Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T01:08:18.906Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Beyond Gender Schemas: Improving the Advancement of Women in Academia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 March 2020

Virginia Valian
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Meeting Report
Information
Hypatia , Volume 20 , Issue 3 , Summer 2005 , pp. 198 - 213
Copyright
Copyright © 2005 by Hypatia, Inc.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bailey, Sandra. 1991. Some women faulting demand for equal pay. Washington Post, June 2, B9.Google Scholar
Biernat, Monica, Manis, Melvin, and Nelson, Thomas E. 1991. Stereotypes and standards of judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 60 (4):495–502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butler, Dore, and Geis, Florence L. 1990. Nonverbal affect responses to male and female leaders: Implications for leadership evaluation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 58:48–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dovidio, John F., Ellyson, Steve L., Keating, Caroline F., Heltman, Karen, and Brown, Clifford E. 1988. The relationship of social power to visual displays of dominance between men and women. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 54:233–42.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fiske, Susan T., and Taylor, Shelley E. 1991. Social cognition. 2nd ed. New York: McGraw‐Hill.Google Scholar
Gallo, Bill. 1996. A grand slam against women. Denver Westword, January 31, 47.Google Scholar
Glick, P., and Fiske, S. T. 2001. An ambivalent alliance: Hostile and benevolent sexism as complementary justifications for gender inequality. American Psychologist 56:109–118.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Glick, P., Fiske, S. T., Mladinic, A., Al, Et. 2000. Beyond prejudice as simple antipathy: Hostile and benevolent sexism across cultures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 79:763–75.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Heilman, Madeline E. 1980. The impact of situational factors on personnel decisions concerning women: Varying the sex composition of the applicant pool. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance 26:386–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirschfeld, L. 1997. The conceptual politics of race: Lessons from our children. Ethos 25:63–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoffman, C., and Hurst, N. 1990. Gender stereotypes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 58:197–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lerner, Melvin J. 1975. The justice motive in social behavior: An introduction. Journal of Social Issues 31:1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Long, J. Scott, ed. 2001. From scarcity to visibility. Washington, D. C: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
Long, J. Scott, and McGinnis, Robert. 1981. Organizational context and scientific productivity. American Sociological Review 46:422–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Major, Brenda. 1987. Gender, justice, and the psychology of entitlement. In Sex and gender: Review of personality and social psychology, vol. 7, ed. Shaver, Phillip and Hendrick, Christine. Newbury Park, Calif: Sage.Google Scholar
Martell, Richard F., Lane, David M., and Emrich, Cynthia. 1996. Male‐female differences: A computer simulation. American Psychologist 51:157–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, Carol Lynn, and Halverson, Charles. 1987. The roles of cognition in sex role acquisition. In Current conceptions of sex roles and sex typing: Theory and research, ed. Bruce Carter, D.New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
Merton, Robert K. 1968. The Matthew Effect in science. Science 159:56–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MIT Faculty Newsletter. 1999. A study on the status of women faculty in science at MIT. Special edition 11 (4).Google Scholar
National Science Foundation. 2000. Women, minorities, and persons with disabilities in science and engineering: 2000. Appendix, Table 5–24. Arlington, Va.: National Science Foundation.Google Scholar
Porter, Natalie, and Geis, Florence L. 1981. Women and nonverbal leadership cues: When seeing is not believing. In Gender and nonverbal behavior, ed. Mayo, Clara and Henley, Nancy. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Sonnert, Gerhard, and Holton, Gerald. 1996. Career patterns of women and men in the sciences. American Scientist 84:63–71.Google Scholar
Sonnert, Gerhard, and Holton, Gerald. 1995. Gender differences in science careers: The project access study. New Bruns wick, N.J.: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
Spence, Janet T., and Helmreich, Robert L. 1978. Masculinity and femininity: Their psychological dimensions, correlates, and antecedents. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Spence, Janet T., and Sawin, Linda L. 1985. Images of masculinity and femininity: A reconceptualization. In Women, gender, and social psychology, ed. O'Leary, Virginia E., Unger, Rhoda K., and Wallston, Barbara S.Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Trix, F., and Psenka, C. 2003. Exploring the color of glass: Letters of recommendation for female and male medical faculty. Discourse and society 14:191–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Valian, Virginia. 1998. Why so slow? The advancement of women. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar