Hostname: page-component-7b9c58cd5d-dlb68 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-03-14T12:07:02.932Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Standpoint Theories: Productively Controversial

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 March 2020

Sandra Harding
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Symposium on Standpoint Theory
Information
Hypatia , Volume 24 , Issue 4 , Fall 2009 , pp. 192 - 200
Copyright
Copyright © 2009 by Hypatia, Inc.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Campbell, Marie, and Manicom, Ann, eds. 1995. Experience, knowledge, and ruling relations. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collins, Patricia Hill. 1986. Learning from the outsider within: The sociological significance of black feminist thought. Social Problems 33 (6): S14–S32. (Reprinted in Harding 2004.).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crenshaw, Kimberlé, Golanda, Neil, Peller, Garry, and Thomas, Kendall, eds. 1995. Critical race theory. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
Daniels, Cynthia R. 1990. Between fathers and fetuses: The social construction of male reproduction and the politics of fetal harm. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 22 (3): 580–616.Google Scholar
Harding, Sandra. ed. 2004. The feminist standpoint theory reader. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Harding, Sandra. ed. 2008. Sciences from below: Feminisms, postcolonialities, and modernities. Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harding, Sandra. 2010. Postcolonial and feminist philosophies of science and technology: Convergences and dissonances. In Science, colonialism, and postcoloniality. Post-Colonial Studies 12 (4, Special Issue).Google Scholar
Hartsock, Nancy. 2004. The feminist standpoint. In The feminist standpoint theory reader, ed. Harding, Sandra. New York: Routledge, pp. 35–53.Google Scholar
Jaggar, Alison. 1983. Feminist politics and epistemology. In Feminist politics and human nature. Totowa, N.J.: Rowman and Allenheld, pp. 353–93.Google Scholar
Jameson, Fredric. 1988. History and class consciousness as an “unfinished project.” Rethinking Marxism 1 (1): 49–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kenney, Sally J., and Kinsella, Helen, eds. 1997. Politics and feminist standpoint theories. New York: The Haworth Press.Google Scholar
Mignolo, Walter D. 2003. The darker side of the Renaissance: Literacy, territoriality, and colonization. 2nd ed. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Narayan, Uma. 1989. The project of a feminist epistemology: Perspectives from a non‐western feminist. In Gender/body/knowledge, ed. Bordo, Susan and Jaggar, Alison. New Brunswick, N.J.: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
Pels, Dick. 2001. Strange standpoints, or how to define the situation for situated knowledge. In The intellectual as stranger. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Sandoval, Chela. 1991. U.S. third world feminism: The theory and method of oppositional consciousness in the postmodern world. Genders 10:1–24. (Excerpted in Harding 2004.).Google Scholar
Silvers, Anita, and Stein, Michael Ashley. 2003. Essentially empirical: The roles of biological and legal classification in effectively prohibiting genetic discrimination. In Science and other cultures: Issues in philosophies of science and technology, ed. Figueroa, Robert and Harding, Sandra. New York: Routledge, pp. 129–53.Google Scholar
Smith, Dorothy. 1987. The everyday world as problematic. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Smith, Dorothy. 1990. The conceptual practices of power. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Smith, Dorothy. 2005. Institutional ethnography: A sociology for people. Lanham, Md.: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Smith, Linda Tuhiwai. 1999. Decolonizing methodology: Research and indigenous peoples. New York: St. Martin's Press.Google Scholar
Visvanathan, Nalini, Duggan, Lynn, Nisonoff, Laurie, and Wiegersma, Nan, eds. 1997. The women, gender and development reader. London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
Wylie, Alison. 2004. Why standpoint matters. In The feminist standpoint theory reader, ed. Harding, Sandra. New York: Routledge, pp. 339–51.Google Scholar