Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T06:37:54.711Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Commercial Contract Pregnancy in India, Judgment, and Resistance to Oppression

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2020

Katy Fulfer
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Feminist scholars have done much to identify oppressive forces within transnational commercial contract pregnancy and its social context that may coerce women into becoming gestational laborers. Feminists have also been careful not to depict gestational laborers as merely passive victims of oppression, though there is disagreement about the degree to which contract pregnancy offers opportunities for agency. In this article I consider how women who sell gestational labor may be agents against their oppression. I make explicit connections between resistance and judgment, which I will take to be a critically considered, intersubjective evaluative claim. Drawing on work by Jennifer Nedelsky and Hannah Arendt, my main argument will be that individual judgments can better enable oppressed persons to resist some aspects of their oppression, and that judgment helps to (further) develop agential capacities, in particular, the capacity for a person to be self‐constituting, to see herself as giving reasons for her own actions. I use Indian contract pregnancy as a case study to think through connections between resistance and judgment.

Type
Articles
Information
Hypatia , Volume 30 , Issue 4 , Fall 2015 , pp. 846 - 861
Copyright
Copyright © 2015 by Hypatia, Inc.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Arendt, Hannah. 1958. The human condition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Arendt, Hannah. 1961. Between past and future. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
Arendt, Hannah. 1971. Life of the mind. New York: Harcourt.Google Scholar
Arendt, Hannah. 1982. Lectures on Kant's political philosophy, ed. Beiner, Ronald. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arendt, Hannah. 2003. Responsibility and judgment, ed. Kohn, Jerome. New York: Schocken.Google Scholar
Babbitt, Susan E. 1996. Impossible dreams: Rationality, integrity, and moral imagination. Boulder, Colo.: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Bailey, Alison. 2011. Reconceiving surrogacy: Toward a reproductive justice account of Indian surrogacy. Hypatia 26 (4): 715–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ballantyne, Angela. 2014. Exploitation in cross‐border reproductive care. IJFAB 7 (2): 75–99.Google Scholar
Banerjee, Amrita. 2010. Reorienting the ethics of transnational surrogacy as a feminist pragmatist. The Pluralist 5 (3): 107–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Banerjee, Amrita. 2014. Race and a transnational reproductive caste system: Indian transnational surrogacy. Hypatia 29 (1): 113–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benson, Paul. 1994. Free agency and self‐worth. Journal of Philosophy 91 (12): 650–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crozier, G. K. D., Johnson, Jennifer L., and Hajzler, Christopher. 2014. At the intersections of emotional and biological labor: Understanding transnational commercial surrogacy as social reproduction. IJFAB 7 (2): 45–74.Google Scholar
Fulfer, Katy. 2014. Embodied judgment and Hannah Arendt: From Boethius and Huck Finn to transnational feminisms. Phaenex 9 (2): 64–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gupta, Jyotsna Agnihotri. 2012. Reproductive biocrossings: Indian egg donors and surrogates in the globalized fertility market. IJFAB 5 (1): 25–51.Google Scholar
Haworth, Abigail. 2007. Surrogate mothers: Womb for rent. Marie Claire. http://www.marieclaire.com/world-reports/news/surrogate-mothers-india (accessed February 26, 2013).Google Scholar
Hill, Thomas E. 1991. Autonomy and self‐respect. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jha, Brajesh. 2006. Employment, wages, and productivity in Indian agriculture. New Delhi: Institute of Economic Growth, University of Delhi Enclave.Google Scholar
Khader, Serene J. 2011. Adaptive preferences and women's empowerment. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Khader, Serene J. 2013. Intersectionality and the ethics of transnational commercial surrogacy. IJFAB 6 (1): 68–90.Google Scholar
Mackenzie, Catriona. 2014. Three dimensions of autonomy: A relational analysis. In Autonomy, oppression, and gender, ed. Veltman, Andrea and Piper, Mark. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mohanty, Chandra Talpade. 2003. Feminism without borders: Decolonizing theory, practicing solidarity. Durham, N.C., and London: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Narayan, Uma. 1997. Dislocating cultures: Identities, traditions, and third‐world feminism. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Nedelsky, Jennifer. 2011. Law's relations. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Nedelsky, Jennifer. 2012. The reciprocal relation of judgment and autonomy: Walking in another's shoes and which shoes to walk in. In Being relational, ed. Downie, Jocelyn and Llewellyn, Jennifer J. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press.Google Scholar
Pande, Amrita. 2009. Not an “angel”, not a “whore”: Surrogates as “dirty” workers in India. Indian Journal of Gender Studies 16 (2): 141–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pande, Amrita. 2010. Commercial surrogacy in India: Manufacturing a perfect mother‐worker. Signs 35 (4): 969–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Panitch, Vida. 2013a. Global surrogacy: Exploitation to empowerment. Journal of Global Ethics 9 (3): 329–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Panitch, Vida. 2013b. Surrogate tourism and reproductive rights. Hypatia 28 (2): 274–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Twine, France Winddance. 2011. Outsourcing the womb: Race, class, and gestational surrogacy in a global market. Framing 21st Century Social Issues. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar