Hostname: page-component-6bf8c574d5-956mj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-16T22:12:13.827Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Comment on Zita's Review of The Science Question in Feminism

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 March 2020

Betty Safford
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The claim is made that although she undervalues the work in question, Zita poses important questions for feminist philosophers of science. Reference ismade to further evidence supporting Harding's extended argument that science is neither characterized by objectivity nor value-free, and a concern which may have some relationship to Zita's “feminist question of the science question in feminism” is noted.

Type
Comment/Reply
Information
Hypatia , Volume 5 , Issue 1 , Spring 1990 , pp. 181 - 182
Copyright
Copyright © 1990 by Hypatia, Inc.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Easlea, Brian. 1983. Fathering the unthinkable, masculinity, scientists and nuclear arms race. London: Pluto Press.Google Scholar
Harding, Sandra. 1986. The Science question in feminism. Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Zita, Jacquelyn N. 1988. Review Essay/A Critical Analysis of Sandra Harding's The Science question m feminism. lnHypatia 3 (1): 157–168.Google Scholar