Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T00:17:02.511Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Recipes, Cooking, and Conflict—A Response to Heldke's “Recipes for Theory Making7rdquo;

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 March 2020

Abstract

This paper contends that Heldke's recipe analogy can be reworked to help us deal with those who hold beliefs and practice activities that are contrary to our own. It draws upon the work of William James and John Dewey to develop a practical approach to such conflict situations.

Type
Comment/Reply
Copyright
Copyright © 1990 by Hypatia, Inc.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Dewey, John. 1971. The study of ethics; a syllabus. In Dewey, John: The early works, 1882‐1898, Vol. 4. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar
Dewey, John. 1976. Lectures on psychological and political ethics: 1898. Koch, Donald F., ed. New York: Hafher Press.Google Scholar
Dewey, John. 1922. Human nature and conduct. New York: Henry Holt and Co.Google Scholar
Heldke, Lisa. 1988. Recipes for theory making. Hypatia: Ajournai of Feminist Philosophy (3)2:1529.Google Scholar
James, William. 1979. The moral philosopher and the moral life. In James, William, The will to believe and other essays in popular philosophy. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1979.Google Scholar
Luker, Kristin. 1984. Abortion and the politics of motherhood. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Peirce, C.S. 1934. The fixation of belief. In Collected papers of C.S. Peirce, Vol. V. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.223247Google Scholar
Perry, Ralph Barton. 1935. The thought and character of William James, Vol. II. Boston: Little Brown and Co.Google Scholar