on the psychology of women, ed. Chrisler, Joan, Golden, Carla, and Rozee, Patricia. Boston: The McGraw‐Hill Co., Inc.Google Scholar
Miller, Jean Baker, and Stiver, Irene. 1997. The healing connection: How women form relationships in therapy and in life. Boston: Beacon.Google Scholar
Moi, Toril. 1985. Sexual/textual politics: Feminist literary theory. New York: Methuen.Google Scholar
Miller, Jean Baker, and Stiver, Irene. 1987. French Feminist Thought. New York: Basil Blackwell, Inc.Google Scholar
Nelson, Lynn Hankinson. 1990. Who knows: From Quine to a feminist empiricism. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
Nelson, Lynn Hankinson. 1993. A question of evidence. Hypatia 8(2): 174–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nye, Andrea. 1987. Woman clothed with the sun: Julia Kristeva and the escape from/to language. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 12(4): 664–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poovey, Mary. 1992. Feminism and postmodernism—another view. Boundary 219(2): 3452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Potter, Jonathan, and Wetherell, Margaret. 1996. Discourse and psychology: Beyond attitudes and behavior. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Pujal, I Llombart Margot. 1998. Feminist psychology or the history of a nonfeminist practice. In Deconstructing Feminist Psychology, ed. Burman, Erica. Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Priority Home: Federal plan to break the cycle of homelessness. 1993. Washington, D.C.: Executive Order 12848. 19 May 1993.Google Scholar
Rose, Hilary. 1986. Beyond masculinst realities: A feminist epistemology for the sciences. In Feminist approaches to science, ed. Bleier, Ruth. New York: Pergamon.Google Scholar
Scott, Joan W. 1992. Experience. In Feminists theorize the political, ed. Butler, Judith and Scott, Joan. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Shrage, Laurie. 1994. Moral dilemmas of feminism: Prostitution, adultery, and abortion. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Simons, Jon. 1996. Foucault's mother. In Feminist interpretations of Michel Foucault, ed. Hekman, Susan. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
Singer, Linda. 1992. Feminism and postmodernism. In feminists theorize the political, ed. Butler, Judith and Scott, Joan W.New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Sommers, Christina, 2000. Guys and dotls: Differences in behavior of boys and girls is normal. Men's Health 15(5): 134.Google Scholar
Spretnak, Charlene. 1996. The disembodied worldview of deconstructive post‐modernism. In Radically speaking: Feminism reclaimed, ed. Bell, Diane and Klein, Renate. North Melbourne, Australia: Spinifex Press.Google Scholar
Tavris, Carol. 1993. The mismeasure of woman. New York: Simon & Schuster.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tuana, Nancy, 1992. The radical future of feminist empiricism. Hypatia 7(1): 100–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Urwin, Cathy. 1998. Power relations and the emergence of language. In Changing the subject, ed. Henriques, Julian, Hollway, Wendy, Urwin, Cathy, Venn, Couze, and Walkerdine, Valerie. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
Ussher, Jane. 1999. Eclecticism and methodological pluralism: The way forward for feminist research. Psychology of Women Quarterly 23(1): 4146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walkerdine, Valerie. 1989. The mastery of reason: Cognitive development & the production of rationality. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Webster, Fiona. 2000. The politics of sex and gender: Benhabib and Butler debate subjectivity. Hypatia 15(1): 122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weir, Allison. 1996. Sacrificial logics: Feminist theory and the critique of identity. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Wilkinson, Sue, and Kitzinger, Celia, eds. 1995. Feminism and discourse: Psychological perspectives. Thousand Oaks, Calif: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Wylie, Alison, Okrulik, Kathleen, Thielen‐Wilson, Leslie, and Morton, Sandra. 1989. Feminist critique of science: The epistemological and methodological literature. Women's Studies International Forum 12(3): 379–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Young, Iris Marion. 1997. Intersecting voices: Dilemmas of gender, political philosophy, and policy. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Zerilli, Linda. 1992. A process without a subject: Simone de Beauvoir and Julia Kristeva on maternity. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 18(1): 111–33.Google Scholar