Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T05:04:23.907Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Role of Darwin in Elizabeth Grosz's Deleuzian Feminist Theory: Sexual Difference, Ontology, and Intervention

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2020

Tuija Pulkkinen
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In this article on Elizabeth Grosz's philosophy and its implications for discussions about feminist theory, I first suggest that Charles Darwin plays a particular role in Grosz's recent ontological thought. This role is to provide help in joining together two incompatible sources in her work: Gilles Deleuze's monistic ontology of a constant flow of new differentiations, on the one hand, and Luce Irigaray's thought of sexual difference as the primary ontological difference, on the other. I argue that Grosz's intellectual project has developed into a grand general theory of change in which both Darwin and Irigaray are turned into ontologists in a Deleuzian vein. I then point out that Grosz's ontology also includes a political aspect, which manifests in the fact that Grosz redescribes Darwin through interpreting him primarily as a theorist of “event” and the unexpected. However, through an analysis of the discussion on Grosz between Luciana Parisi and Jami Weinstein, I speculate whether Grosz's ambition to provide a total and complete explanation of change encourages the tone of feminist discussion toward one of explanation rather than intervention.

Type
Articles
Information
Hypatia , Volume 32 , Issue 2 , Spring 2017 , pp. 279 - 295
Copyright
Copyright © 2017 by Hypatia, Inc.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ansell‐Pearson, Keith. 1999. Germinal life: The difference and repetition of Deleuze. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Arendt, Hannah. 1958. The human condition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Battersby, Christine. 1998. The phenomenal woman: Feminist metaphysics and the patterns of identity. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bogue, Ronald. 1989. Deleuze and Guattari. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Boundas, Constantin V., and Olkowski, Dorthea, eds. 1994. Gilles Deleuze and the theater of philosophy. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Chanter, Tina. 1995. Ethics of eros: Irigaray's rewriting of the philosophers. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Deleuze, Gilles. 1994. Difference and repetition. Trans. Paul Patton. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Deleuze, Gilles, and Guattari, Felix. 1987. A thousand plateaus: Capitalism and schizophrenia. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Deleuze, Gilles, and Guattari, Felix. 1994. What is philosophy?. Trans. Hugh Tomlinson and Graham Burchell. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Grosz, Elizabeth. 1994. Volatile bodies: Toward a corporeal feminism. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Grosz, Elizabeth. 2000. Deleuze's Bergson: Duration, the virtual and a politics of the future. In Deleuze and feminist theory, ed. Buchanan, Ian and Colebrook, Claire. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Grosz, Elizabeth. 2004. The nick of time: Politics, evolution, and the untimely. Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grosz, Elizabeth. 2005. Time travels: Feminism, nature, power. Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grosz, Elizabeth. 2008. Chaos, territory, art: Deleuze and the framing of the earth. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Grosz, Elizabeth. 2011. Becoming undone: Darwinian reflections on life, politics, and art. Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grosz, Elizabeth, ed. 1999. Becomings: Explorations in time, memory, and futures. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Hardt, Michael. 1993. Gilles Deleuze: An apprenticeship in philosophy. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hemmings, Clare. 2011. Why stories matter: The political grammar of feminist theory. Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hill, Rebecca. 2008. Phallocentrism in Bergson: Life and matter. In Deleuze and gender, ed. Colebrook, Claire and Weinstein, Jami. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Irigaray, Luce. 1996. I love to you: Sketch for a felicity within history. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Irigaray, Luce. 1999. The forgetting of air in Martin Heidegger. Trans. Mary Beth Mader. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Irigaray, Luce. 2001. To be two. Trans. Monique M. Rhodes and Marco F. Cocito‐Monoc. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Irni, Sari. 2013. The politics of materiality: Affective encounters in a transdiciplinary debate. European Journal of Women's Studies 20 (4): 347–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marks, John. 1998. Gilles Deleuze: Vitalism and multiplicity. London: Pluto Press.Google Scholar
Massumi, Brian. 1992. A user's guide to capitalism and schizophrenia: Deviations from Deleuze and Guattari. Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
May, Todd. 2005. Gilles Deleuze: An introduction. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mouffe, Chantal. 2013. Agonistics: Thinking of the world politically. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Palonen, Kari. 2003. Quentin Skinner: History, politics, rhetoric. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Parisi, Luciana. 2009. The adventures of a sex. In Deleuze and queer theory, ed. Nigianni, Chrysanthi and Storr, Merl. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Parisi, Luciana. 2010. Event and evolution. Southern Journal of Philosophy 48 (Spindel Supplement): 147–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patton, Paul, ed. 1996. Deleuze: A critical reader. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Pulkkinen, Tuija. 2015. Identity and intervention: Transdisciplinarity and disciplinarity in gender studies. Theory, Culture & Society 32 (5–6): 183–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pulkkinen, Tuija. 2016. Feelings of injustice: The institutionalization of gender studies and the pluralization of feminisms. Differences 27 (2): 103–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sullivan, Nikki. 2012. The somatechnics of perception and the matter of the non/human: A critical response to the new materialism. European Journal of Women's Studies 19 (3): 299–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weinstein, Jami. 2010. A requiem to sexual difference: A response to Luciana Parisi's “Event and evolution.” Southern Journal of Philosophy 48 (Spindel Supplement): 165–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar