Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T22:39:25.866Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Connections and Guilt

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 March 2020

Abstract

Moral philosphy, in both the Kantian and Utilitarian traditions, has it as an ideal to provide a set of principles which dominate all other considerations and which will consistently resolve all moral problems. This is often taken to imply that guilt or remorse is irrational if it occurs in circumstances in which one does ones duty but also harms others. This essay explores the possibility of giving up this ideal in favor of a more complex view of morality in which resolutions of conflict are worked out affectively rather than logically.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © 1987 by Hypatia, Inc.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bowlby, John. 1969. Attachment. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Freud, Sigmund. 1914. On narcissism: An introduction. In General psychological theory. New York: Collier Books.Google Scholar
Freud, Sigmund. 1925. Some psychical consequences of the anatomical distinction between the sexes. In Standard Edition. Vol. XIX. London: Hogarth Press.Google Scholar
Gilligan, Carol. 1982. In a different voice. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Hume, David. 1740. Treatise on human nature, Selby‐Bigge edition, 1880. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Klein, Melanie. 1975. Love, guilt and reparation and other essays, 1921‐45. London: Hogarth Press.Google Scholar
Kohlberg, Lawrence. 1981. Essays in moral psychology; Volume 1, The philosophy of moral development. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Mahler, M., Pine, F., and Bergman, A. 1975. The psychological birth of the human infant. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Rawls, John. 1971. A theory of justice. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Winnicott, David. 1958. Psychoanalysis and the sense of guilt. In Psychoanalysis and contemporary thought, ed. Sutherland, John D.London: Hogarth Press.Google Scholar