Article contents
Response to Bordo's “Feminist Skepticism and the ‘Maleness’ of Philosophy”
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 11 March 2020
Abstract
Bordo argues that the “theoretics of heterogeneity” taken too far prevents us from being able make generalizations or broadly conceptual statements about women. 1 argue that the political efficacy of feminism does not depend on the capacity to speak from the perspective of “women” and that the insistence on the heterogeneity of the category of women does not imply an opposition to abstraction but rather moves abstract thinking in a self-critical and democratizing direction.
- Type
- Symposium on Susan Bordo's “Feminist Skepticism and the ‘Maleness’ of Philosophy”
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © 1992 by Hypatia, Inc.
References
Bordo, Susan. 1992. Feminist skepticism and the “maleness” of philosophy. In Women and reason, ed. Harvey, Elizabeth and Okruhlik, Kathleen. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Pratt, Minnie Bruce. 1984. Identity: Skin, blood, heart. In Yours in struggle, ed. Bulkin, Elly, Bruce Pratt, Minnie, and Smith, Barbara. New York: Long Haul Press.Google Scholar
- 2
- Cited by