Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T06:36:41.231Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Culture, Communication, and Latina Feminist Philosophy: Toward a Critical Phenomenology of Culture

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2020

Jacqueline M. Martinez
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An explication of the phenomenological sensibilities found in the work of Gloria Anzaldúa and other Latina feminist philosophers offers insight into the problem of bringing philosophy into greater relevance beyond academic and scholarly worlds. This greater relevance entails clear and direct contact with the immediacy of our communicative relationships with others, both inside and outside the academy, and allows for an interrogation of the totalizing perceptions that are at work within normative processes of epistemological legitimation. As a result of this interrogation, it is possible to cultivate perceptual capacities related to culture that intervene in the normatively tacit cultural dispositions that often limit the possibilities of understanding.

Type
Articles
Information
Hypatia , Volume 29 , Issue 1: Special Issue: Interstices: Inheriting Women of Color Feminist Philosophy , Winter 2014 , pp. 221 - 236
Copyright
Copyright © 2014 by Hypatia, Inc.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

I would like to thank Marianna Ortega and the participants in the 2011 and 2012 Roundtable on Latina Feminism for their invaluable feedback on and engagement with earlier versions of this work. I am deeply grateful for the time, energy, and commitment Marianna and the other participants brought to our gatherings. I would also like to thank the editor and the anonymous reviewers whose insightful comments were essential in allowing me to bring this work to fruition.

References

Alarcón, Norma. 1990. The theoretical subject(s) of This Bridge Called My Back and Anglo‐American feminism. In Making face, making soul/haciendo caras: Creative and critical perspectives by women of color, ed. Anzaldúa, Gloria. San Francisco: Aunt Lute Foundation.Google Scholar
Alcoff, Linda Martín. 1991–1992. The problem of speaking for others. Cultural Critique 20 (Winter): 5–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alcoff, Linda Martín. 2006. Visible identities: Race, gender and the self. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anzaldúa, Gloria. 1987. Borderlands/la frontera: The new mestiza. San Francisco: Aunt Lute Foundation.Google Scholar
Anzaldúa, Gloria 1990. Making face, making soul/haciendo caras: Creative and critical perspectives by women of color. San Francisco: Aunt Lute Foundation.Google Scholar
Anzaldúa, Gloria. 2002. Now let us shift… the path of conocimiento… inner work, public acts. In This bridge we call home: Radical visions for transformation, ed. Anzaldúa, Gloria E. and Keating, Analouise. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Carter, Irl. 2011. Human behavior in the social environment: A social systems approach, 6th ed. New Brunswick, NJ.: Aldin Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
Cassirer, Ernst. 2000. The logic of the cultural sciences. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Fisher, Linda, and Embree, Lester, eds. 2000. Feminist phenomenology. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gamson, Joshua. 2000. Sexualities, queer theory, and qualitative research. In Handbook of qualitative research methods, 2nd ed., ed. Denzin, Norman K. and Lincoln, Yvonna S.Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage Publications, Inc.Google Scholar
Gergen, M. M., and Gergen, K. J. 2000. Qualitative inquiry: Tensions and transformations. In Handbook of qualitative research methods, 2nd ed., ed. Denzin, Norman K. and Lincoln, Yvonna S.Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage Publications, Inc.Google Scholar
Gordon, Lewis R. 2006. Disciplinary decadence: Living thought in trying times. Boulder, Colo.: Paradigm Publishers.Google Scholar
Kaplan, Abraham. 1964/1998. The conduct of inquiry: Methodology for behavioral science. New Brunswick, N.J.: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
Lanigan, Richard. 1988. Phenomenology of communication: Merleau‐Ponty's thematics in communicology and semiology. Pittsburgh: Duquesne University Press.Google Scholar
Lanigan, Richard. 1992. The human science of communicology: A phenomenology of discourse in Foucault and Merleau‐Ponty. Pittsburgh: Duquesne University Press.Google Scholar
Lanigan, Richard. 2008. Communicology. In International encyclopedia of communication, vol. 3, ed. Donsbach, Wolfgang. Oxford: Wiley‐Blackwell Publishing Co.Google Scholar
Lugones, María. 1987. Playfulness, ‘world’‐traveling, and loving perception. Hypatia 2 (2): 3–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lugones, Maria. 2003. Pilgrimages/peregrinajes: Theorizing coalition against multiple oppressions. Lanham, Md.: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Martinez, Jacqueline M. 2000. Phenomenology of Chicana experience and identity: Communication and transformation in praxis. Lanham, Md.: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Martinez, Jacqueline M. 2003. Racisms, heterosexisms, identities: A semiotic phenomenology of self understanding”. Journal of Homosexuality 45 (2/3): 109–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martinez, Jacqueline M. 2006. Interrogating prejudice: Cassirer and Merleau‐Ponty on discursive violence and methodological reflexivity in the study of culture. Presented at the International Communicology Institute's Fourth Biennial Summer Symposium and Professional Development Seminar. Skagen, Denmark, June 25–July 1.Google Scholar
Martinez, Jacqueline M. 2010. Lewis Gordon's contribution to the study of communication: Beyond disciplinary decadence. Atlantic Journal of Communication 19 (1): 17–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCormick, Peter, and Elliston, Frederick A. 1981. Husserl, shorter works. Notre Dame, Ind.: Notre Dame University Press.Google Scholar
Merleau‐Ponty, Maurice. 1962/1981. Phenomenology of perception. Trans. Colin Smith (revised translation by Forrest Williams and David Guerrière). New York: Humanities Press.Google Scholar
Moraga, Cherríe, and Anzaldúa, Gloria, eds. 1981. This bridge called my back: Writings by radical women of color. New York: Kitchen Table: Women of Color Press.Google Scholar
Moran, Dermot. 2000. Introduction to phenomenology. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Ortega, Mariana. 2001. “New mestizas”, “‘world’‐travelers”,and “dasein”: Phenomenology and the multi‐voiced, multi‐cultural self. Hypatia 16 (3): 1–29.Google Scholar
Pérez, Emma. 1991. Gulf dreams. In Chicana lesbians: The girls our mothers warned us about, ed. Trujillo, Carla. Berkeley: Third Woman Press.Google Scholar
Sandoval, Chela. 1991. U.S. third world feminism: The theory and method of oppositional consciousness in the postmodern world. Genders 10: 1–24.Google Scholar
Sandoval, Chela. 2000. Methodology of the oppressed. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Schutte, Ofelia. 1998. Cultural alterity: Cross‐cultural communication and feminist theory in north‐south contexts. Hypatia 13 (2): 53–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schutz, Alfred. 1967. The phenomenology of the social world. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
Spiegelberg, Herbert. 1982. The phenomenological movement, 3rd rev. and enlarged ed. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Torres, Lourdes, and Pertusa, Inmaculada. 2003. Tortilleras: Hispanic and U.S. Latina lesbian expression. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
Trujillo, Carla, ed. 1991. Chicana lesbians: The girls our mothers warned us about. Berkeley: Third Woman Press.Google Scholar
Trujillo, Carla, ed. 1998. Living chicana theory. Berkeley: Third Woman Press.Google Scholar