Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T22:23:56.216Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Cognitive Ableism and Disability Studies: Feminist Reflections on the History of Mental Retardation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 March 2020

Licia Carlson
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper examines five groups of women that were instrumental in the emergence of the category of “feeblemindedness” in the United States. It analyzes the dynamics of oppression and power relations in the following five groups of women: “feebleminded” women, institutional caregivers, mothers, researchers, and reformists. Ultimately, I argue that a feminist analysis of the history of mental retardation is necessary to serve as a guide for future feminist work on cognitive disability.

Type
Research Article
Information
Hypatia , Volume 16 , Issue 4: Special Issue: Feminism and Disability, Part 1 , Fall 2001 , pp. 124 - 146
Copyright
Copyright © 2001 by Hypatia, Inc.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alcoff, Linda Martín. 2000. What should white people do? In Decentering the center: Philosophy for a multicultural, postcolonial, and feminist world, ed. Narayan, Uma and Harding, Sandra. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Bern, Sandra. 1993. Lenses of gender: Transforming the debate on sexual inequality. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Bremner, Robert H. 1960. American philanthropy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Caplan, Paula. 1989. Don't blame mother: Mending the mother‐daughter relationship. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Carlson, Licia. 1998. Mindful subjects: Classification and cognitive disability. Ph.D. diss., University of Toronto.Google Scholar
Chesler, Phyllis. 1983. Women and madness. New York: Avon.Google Scholar
Colligan, Sumi. 1999. Wherein lie the “secrets of life?”: An argument against biological essentialism. Journal of Gay, Lesbian, and Bisexual Identity 4(1) 73–85.Google Scholar
Davis, Lennard. 1997. The disability studies reader. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Dybwad, Gunnar, and Bersani, Hank Jr., eds. 1996. New voices: Self‐advocacy by people with disabilities. Cambridge: Brookline.Google Scholar
Ferguson, Philip M. 1994. Abandoned to their fate: Social policy and practice toward severely retarded people in America, 1820–1920. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
Fine, Michelle, and Asch, Adrienne, eds. 1988. Women with disabilities. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. 1979. Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison. Trans. Sheridan Smith, A.New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. 1983. The subject and power. In Michel Foucault: Beyond structuralism and hermeneutics, by Dreyfus, Hubert L. and Rabinow, Paul. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. 1988. Madness and civilization: A history of insanity in the age of reason. Trans. Howard, Richard. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. 1990. The history of sexuality, volume I: An introduction. Trans. Hurley, Robert. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. 1994. The birth of the clinic: An archaeology of medical perception. Trans. Sheridan Smith, A.New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
Francis, Leslie Pickering, and Silvers, Anita, eds. 2000. Americans with disabilities: Exploring implications of the law for individuals and institutions. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Gordon, Linda. 1976. Woman's body, woman's right: A social history of birth control in America. New York: Grossman.Google Scholar
Hasain, Marouf Arif. 1996. The rhetoric of eugenics in Anglo‐American thought. Athens: The University of Georgia Press.Google Scholar
Hubbard, Ruth. 1990. The politics of women's biology. New Brunswick, N.J.: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
Johnson, Kelley. 1998. Deinstitutionalising women: An ethnographic study of institutional closure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kanner, Leo. 1964. A history of the care and the study of the mentally retarded. Springfield, Ill.: Charles C. Thomas.Google Scholar
Kittay, Eva Feder. 1999. Love's labor: Essays on equality, dependence and care. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Lakoff, George. 1987. Women, fire and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Linton, Simi. 1998. Claiming disability: Knowledge and identity. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Luckasson, et al. 1992. Mental retardation: Definition, classification, and systems of supports 9th ed. Washington, D. C.: American Association on Mental Retardation.Google Scholar
Macklin, Ruth, and Gaylin, Willard. 1981. Mental retardation and sterilization: A problem of competency and paternalism. New York: Plenum Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Macintyre, Alasdair. 1999. Dependent rational animals. Chicago: Open Court.Google Scholar
