Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T22:59:23.139Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Epistemology of the Question of Authenticity, in Place of Strategic Essentialism

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 March 2020

Emily S. Lee
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The question of authenticity centers in the lives of women of color to invite and restrict their representative roles. For this reason, Gayatri Chakravorty Spivak and Uma Narayan advocate responding with strategic essentialism. This paper argues against such a strategy and proposes an epistemic understanding of the question of authenticity. The question stems from a kernel of truth—the connection between experience and knowledge. But a coherence theory of knowledge better captures the sociality and the holism of experience and knowledge.

Type
Epistemic Justice, Ignorance, and Procedural Objectivity
Information
Hypatia , Volume 26 , Issue 2 , Spring 2011 , pp. 258 - 279
Copyright
Copyright © 2011 by Hypatia, Inc.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adorno, Theodor. 1964. The jargon of authenticity. Trans. Knut Tarnowski and Frederic Will. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Alcoff, Linda Martín. 1991–1992. The problem of speaking for others. Cultural Critique 20: 5–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alcoff, Linda Martín. 1998. Real knowing: A response to my critics. Social Epistemology 12 (3): 289–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alcoff, Linda Martín. 2000a. Merleau‐Ponty and feminist theory on experience. In Chiasms: Merleau‐Ponty's notion of flesh, ed. Evans, Fred and Lawlor, Leonard. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Alcoff, Linda Martín. 2000b. Who's afraid of identity politics? In Reclaiming identity: realist theory and the predicament of postmodernism, ed. Moya, Paula and Hames‐Garcia, Michael. Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Alcoff, Linda Martín. 2006. Visible identities: race, gender, and the self. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bonjour, Laurence. 1985. The structure of empirical knowledge. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Dancy, Jonathan. 1985. Introduction to contemporary epistemology. Cambridge, Mass.: Blackwell Publishers, Inc.Google Scholar
Dingwaney, Anuradha, and Needham, Lawrence. 1996. The difference that difference makes. Socialist Review 26 (3&4): 5–48.Google Scholar
Fanon, Frantz. 1967. Black skin, white masks. Trans. Charles Lam Markmann. New York: Grove Press.Google Scholar
Grosz, Elizabeth. 1985. Criticism, feminism and the institution. An interview with Gayatri Chakravorty Spivak. Thesis Eleven 10/11: 175–89.Google Scholar
Harding, Sandra. 1991. Whose science? whose knowledge?: thinking from women's lives. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Mohanty, Chandra. 1984. Under western eyes: Feminist scholarship and colonial discourses. Boundary 2 12 (3): 333–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mohanty, Satya. 1997. Literary theory and the claims of history: postmodernism, objectivity, multicultural politics. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Monahan, Michael. 2005. The conservation of authenticity: Political commitment and racial reality. Philosophia Africana 18 (1): 37–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moya, Paula M.L. 1997. Postmodernism, ‘realism,’ and the politics of identity: Cherríe Moraga and Chicana feminism. In Feminist genealogies, colonial legacies, democratic futures, ed. Alexander, Jacqui and Mohanty, Chandra Talpade. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Narayan, Uma. 1997. Dislocating cultures: identities, traditions, and third‐world feminism. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Nelson, Lynn Hankinson. 1990. Who knows: from Quine to a feminist empiricism. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
Quine, W.V.O. 1953. From a logical point of view. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Scott, Joan W. 1991. The evidence of experience. Critical Inquiry 17 (4): 773–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sherman, Edward. 2005. Authenticity and diversity: A comparative reading of Charles Taylor and Martin Heidegger. Dialogue 44 (1): 145–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spivak, Gayatri Chakravorty. 1988. Can the subaltern speak? In Marxism and the interpretation of culture, ed. Nelson, Cary and Greenberg, Lawrence. Chicago: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Spivak, Gayatri Chakravorty. 1989. In a word: Interview. Differences 1 (2): 124–56.Google Scholar
Stone‐Mediatore, Shari. 2000. Chandra Mohanty and the re‐valuing of “experience.” In Decentering the center: philosophy for a multicultural postcolonial and feminist world, ed. Narayan, Uma and Harding, Sandra. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Walzer, Michael. 1995. Preface. In Anti‐semite and jew, ed. Sartre, Jean‐Paul. New York: Schocken Books.Google Scholar
Williams, Patricia J. 1991. The alchemy of race and rights. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar