Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T04:01:36.132Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Through Thick and Thin: Validity and Reflective Judgment

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 March 2020

April Flakne
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The application of “thick” ethical concepts is best understood as a process of reflective rather than deductive judgment. Taking the form “B is as X as A,” where X is a thick ethical concept and A and B are narrative wholes unified through X (for example, “Those who hid Jews from the Nazis were as brave as Achilles”), reflective judgment opens thick ethical concepts to transformation. Though interpretive, such reflective judgment may still be able to provide validity without recourse to “thin,” purportedly context-neutral terms.

Type
Research Article
Information
Hypatia , Volume 20 , Issue 3 , Summer 2005 , pp. 115 - 126
Copyright
Copyright © 2005 by Hypatia, Inc.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Arendt, Hannah. 1982. Lectures on Kant's political philosophy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arendt, Hannah. 1972. Lying in politics. In Crises of the republic. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.Google Scholar
Ferrara, Alessandro. 1998. Judgment, identity and authenticity. Philosophy and Social Criticism 24: 113–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibbard, A. 2003. Reasons thick and thin. The journal of Philosophy 100 (6): 288–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. 1987. Critique of judgment. Translated by Werner S. Pluhar New Jersey: Hackett Publisher.Google Scholar
Kristeva, Julia. 2001. Hannah Arendt: Life is narrative. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moody‐Adams, Michele. 1999. The idea of moral progress. Metaphilosophy 30 (3): 168–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moody‐Adams, Michele. 1997. Fieldwork in familiar places: Morality, culture, and philosophy. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Parekh, Bhikhu. 1990. The Rushdie affair: A research agenda for political philosophy. Political Studies 38: 695–705.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scanlon, T. M. 2003. Thickness and theory. The Journal of Philosophy 100 (6): 275–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, Bernard. 1985. Ethics and the limits of philosophy. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar