Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T14:48:19.885Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Aestheticism, Feminism, and the Dynamics of Reversal

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 March 2020

Amy Newman
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Postmodern aestheticism is defined as a way of thinking that privileges the art of continual reversal. The dynamics of reversal operate according to a theoretical model that, historically speaking, has been the vehicle for blatantly masculinist ideologies. This creates problems for feminist thinking that would appropriate the postmodern conception of the subjectivity of the artist or the aestheticist dissolution of the distinction between life and an.

Type
Research Article
Information
Hypatia , Volume 5 , Issue 2: Special Issue: Feminism and Aesthetics , Summer 1990 , pp. 20 - 32
Copyright
Copyright © 1990 by Hypatia, Inc.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allen, Jeffher. 1988. Poetic politics: How the Amazons took the Acropolis. Hypatia 3 (2): 107–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
BarOn, Bat‐Ami. 1982. Feminism and sadomasochism: Self‐critical notes. In Against sadomasochism: A radicalfemirust analysis. Linden, Robin R., et. al., eds. San Francisco: Frog in the Well.Google Scholar
Bataille, Georges. 1989. Theory of religion. Hurley, Robert, trans. New York: Zone Books.Google Scholar
Baynes, Kenneth, Bohman, James, and McCarthy, Thomas, eds. 1987. After phibsophy: End or transformation? Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Benjamin, Jessica. 1988. The bonds of love: Psychoanalysis, feminism, and the problem of domination. New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar
Bunch, Charlotte. 1987. Passionate politics. Feminist theory in action. New York: St. Martin's Press.Google Scholar
Cioran, E.M. 1987. Exasperations. Frank: An International Journal of Contemporary Writing and Art 6/7: 22–24.Google Scholar
Deleuze, Gilles, and Guattari, Felix. 1983. Anti‐oedipus: Capitalism ana' schizophrenia. Hurley, Robert, Seem, Mark and Lane, Helen R., trans. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Derrida, Jacques. 1978. Writing and difference. Bass, Alan, trans. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Gier, Nicholas. 1981. Wittgenstein and phenomenology: A comparative study of the later Wittgenstein, Husserl, Heidegger, and Merleau‐Ponty. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Gottlieb, Carla. 1976. Beyond modem art. New York: E.P. Dutton.Google Scholar
Haar, Michael. 1988. Heidegger and the Nietzschean “physiology of art.” In Exceedingly Nietzsche: Aspects of contemporary Nietzsche interpretation. Farrell Krell, David and Wood, David, eds. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Heidegger, Martin. 1971. The origin of the work of art. In Poetry, language, thought. Hofstadter, Albert, trans. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Heidegger, Martin. 1977. Letter on humanism. In Basic writings. Farrell Krell, David, ed. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Heidegger, Martin. 1979. Nietzsche: The will to power as art. Farrell Krell, David, trans. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Kernberg, Otto F. 1984. Severe personality disorders. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Lyotard, Jean F. 1978. Notes on return and kapital. Semiotext(e) 3(1): 44–53.Google Scholar
Megill, Allan. 1985. Prophets of extremity: Nietzsche, Heidegger, Foucault, Derrida. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Nietzsche, Friedrich. 1967. The will to power. Kaufmann, Walter, ed. Kaufmann, Walter and Hollingdale, R.J., trans. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Owens, Craig. 1983. The discourse of others: Feminists and postmodernism. In The anti‐aesthetic: Essays on postmodern culture. Foster, Hal, ed. Port Townsend, Washington: Bay Press.Google Scholar
Prado, CG. 1985. Reference and the composite self. International Studies m Philosophy 17 (1): 25–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Putnam, Frank W. 1989. Diagnosis and treatment of multiple personality disorder. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Rosen, Stanley. 1969. Nihilism: A philosophical essay. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Ruddick, Sara. 1989. Maternal thinking: Touwrd a politics of peace. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Sarup, Madan. 1989. An introductory guide to post‐structuralism and postmodernism. Athens: University of Georgia Press.Google Scholar
Schnädelbach, Herbert. 1984. Philosophy Germany I83I‐I933. Matthews, Eric, trans. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Smirnoff, V. N. 1970. The masochistic contract. International Journal of Psycho-analysis 50:665–671.Google Scholar
Stoller, Robert J. 1975. Perversion: The erotic form of hatred. Washington, D.C.: American Psychiatric Press.Google Scholar
Torres, Carmen, and Martin, Christine. 1988. What can they do to me now? Connexions 27:6–7.Google Scholar
Wittig, Monique. 1976. The lesbian body. LeVay, David, trans. New York: Avon.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, Ludwig. 1979. Remarks on Frazer's Golden Bough. In Wittgenstein. Sources and perspectives. Luckhardt, C. G., ed. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar