Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T19:17:55.073Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Climate Change Science and Responsible Trust: A Situated Approach

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2020

Heidi Grasswick
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

I adopt a situated approach to the question of what would constitute responsible trust and/or distrust in climate change science, and I identify some of the major challenges for laypersons in their attempts to know well by placing their trust in climate change experts. I examine evidence that white males, as a group of relative privilege, are more likely to distrust the institutions of climate change science than are other demographic groups, and use this example to consider specific challenges facing those who occupy positions of privilege and who seek to place their epistemic trust wisely. I argue that the insights of feminist standpoint theory and epistemologies of ignorance concerning the role of positionality in knowledge production and the need for critical reflexivity can be applied to cases of epistemic trust as well; in some contexts, such as climate change science, considerations of how those differently situated from oneself place their trust will be valuable contributions to responsible assignments of trust.

Type
Articles
Information
Hypatia , Volume 29 , Issue 3: Special Issue: Climate Change , Summer 2014 , pp. 541 - 557
Copyright
Copyright © 2014 by Hypatia, Inc.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anderegg, William R. L., et al. 2010. Expert credibility in climate change. PNAS 107 (27): 12107–09.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Anderson, Elizabeth. 2011. Democracy, public policy, and lay assessments of scientific testimony. Episteme 8 (2): 144–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borick, Christopher, and Rabe, Barry. 2012. Fall 2011 national survey of American public opinion on climate change. Issues in Governance Studies 44 (February): 1–8.Google Scholar
Code, Lorraine. 2006. Ecological thinking: The politics of epistemic location. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daukas, Nancy. 2011. Altogether now: A virtue‐theoretic approach to pluralism in feminist epistemology. In Feminist epistemology and philosophy of science: Power in knowledge, ed. Grasswick, Heidi. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
Denton, Fatma. 2002. Climate change vulnerability, impacts, and adaptation: Why does gender matter? Gender and Development 10 (2): 10–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunlap, Riley, and McCright, Aaron. 2008. A widening gap: Republican and democratic views on climate change. Environment 50 (5): 26–35.Google Scholar
Dunlap, Riley, and McCright, Aaron. 2011. Organized climate change denial. In The Oxford handbook of climate change and society. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Flynn, James, Slovic, Paul, and Mertz, C. K. 1994. Gender, race, and perception of environmental health risks. Risk Analysis 14 (6): 1101–08.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fricker, Miranda. 2007. Epistemic injustice: Power and the ethics of knowing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Funtowicz, Silvio O., and Ravetz, Jerome R. 1993. Science for a post‐normal age. Futures 25 (7): 739–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grasswick, Heidi. 2010. Scientific and lay communities: Earning epistemic trust through knowledge sharing. Synthese 177 (3): 387–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grasswick, Heidi. 2011. Introduction: Feminist epistemology and philosophy of science in the twenty‐first century. In Feminist epistemology and philosophy of science: Power in knowledge, ed. Grasswick, Heidi. Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harding, Sandra. 1991. Whose science? Whose knowledge? Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Harding, Sandra. 2004. A socially relevant philosophy of science? Resources from standpoint theory's controversiality. Hypatia 19 (1): 192–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hardwig, John. 1991. The role of trust in knowledge. Journal of Philosophy 88 (12): 693–708.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hulme, Mike. 2009. Why we disagree about climate change. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
IPCC. 2007. Climate change 2007: Synthesis report. Contribution of working groups I, II and III to the fourth assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, ed. Core Writing Team, Pachauri, R. K. and Reisinger, A.Geneva: IPCC.Google Scholar
Jasanoff, Sheila. 2011. Cosmopolitan knowledge: Climate science and global civic epistemology. In The Oxford handbook of climate change and society, ed. Dryzek, John S., Norgaard, Richard B. and Schlosberg, David. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Jost, John T., Nosek, Brian A., and Gosling, Samuel D. 2008. Ideology: Its resurgence in social, personality, and political psychology. Perspectives on Psychological Science 3 (2): 126–36.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kahan, Dan, et al. 2007. Culture and identity‐protective cognition: Explaining the white‐male effect in risk perception. Journal of Empirical Legal Studies 4 (3): 465–505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kalof, Linda, Dietz, Thomas, Guagnano, Gregory, and Stern, Paul C. 2002. Race, gender and environmentalism: The atypical values and beliefs of white men. Race, Gender and Class 9 (2): 112–30.Google Scholar
Krosnick, Jon. 2011. Public views of climate scientists and their impact on public thinking. (Sackler Colloquia: The Science of Science Communication). http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T95hk631MQo (accessed September 15, 2012).Google Scholar
Malka, Ariel, Krosnick, Jon A., and Langer, Gary. 2009. The association of knowledge with concern about global warming: Trusted information sources shape public thinking. Risk Analysis 29 (5): 633–47.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mann, Michael E. 2012. The hockey stick and the climate wars: Dispatches from the front lines. New York: Columbia University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCright, Aaron. M. 2010. The effects of gender on climate change knowledge and concern in the American public. Population and Environment 32 (1): 66–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCright, Aaron M., and Dunlap, Riley E. 2011. Cool dudes: The denial of climate change among conservative white males in the United States. Global Environmental Change 21: 1163–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nature editors. 2010. Closing the climategate. Nature 468: 345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oreskes, Naomi. 2004. The scientific consensus on climate change. Science 306 (5702): 1686.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Oreskes, Naomi, and Conway, Erik M. 2010. Merchants of doubt: How a handful of scientists obscured the truth on issues from tobacco smoke to global warming. New York: Bloomsbury Press.Google Scholar
Origgi, Gloria. 2012. Epistemic injustice and epistemic trust. Social Epistemology 26 (2): 221–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pew Research Center for the People and the Press. 2008. A deeper partisan divide over global warming. Washington, DC: The Pew Research Center, May 8. http://www.people-press.org/2008/05/08/a-deeper-partisan-divide-over-global-warming/ (accessed March 1, 2013).Google Scholar
Saloranta, Tuomo M. 2001. Post‐normal science and the global climate change issue. Climatic Change 50 (4): 395–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scheman, Naomi. 2001. Epistemology resuscitated. In Engendering rationalities, ed. Tuana, Nancy and Morgen, Sandra. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Slovic, Paul. 1999. Trust, emotion, sex, politics, and science: Surveying the risk‐assessment battlefield. Risk Analysis 19 (4): 689–701.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Terry, Geraldine. 2009. No climate justice without gender justice: An overview of the issues. Gender and Development 17 (1): 5–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tuana, Nancy, and Sullivan, Shannon. 2006. Introduction: Feminist epistemologies of ignorance. Hypatia 21 (3): 1–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wylie, Alison. 2003. Why standpoint matters. In Science and other cultures: Issues in philosophies of science and technology, ed. Figueroa, Robert and Harding, Sandra. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Yale Project on Climate Change Communication. 2012. Americans' global warming beliefs and attitudes in March 2012. http://environment.yale.edu/climate/publications/Climate-Beliefs-March-2012/ (accessed March 1, 2013).Google Scholar