Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T04:04:48.314Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Embodiment, Sexual Difference, and the Nomadic Subject

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 March 2020

Rosi Braidotti
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article deals with sexual difference as a philosophy of subjectivity which, however inspired by poststructuralism, was further developed by feminists. The main features of this philosophy are outlined both in terms of its style and of its vision of woman as subject. The notion of ‘difference’ is analyzed in details, as the central concept that sustains the feminist nomadic philosophy of a subject that is both complex and situated, politically empowered and epistemologically legitimate.

Type
Research Article
Information
Hypatia , Volume 8 , Issue 1 , Winter 1993 , pp. 1 - 13
Copyright
Copyright © 1993 by Hypatia, Inc.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Benhabib, Seyla. 1992. Situating the self. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Benhabib, Seyla and Drucilla, Cornell 1987. Feminism as critique. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Braidotti, Rosi. 1989. The politics of ontological difference. In Between feminism and psychoanalysis, ed. Brennan, Teresa. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Braidotti, Rosi. 1991. Patterns of dissonance. Cambridge: Polity Press; New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Braidotti, Rosi. N.D.a. Towards a genderized universal, or: From she‐self to she‐other. In Beyond equality and difference, ed. Bock, Gisela and James, Sue. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Braidotti, Rosi. N.D.b. Metaphysics and metabolism: Feminist Deleuzian tracks. In Gilles Deleuze: Theory, text and practice, ed. Boundas, K.New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Butler, Judith. 1987. Subjects of desire. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Butler, Judith. 1990. Gender trouble. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Chatelet, François. 1973. La philosophie des professeurs. Paris: U.G.E.Google Scholar
Code, Lorraine. 1991. What can she know?. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
De Lauretis, Teresa. 1984. Alice doesn't. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Lauretis, Teresa. 1986. Technologies of gender. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
De Lauretis, Teresa. 1990a. Sexual Difference: A theory of socio‐symbolic practice. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
De Lauretis, Teresa. 1990b. Upping the anti (sic) in feminist theory. In Conflicts in feminism, ed. Hirsch, Marianne and Fox Keller, Evelyn. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
De Lauretis, Teresa. 1990c. Eccentric subjects: Feminist theory and historical consciousness. Feminist Studies 16(1): 115–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Derrida, Jacques. 1976. Of grammatology, trans. Gayatri, Spivak. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Deleuze, Gilles. 1968. Spinoza et le problème de l'expression. Paris: Minuit.Google Scholar
Deleuze, Gilles. 1970. Nietsche et la philosophie. Paris: P.U.F. Translated by Hugh Tomlinson under the title Nietzsche and philosophy. New York: Columbia University Press, 1983.Google Scholar
Deleuze, Gilles. 1972. Difference and repetition. Paris: P.U.F.Google Scholar
Deleuze, Gilles. 1973. La pensée nomade. Paris: U.G.E.Google Scholar
Deleuze, Gilles. 1977. Dialogues. Paris: Flammarion. Translated by Hugh Tomlinson and Barbara Habberjam under the title Dialogues. New York: Columbia University Press, 1987.Google Scholar
Deleuze, Gilles and Felix, Guattari. 1975. Anti‐Oedipe. Paris: MinuitlTranslated by Robert Hurley, Mark Seem, and Helen R. Lane as Anti‐Oedipus: Capitalims and schizophrenia. New York: Viking Press, 1979.Google Scholar
Flax, Jane. 1990. Thinking fragments. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. 1971. L'ordre du discours. Paris: Gallimard. Translated by A.M. Sheridan Smith under the title The Archeology of knowledge. New York: Pantheon, 1972.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. 1975. Les mots et les choses. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. 1971. L'ordre du discours. Paris: Gallimard. Translated by A.M. Sheridan Smith under the title The Archeology of knowledge. New York: Pantheon, 1972.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. 1977. Surveiller et punir. Paris: Gallimard. Translated by Alan Sheridan under the title Discipline and punish. New York: Random House Vintage, 1979.Google Scholar
Haraway, Donna. 1990. Simians, cyborgs and women. London: Free Association Book; New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Harding, Sandra. 1991 Whose science? Whose knowledge? Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Irigaray, Luce. 1974. Speculum de l'autre femme. Paris: Minuit. Translated by Gillian C. Gill under the title Speculum of the other woman. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1985.Google Scholar
Kofman, Sarah. 1978. Aberrations: le devenir‐femme d'Auguste Comte. Paris: Flammarion.Google Scholar
Kristeva, Julia. 1988. Women's time. In Feminist theory: A critique of ideology, ed. Nanerl, O. Keohane. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Lyotard, Jean‐François. 1979. La condition postmoderne. Paris: Minuit. Translated by Geoff Bennington under the title The postmodern condition. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1989.Google Scholar
Lyotard, Jean‐François. 1986. Le postmoderne expliqué aux enfants. Paris: Galilée.Google Scholar
Rich, Adrienne. 1976. Of woman born. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
Rich, Adrienne. 1979. On lies, secrets and silence. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
Rich, Adrienne. 1985. Blood, bread and poetry. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
Rozler, Martha. 1990. Catalogue of the “Decade Show” at the New Modern Art Museum, New York.Google Scholar
Wittig, Monique. 1992. The straight mind and other essays. New York: Harvester.Google Scholar