Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T06:10:24.913Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

An Appreciation of Loves Labor

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 March 2020

Sara Ruddick
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This is a selective reading of Love's Labor: Essays on Women, Equality, and Dependency. My aim is twofold: to continue Love Labor's focus on dependency work and relations, adding certain distinctions and questions of my own; and to recognize the conjunction of three perspectives—theoretical, social/political, and personal—that strengthen this focus. I scant particulars of argument and ignore certain issues in the hope of providing a vivid outline of the rewards and demands of dependency as Eva Kittay envisions them.

Type
Symposium on Eva Kittay's Love's Labor: Essays on Women, Equality, and Dependency
Information
Hypatia , Volume 17 , Issue 3: Special Issue: Feminism and Disability, Part 2 , Summer 2002 , pp. 214 - 224
Copyright
Copyright © 2002 by Hypatia, Inc.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Hannah, Arendt. 1971. Thinking and moral considerations. Social Research 38(3): 417–46.Google Scholar
Hannah, ArendtImagination. 1973. In Lectures on Kant's political philosophy, ed. Beiner, Ronald. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Martha, Fineman. 1995. The neutered mother, the sexual family and other twentieth‐century tragedies. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Fricker, Miranda, and Hornsby, Jennifer, eds. 2000. The Cambridge companion to feminism in philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Haber, Joram G., and Halfon, Mark S., eds. 1998. Norms and values: Essays in honor of Virginia Held. Oxford: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Hanigsberg, Julia E., and Ruddick, Sara, eds. 1999. Mother troubles. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Virginia, Held ed. 1995. Justice and care. Oxford: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Kittay, Eva Feder. 1999. Love's labor: Essays on women, equality, and dependency. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Genevieve, Lloyd. 2000. Feminism in history of philosophy: Appropriating the past. In The Cambridge companion to feminism in philosophy, ed. Fricker, Miranda and Hornsby, Jennifer. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mackenzie, Catriona, and Stoljar, Natalie, eds. 2000. Relational autonomy. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Nancy, Mairs. 1996. Waist‐high in the world: A life among the nondisabled. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Iris, Murdoch. 1971. The sovereignty of good. New York: Schocken Books.Google Scholar
George, Panichas ed. 1977. Simone Weil reader. New York: Moyer Bell Limited.Google Scholar
Jennifer, Radden. 1996. Relational individualism and feminist therapy. Hypatia 11(3): 71–98.Google Scholar
Sara, Ruddick. 1989. Maternal thinking. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Sara, Ruddick 1995. Injustice in families. In Justice and care, ed. Held, Virginia. Oxford: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Sara, Ruddick 1998. Care as labor and relationship. In Norms and values: Essays in honor of Virginia Held, ed. Haber, Joram G. and Halfon, Mark S.Oxford: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Sara, Ruddick 1999. Introduction. In Mother troubles: Rethinking contemporary maternal dilemmas. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Simone, Weil. 1977a. Human personality. In Simone Weil reader, ed. Panichas, George. New York: Moyer Bell Limited.Google Scholar
Simone, Weil 1977b. Reflections on the right use of school studies with a view to the love of God. In Simone Weil reader, ed. Panichas, George. New York: Moyer Bell Limited.Google Scholar
Patricia, Williams. 1991. The alchemy of race and rights. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar