Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T21:12:45.492Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Ethics of Caring and the Institutional Ethics Committee

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 March 2020

Betty A. Sichel
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Institutional ethics committees (lECs) in health care facilities now create moral policy, provide moral education, and consult with physicians and other health care workers. After sketching reasons for the development of IECs, this paper first examines the predominant moral standards it is often assumed lECs are now using, these standards being neo-Kantian principles of justice and utilitarian principles of the greatest good. Then, it is argued that a feminine ethics of care, as posited by Carol Gilligan and Nel Noddings, is an unacknowledged basis for /EC discussions and decisions. Further, it is suggested that feminine ethics of care can and should provide underlying theoretical tools and standards for lECs.

Type
Research Article
Information
Hypatia , Volume 4 , Issue 2: Special Issue: Feminist Ethics and Medicine , Summer 1989 , pp. 45 - 56
Copyright
Copyright © 1989 by Hypatia, Inc.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Dugan, Daniel O. 1987. Masculine and feminine voices: Making ethical decisions in the care of the dying. The Journal of Medical Humanities and Bioethics 8: 129–140.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fost, Norman and Cranford, Ronald E. 1985. Hospital ethics committees. JAMA 253: 2698.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gilligan, Carol. 1982. In a different voice. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Glantz, Leonard H. 1984. Contrasting institutional review boards with institutional ethics committees. In Institutional ethics committees and health care decision making. Cranford, Ronald E. and Edward Doudera, A. eds., Ann Arbor. Mich.: Health Administration Press.Google Scholar
Hampshire, Stuart. 1983. Morality and conflict. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Kuhse, Helga and Singer, Peter. 1985. Should the baby live? Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lyons, Nona Plessner. 1983. Two perspectives on self, relationship, and morality. Harvard Educational Review 53: 125–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Macklin, Ruth. 1987. Mortal choices New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
Macklin, Ruth and Kupfer, Robin B. 1988. Hospital ethks committees: Manual for a training program. New York: Albert Einstein College of Medicine.Google Scholar
Noddings, Nel. 1984. Caring, a feminine approach to ethics and moral education. Berkeley, Calif.: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, Martha Craven. 1983. Flawed crystals: James's The Golden Bowl and literature as moral philosophy. New Literary History 15: 25–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paget, Marianne A. 1988. The unity of mistakes. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
Rachels, James. 1986. The end of life. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Rawls, John. 1971. A theory of justice. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Rawls, John. 1955. Two concepts of rules. Philosophical Review 64: 3–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosner, Fred. 1985. Hospital medical ethics committees: A review of their development. JAMA 253: 2693.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sichel, Betty A. 1985. Women's moral development in search of philosophical assumptions. The Joumal of Moral Education 14: 149–161.10.1080/0305724850140301CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weir, Robert F., ed. 1977. Ethical issues in death and dying. New York: Columbia University Press.10.7312/weir91040CrossRefGoogle Scholar