McMahan, Jeff. 1996. Cognitive disability, misfortune, and justice. Philosophy and Public Affairs 25(1): 3–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morris, Jenny. 1991. Pride and prejudice: Transforming attitudes to disability. Philadelphia: New Society Publishers.Google Scholar
Murphy, Jeffrie. 1984. Do the retarded have a right not to be eaten? In Ethics and mental retardation, ed. Kopelman, Loretta and Moskop, John. Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Narayan, Uma. 1997. Dislocating cultures: Identities, traditions and Third World feminism. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Noll, Steven. 1995. Feeble‐minded in our midst: Institutions for the mentally retarded in the South, 1900–1940. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Oliver, Michael. 1990. The politics of disablement. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parens, Erik, and Asch, Adrienne, eds. 2000. Prenatal testing and disability rights. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Rafter, Nicole Hahn. 1988. White trash: The eugenic family studies, 1877–1919. Boston: Northeastern University Press.Google Scholar
Rapp, Rayna. 1988. Chromosomes and communication: The discourse of genetic counseling. Medical Anthropology Quarterly 2: 121–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rapp, Rayna. 1999. Testing women, testing the fetus: The social impact of amniocentesis in America. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Reilly, Phillip R. 1991. The surgical solution: A history of involuntary sterilization in the United States. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Rosen, Marvin, Clark, Gerald, and Kivitz, Marvin, eds. 1975. The history of mental retardation: Collected papers, volume I. Baltimore: University Park Press.Google Scholar
Rothman, Barbara Katz. 1986. The tentative pregnancy: Prenatal diagnosis and the future of motherhood. New York: Viking.Google Scholar
Sanger, Margaret. 1920. Woman and the new race. New York: Brentano's.Google Scholar
Scheerenberger, R. C. 1983. A history of mental retardation. Baltimore: P. H. Brookes Publishing Co.Google Scholar
Scott, Anne Firor. 1990. Women's voluntary associations: From charity to reform. In Lady bountiful revisited: Women, philanthropy and power, ed. McCarthy, Kathleen. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
Seguin, Edouard. 1910. Idiocy and its treatment by the physiological method. Albany: Press of Brandow Printing Company.Google Scholar
Shapiro, Joseph. 1994. No pity: People with disabilities forging a new civil rights movement. New York: Times Books.Google Scholar
Showalter, Elaine. 1986. The female malady: Women, madness and English culture, 1830–1980. New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
Silvers, Anita. 1995. Reconciling equality to difference: Caring (f)or justice for people with disabilities. Hypatia 10(11): 30–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silvers, Anita, Wasserman, David, and Mahowald, Mary. 1998. Disability, difference, discrimination: Perspectives on justice in bioethics and public policy. Lanham, Md.: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Singer, Peter. 1995. Animal liberation. London: Pimlico.Google Scholar
Sloan, William, and Stevens, Harvey A. 1976. A century of concern: A history of the American Association on Mental Deficiency, 1876–1976 Washington, D.C.: The American Association on Mental Deficiency, Inc.Google Scholar
Snyder, Sharon, and Mitchell, David, eds. 1997. The body and physical difference: Discourses of disability. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Steinbock, Bonnie. 1994. Reproductive rights and responsibilities. Hastings Center Report 24(3): 15–16.Google ScholarPubMed
Stewart, William Rhinelander. 1911. The philanthropic work of Josephine Shaw Lowell. New York: The Macmillan Company.Google Scholar
Talbot, Mabel. 1964. Edouard Seguin: A study of an educational approach to the treatment of mentally defective children. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Taylor, Steve. 1996. Disability studies and mental retardation. Disability Studies Quarterly 16(3): 4–13.Google Scholar
Trent, James W. 1994. Inventing the feeble mind: A history of mental retardation in the United States. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Tyor, Peter. 1977. Denied the power to choose the good: Sexuality and mental defect in American medical practice, 1850–1920. Journal of Social History 10: 472–89.Google Scholar
Tyor, Peter, and Bell, Leland. 1984. Caring for the retarded in America. Westport, Conn.: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
Waugh, Joan. 1997. Unsentimental reformer: The life of Josephine Shaw Lowell. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wendell, Susan. 1996. The rejected body: Feminist philosophical reflections on disability. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Williams, Paul, and Shoultz, Bonnie. 1982. We can speak for ourselves: Self advocacy by mentally handicapped people. London: Souvenir Press.Google Scholar
Young, Iris Marion. 1990. Justice and the politics of difference. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar