Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T06:29:03.457Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Feminism and Ecology: On the Domination of Nature

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 March 2020

Patricia Jagentowicz Mills
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper examines the attempt to bring together feminist and ecological concerns in the work of Isaac Balbus and Ynestra King, two thinkers who place the problem of the domination of nature at the center of contemporary liberation struggles. Through a consideration of the abortion issue (which foregrounds the relation between nature and history, and the problem of their “reconciliation”) I argue against what I call their abstract pro-nature stance.

Type
Research Article
Information
Hypatia , Volume 6 , Issue 1: Special Issue: Ecological Feminism , Spring 1991 , pp. 162 - 178
Copyright
Copyright © 1991 by Hypatia, Inc.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adorno, Theodor W. 1973. Negative dialectics. Ashton, E. B., trans. New York: Seabury Press.Google Scholar
Adorno, Theodor W. 1974. Minima moralia: Reflections from damaged life. Jephcott, E. F. N., trans. London: New Left Books.Google Scholar
Balbus, Isaac. 1982. Marxism and domination: A neo‐Hegelian, feminist, psychoanalytic theory of sexual, political, and technological liberation. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Bookchin, Murray. 1982. The ecology of freedom. Palo Alto: Cheshire Books.Google Scholar
Butler, Judith. 1985. Response to “Women: The one and the many” by Elizabeth V. Spelman. Paper presented to the American Philosophical Association.Google Scholar
Echols, Alice. 1989. Daring to be bad: Radical feminism in America 1967‐‐1975. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Hartsock, Nancy. 1983. Money, sex and power. Boston: Northeastern University Press.Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. 1979. Hegel's phenomenology of spirit. Miller, A. V., trans. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hentoff, Nat. 1985. How can the left be against life? Village Voice. July 16: 18, 20.Google Scholar
Horkheimer, Max. 1974. Eclipse of reason. New York: Seabury Press.Google Scholar
Horkheimer, Max, and Adorno., T. W. 1972. Dialectic of enlightenment. New York: Herder and Herder.Google Scholar
Jaggar, Alison M. 1983. Feminist politics and human nature. Totowa, N.J.: Rowman and Allanheld.Google Scholar
King, Ynestra. 1983. The ecology of feminism and the feminism of ecology. Harbinger: The Journal of Social Ecology 1(2): 16–22.Google Scholar
King, Ynestra. 1989. Healing the wounds: Feminism, ecology, and nature/culture dualism. In Gender/body/knowledge. Jaggar, Alison M. and Bordo, Susan, eds. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
Mills, Patricia J. 1987. Woman, nature, and psyche. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Morgan, Kathryn Pauly. 1982. Androgyny: A conceptual analysis. Social Theory and Practice 8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pollitt, Katha. 1985. Hentoff, are you listening? Mother Jones. February/March.Google Scholar
Rich, Adrienne. 1979. Of woman born. New York: W.W. Norton.Google Scholar
Willis, Ellen. 1984. Radical feminism and feminist radicalism. In The ′60s without apology. Sayres, S.et al., eds. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Willis, Ellen. 1985. Putting women back into the abortion debate. Village Voice. July 16: 15–16, 24.Google Scholar