Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T22:27:07.319Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Editor's Introduction–Emancipation: Rethinking Subjectivity, Power, and Change

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2020

Susanne Lettow
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Introduction
Information
Hypatia , Volume 30 , Issue 3: Special Issue: Emancipation , Summer 2015 , pp. 501 - 512
Copyright
Copyright © 2015 by Hypatia, Inc.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ahmed, Sara. 2010. The promise of happiness. Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Alcoff, Linda Martín. 2011. An epistemology for the next revolution. Transmodernity: A Journal of Peripheral Cultural Production for the Luso‐Hispanic World 1 (2): 67–78.Google Scholar
Benhabib, Seyla. 1995. Feminism and postmodernism. In Feminist contentions: A philosophical exchange, ed. Benhabib, Seyla, Butler, Judith, Cornell, Drucilla and Fraser, Nancy, with an introduction by Nicholson, Linda. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Butler, Judith. 1990. Gender trouble. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Braidotti, Rosi. 2002. Metamorphoses: Towards a materialist theory of becoming. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Browne, Victoria. 2014. The persistence of patriarchy: Operation Yewtree and the return to 1970s feminism. Radical Philosophy 188: 9–19.Google Scholar
Deutscher, Penelope. 2014. Analogy of analogy: Animals and slaves in Mary Wollstonecraft's Defense of Women's Rights. In Reproduction, race, and gender in philosophy and the early life sciences, ed. Lettow, Susanne. Albany: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
Fraser, Nancy. 2013. Between marketization and social protection. In Fortunes of feminism: From state‐managed capitalism to neoliberal crisis. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Irigaray, Luce. 1975/1985. The power of discourse and the subordination of the feminine. In This sex which is not one. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. 1784/2003. An answer to the question: What is enlightenment? In Kant: Political writings, ed. Reiss, H. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Koselleck, Reinhart. 2002. The limits of emancipation: A conceptual‐historical sketch. In The practice of conceptual history: Timing history, spacing concepts. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Koselleck, Reinhart, and Martin Grass, Karl. 1975. Emanzipation. In Geschichtliche grundbegriffe: Historisches lexikon zur politisch‐sozialen sprache in Deutschland, vol. 2, ed. Brunner, Otto, Conze, Werner, and Koselleck, Reinhart. Stuttgart: Klett‐Cotta.Google Scholar
Scott, Joan Wallach. 2012. The vexed relationship of emancipation and equality. History of the Present 2 (2): 148–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, Joseph T. 1881. Emancipation: Its course and progress from 1102 to 1875. Hampton, Va.: Normal School Steam Press Print.Google Scholar