Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T16:07:37.824Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Reclamation from Absence? Luce Irigaray and Women in the History of Philosophy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 March 2020

Sarah Tyson
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Luce Irigaray's work does not present an obvious resource for projects seeking to reclaim women in the history of philosophy. Indeed, many authors introduce their reclamation project with an argument against conceptions, attributed to Irigaray or “French feminists” more generally, that the feminine is the excluded other of discourse. These authors claim that if the feminine is the excluded other of discourse, then we must conclude that even if women have written philosophy they have not given voice to feminine subjectivity; therefore, reclamation is a futile project. In this essay, I argue against such conclusions. Rather, I argue, Irigaray's work requires that philosophy be transformed through the reclamation of women's writing. She gives us a method of reclamation for the most difficult cases: those in which we have no record of women's writing. Irigaray offers this method through an engagement with the character of Diotima in Plato's Symposium. The method Irigaray demonstrates is reclamation as love.

Type
Found Cluster on Luce Irigaray
Information
Hypatia , Volume 28 , Issue 3 , Summer 2013 , pp. 483 - 498
Copyright
Copyright © 2013 by Hypatia, Inc.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

For their excellent feedback I would like to thank Penelope Deutscher, Gregg Horowitz, Kelly Oliver, and two anonymous Hypatia reviewers. I owe a special thanks to Lisa Guenther for her help in nurturing this idea from acorn to oak.

References

Dancy, R.M. 1989. On A history of women philosophers, vol. 1. Review of A history of women philosophers, by Mary Ellen Waithe. Hypatia 4 (1): 160–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deutscher, Penelope. 1997. Yielding gender. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Irigaray, Luce. 1985a. Speculum of the other woman. Trans. Gill, Gillian C.Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Irigaray, Luce. 1985b. This sex which is not one. Trans. Porter, C.Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Irigaray, Luce. 1993. An ethics of sexual difference. Trans. Burke, Carolyn and Gill, Gillian C.Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Irigaray, Luce. 1996. I love to you: Sketch of a possible felicity in history. Trans. Martin, Alison. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, Martha. 2001. The Fragility of goodness: Luck and ethics in Greek tragedy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nye, Andrea. 1989. The hidden host: Irigaray and Diotima at Plato's symposium. Hypatia 3 (3): 45–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waithe, Mary Ellen, ed. 1987. A history of women philosophers, vol. 1. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warren, 1989. Feminist archeology: Uncovering women's philosophical history. Review A history of women philosophers, vol. 1. Hypatia 4 1: 155–159.Google Scholar
Weed, Elizabeth. 1994. The question of style. In Engaging with Irigaray: Feminist philosophy and modern European thought, ed. Burke, Carolyn, Schor, Naomi and Whitford, Margaret. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar