Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T22:28:09.217Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Abused Mind: Feminist Theory, Psychiatric Disability, and Trauma

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 March 2020

Abstract

I show how much psychiatric disability is informed by trauma, marginalization, sexist norms, social inequalities, concepts of irrationality and normalcy, oppositional mind-body dualism, and mainstream moral values. Drawing on feminist discussion of physical disability, I present a feminist theory of psychiatric disability that serves to liberate not only those who are psychiatrically disabled but also the mind and moral consciousness restricted in their ranges of rational possibilities.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © 2001 by Hypatia, Inc.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ariès, Philippe. 1974. Western attitudes toward death: From the Middle Ages to the present. Trans. Ranum, Patricia M.Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Bordo, Susan. 1993. Unbearable weight: Feminism, Western culture, and the body. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Breggin, Peter. 1994. Talking back to Prozac: What doctors won't tell you about today's most controversial drug. New York: St. Martin's Press.Google Scholar
Bruch, Hilde. 1981. The golden cage: The enigma of anorexia nervosa. Cambridge: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Calhoun, Cheshire. 1999. Moral failure. In On feminist ethics and politics, ed. Card, Claudia. Lawrence: University of Kansas Press.Google Scholar
Callahan, Joan C. 1999. Speech that harms. In On feminist ethics and politics, ed. Card, Claudia. Lawrence: University of Kansas Press.Google Scholar
Caplan, Paula J. 1995. They say you're crazy: How the world's most powerful psychiatrists decide who's normal. Reading, Mass.: Addison‐Wesley Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Card, Claudia. 1996. The unnatural lottery: Character and moral luck. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
Chernin, Kim. 1981. The obsession: Reflections on the tyranny of slenderness. Cambridge: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Chesler, Phyllis. 1972. Women and madness. New York: Avon Books.Google Scholar
Cuomo, Chris J. 1999. Feminist sex at century's end: On justice and joy. In On feminist ethics and politics, ed. Card, Claudia. Lawrence: University of Kansas Press.Google Scholar
Danica, Elly. 1988. Don't: A woman's word. Charlottetown, P.E.I.: Gynergy Books.Google Scholar
Donner, Wendy. 1997. Self and community in environmental ethics. In Ecofeminism: Woman, culture, nature, ed. Warren, Karen J.Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Dunayer, Joan. 1995. Sexist terms, speciesist roots. In Animals and women: Feminist theoretical explorations, ed. Adams, Carol J. and Donovan, Josephine. London: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Fisher, Bernice, and Tronto, Joan. 1990. Toward a feminist theory of caring. In Circles of care, ed. Abel, Emily and Nelson, Margaret. Albany: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
Freud, Sigmund. 1962. The aetiology of hysteria. In Standard edition, vol. 3, trans. Strachey, J.London: Hogarth Press.Google Scholar
Frye, Marilyn. 1983. The politics of reality: Essays in feminist theory. Freedom, California: The Crossing Press.Google Scholar
Gatz, Margaret, and Smyer, Michael. 1992. The mental health system and older adults in the 1990s American Psychologist 47: 741–51.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Greer, Germaine. 1995. Slip‐shod sibyls: Recognition, rejection and the woman poet. London: Viking.Google Scholar
Herman, Judith Lewis. 1992. Trauma and recovery. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Horrocks, Roger. 1998. Historical issues: Paradigms of homosexuality. In Contemporary perspectives on psychotherapy and homosexualities, ed. Shelley, Christopher. London: Free Association Books.Google Scholar
Jamison, Kay Redfield. 1993. Touched with fire: Manic‐depressive illness and the artistic temperament. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
Keith, Lois. 1996. Encounters with strangers: The public's responses to disabled women and how this affects our sense of self. In Encounters with strangers: Feminism and disability, ed. Shelley, Christopher. London: Women's Press.Google Scholar
Kristeva, Julia. 1992. The black sun. Trans. Roudiez, Leon S.New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Mairs, Nancy. 1996. Waist‐high in the world: A life among the nondisabled. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Mays, John Bentley. 1995. In the jaws of the black dogs: A memoir of depression. Toronto: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Middlebrook, Diane Wood. 1991. Anne Sexton: A biography. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company.Google Scholar
Millett, Kate. 1990. The loony‐bin trip. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
Overall, Christine. 1998. A feminist I: Reflections from academia. Toronto: Broadview Press.Google Scholar
Sartre, Jean‐Paul. 1947. Existentialism. Trans. Frechtman, Bernard. New York: The Philosophical Library.Google Scholar
Smyer, Michael A. 1995. Prevention and early intervention for mental disorders of the elderly. In Emerging issues in mental health aging, ed. Gatz, Margaret. Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
Szasz, Thomas. 1975. The myth of mental illness. St. Albans: Paladin.Google Scholar
Tronto, Joan. 1987. Beyond gender difference to a theory of care. Signs 12: 644–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warren, Karen. 1998. The power and promise of ecofeminism. In Environmental philosophy: From animal rights to radical ecology, gen. ed. Zimmerman, Michael E.Upper Saddle River, N.J.: Prentice‐Hall.Google Scholar
Wendell, Susan. 1992. Toward a feminist theory of disability. In Feminist perspectives in medical ethics, ed. Holmes, Helen Bequaert and Purdy, Laura M.Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Wendell, Susan 1996. The rejected body: Feminist philosophical reflections on disability. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar