Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T21:28:44.241Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Educating For Silence: Renaissance Women and the Language Arts∗

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 March 2020

Joan Gibson
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In the Renaissance, educating for philosophy was integrated with educating for an active role in society, and both were conditioned by the prevailing educational theories based on humanist revisions of the trivium. I argue that women's education in the Renaissance remained tied to grammar while the education of men was directed toward action through eloquence. This is both a result of and a condition for the greater restriction on the social opportunities for women.

Type
Research Article
Information
Hypatia , Volume 4 , Issue 1: Special Issue: The History of Women in Philosophy , Spring 1989 , pp. 9 - 27
Copyright
Copyright © 1989 by Hypatia, Inc.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ashworth, E. J. 1982. The eclipse of medieval logic. In The Cambridge history of later medieval philosophy. Kretzman, N., Kenny, A. and Pinborg, J., eds. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ashworth, E. J. 1988. Traditional logic. In The Cambridge history of Renaissance philosophy. Schmitt, C. B. and Skinner, Q., eds. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bochénski, I. M. 1970. A history of formal logic. Thomas, I., trans, and ed. New York: Chelsea Publishing Co.Google Scholar
Bouwsma, W. J. 1973. The culture of Renaissance humanism. AHA Pamphlet 401. Washington, D. C: American Historical Association.Google Scholar
Chamberlain, L. 1988. Gender and the metaphorics of translation. Signs: 13 (3):454–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elyot, T. 1962. The boke named the govemour. New York: E. P. Dutton.Google Scholar
Friedman, A. T. 1985. The influence of humanism on the education of girls and boys in Tudor England. The History of Education Quarterly 25 (1–2) 57–7010.2307/368891CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grafton, A. and Jardine, R. 1986. From humanism to the humanities: Education and the liberal arts in fifteenth‐ and sixteenth‐century Europe. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Gray, H. 1963. Renaissance humanism: The pursuit of eloquence. Journal of the History of Ideas 24:497–514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heath, T. 1971. Logical grammar, grammatical logic and humanism in three German universities. Studies in the Renaissance, 18: 9–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holm, J. B. 1987. The myth of a feminist humanism: Thomas Salter's The mirrhor of modestie. In Ambiguous realities: Women in the Middle Ages and Renaissance. Levin, C. and Watson, J. eds., Detroit: Wayne State University Press.Google Scholar
Howell, W. S. 1961. Logic and rhetoric in Errand, 1500–1700. New York: Russell & Russell.Google Scholar
Jardine, L. 1974. The place of dialectic teaching in sixteenth‐century Cambridge. Studies in the Renaissance, 21: 31–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jardine, L. 1975. Humanism and the sixteenth‐century Cambridge arts course. History of Education 4:16–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jardine, L. 1976. Humanism and dialectic in sixteenth‐century Cambridge: A preliminary investigation. In Classical influences on European culture, AD 1500–1700. Bolgar, R. R., ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Jardine, L. 1977. Lorenzo Valla and the intellectual origins of humanist dialectic. Journal of the History of Philosophy, 15: 143–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jardine, L. 1982. Humanism and the teaching of logic. In The Cambridge history of later medieval philosophy. Kretzman, N., Kenny, A. and Pinborg, J., eds. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Jardine, L. 1983. Still harping on daughters: Women and drama in the age of Shakespeare. N. J.: Barnes and Noble Books.Google Scholar
Jardine, L. 1988. Humanistic logic. In The Cambridge history of Renaissance philosophy., Schmitt, C. B. and Skinner, Q., eds. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Jordan, C. 1986. Feminism and the humanists: The case for Sir Thomas Elyot's Defense of good women. In Rewriting the Renaissance: The discourses of sexual difference in early modem Europe. Ed. Ferguson, M. W., Quilligan, M., and Vickers, N. J.Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Kelly (Gadol), J. [1977] 1984. Did women have a Renaissance? In Women, history, and theory: The essays of Joan Kelly. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
King, M. L. 1976. Thwarted ambitions: Six learned women of the Italian Renaissance. Soundings: An Interdisciplinary Journal 59 (Fall) 280–304.Google Scholar
King, M. L. 1978. The religious retreat of Isotta Nogarola (1418–1466): Sexism and its consequences in the fifteenth century. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 3 (4):807–822.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, M. L. 1980. Book‐lined cells: Women and humanism in the early Italian Renaissance. In Beyond their sex: Learned women of the European past. Labalme, P. H., ed. N. Y.: New York University.Google Scholar
King, M. L. and Rabil, A. Jr., eds. 1981. Her immaculate hand: Selected works by and about the women humanists of quattrocento Italy. Medieval & Renaissance texts & studies, (vol. 20). Binghamton, N. Y.: Center for Medieval and Early Renaissance Studies, State University of New York at Binghamton.Google Scholar
Kneale, W. and Kneale, M. 1962. The development of logic. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kraye, J. 1988. Moral philosophy. In The Cambridge history of Renaissance philosophy. Schmitt, C. B. and Skinner, Q., eds. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kristeller, P. 1988. Humanism. In The Cambridge history of Renaissance philosophy. Schmitt, C. B. and Skinner, Q., eds. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
McCutcheon, E. 1987. Margaret More Roper: The learned woman in Tudor England. In Women writers of the Renaissance and Reformation. Wilson, K. M., ed. Athens: University of Georgia Press.Google Scholar
Montaigne, M. 1967. Complete works of Montaigne. Frame, D. M., trans. Stanford, Cal.: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
More, T. 1947. The correspondence of Sir Thomas More. Rogers, E. F., ed. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Mozans, H. J. (J. A. Zahm). 1913. Women in science. N. Y.: D. Appleton and Co.Google Scholar
Mulcaster, R. 1971. Positions. Abridged and ed. DeMolen, R. L.Classics in Education 44. N. Y.: Teachers College Press, Columbia University.Google Scholar
Novy, M. 1983. Shakespeare's female characters as actors and audience. In The woman's part: Feminist criticism of Shakespeare. Lanz, C. R. S., Greene, G., Neely, C. T., eds. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
O'Faolin, J. and Martines, L. eds., 1973. Not in God's image. N. Y.: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Ong, W. J. 1971. Rhetoric, romance and technobgy: Studies in the interaction of expression and culture. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Ong, W. J. 1981. Agonistic structures in academia: Past to present. In Fighting for life: Contest, sexuality, and consciousness. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Percival, W. K. 1982. Changes in the approach to language. In The Cambridge history of later medieval philosophy. Kretzman, N., Kenny, A. and Pinborg, J., eds. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rabil, A. Jr. 1981. Laura Cereta: Quattrocento humanist. Medieval & Renaissance texts & studies, (vol. 3). Binghamton, N. Y.: Center for Medieval and Early Renaissance Studies, State University of New York at Binghamton.Google Scholar
Seigal, J. E. 1968. Rhetoric and philosophy in Renaissance humanism: Ciceronian elements in early quattrocento thought and their historical setting. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stone, L. 1977. The family, sex and marriage in England, 1500–1800. N. Y.: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Vasoli, C. 1988. The Renaissance concept of philosophy. In The Cambridge history of Renaissance philosophy. Schmitt, C. B. and Skinner, Q., eds. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Vickers, B. 1988. Rhetoric and poetics. In The Cambridge history of Renaissance philosophy. Schmitt, C. B. and Skinner, Q., eds. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Vives, J. L. 1912. Vives and the Renascence education of women. Watson, F., ed. N. Y.: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Vives, J. L. [1913] 1971. Vives: On education. (De tradendis disdplinis) Watson, F., trans. Totowa, N. J.: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Warnicke, R. M. 1983. Women of the English Renaissance and Reformation. Contributions in Women's Studies, no. 38. Westport, Conn.: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
Warnke, F. J. 1987. Aphrodite's priestess, love's martyr. In Women writers of the Renaissance and Reformation. Wilson, K. M., ed. Athens: University of Georgia Press.Google Scholar
Wayne, V. 1985. Some sad sentence: Vives’ instruction of a Christian woman. In Silent but for the word: Tudor women as patrons, translators and writers of religious works. Hannay, M. P., ed. Kent, Ohio: Kent State University Press.Google Scholar
Wilson, K. 1987. Introduction. In Women writers of the Renaissance and Reformation. Wilson, K. M., ed. Athens: University of Georgia Press.Google Scholar
Woodbridge, L. 1984. Women and the English Renaissance: Literature and the nature of women 1540–1620. Urbana and Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Woodward, W. H. [1897] 1921. Vittorino da Feltre and other humanist educators: Essays & versions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Woodward, W. H. 1904] 1964. Desiderius Erasmus concerning the aim and method of education. Classics in Education, No. 19, Bureau of Publications, Teachers College, Columbia University, New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Woodward, W. H. 1906] 1965. Studies in education during the Age of the Renaissance: 1400–1600. New York: Russell & Russell.Google Scholar